Never miss an update

Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533

Item specifics

Condition: New without tags :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item that is not in original retail packaging or may be missing original retail packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Display Shoe. Light scuffs in material of both shoes. Lightly wrinkled material. The images shown are of the actual shoes for sale.
Brand: Calvin Klein Heel Type: Block
US Shoe Size (Women's): 5.5 Pattern: Solid
Colour: Black Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.)
MPN: Felda Width: Medium (B, M)
Style: Ankle Boots Shade: Black
Material: Leather UPC: 190233167400
Never miss an update

Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533 -

    Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533
    Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533
    Kenneth Cole REACTION Pull Ashore Fringe Ankle Booties, Black , Franco Sarto Canary Knee Hgh Zip Up Boots 574, Black, 7 US / 37 EU , Circa Joan & David Talaro Riding Boots 292, Dark Brown, 6.5 US , Franco Sarto Kerri Tall Block Heel Boots 324, Mushroom, 9.5 US / 39.5 EUCalvin Klein Giada Motorcycle Boots, Black, 11 US / 41 EU , The North Face Thermoball Utility Quilted Winter Boots, Dove Grey/Calypso Coral, , BCBGeneration Sunshine Knee High Stretch Boots, BlackKhombu Jenna Fleece Lined Mid Calf Winter Boots, Grey/BlackBianca buccheri ankle boots forata 36 5.5 brand new rrp $639Marc Fisher Weity Ankle Boots, Black Leatherb, 8 USCalvin Klein Jeans Narice Ankle Boots, Black , naturalizer Kepler Block Heel Ankle Boots, Black , Calvin Klein Priya Over the Knee Boots 161, Black Suede, 6.5 US / 36.5 EUMuck Boots Women's Woody Insulated Waterproof Hunting Boots in Black and GreenCalvin Klein Donnily Back Cross Stitch Riding Boots, Coffee Bean, 6.5 US / 36.5 , Born Chaval Flat Casual Ankle Boots 530, Brown, 6.5 US / 37 EU , GUESS Mallay Mid-Calf Dress Boots 556, Light Brown, 9 US , Bandolino Cuyler Riding Boots 610, Black, 5.5 USIvanka Trump Avali Pointed-Toe Booties, Dark Green Suede , Kenneth Cole REACTION Pull Ashore Fringe Ankle Booties, Charcoal, 8.5 US / 39.5Men/Women NEW Easy Steps Tokyo Boot Black Long-term reputation luxurious value , Born Malika Block Heel Knee High Boots 420, Tan, 8.5 USEMU Australia Womens Acton Metallic Cow Suede Boots , ZIGI Enzy Platform Pointed Toe Stiletto Knee High Boots, Black , Lucky Brand Khoraa Block-Heel Ankle Boots, Brindle, 10 US / 40 EUSofft Felicia Knee High Dress Boots, Ash Grey, 9.5 US / 41 EU , Kenneth Cole Dahvi Peep-Toe Ankle Boots 054, Black/Black, 7 US / 37.5 EU , Leather Kookai ankle boots size 38 worn onceEnzo Angiolini Daniana Riding Boots 583, Dark Brown Leather, 9 US
    Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533 ->Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533 -
    AGL Attilio Giusti Leombruni Accordia Knee High Boot Size 10 NDesigner BNWOB Ginger & Smart Size 37 Leather Snake Effect Women's Ankle Boots , JUST CAVALLI MAN LOAFERS SHOES CASUAL FREE TIME LEATHER CODE. S12WR0033 , Noble Outfitters Mens Leather Cowboy Western Boots Adobe Blue Sizez 12Nina Neely Slingback Strappy Dress Sandals 134, Charcoal Glitter, 6.5 US , ~$425~ Miu Miu Multicolor Patent Leather Peep Toe Heels Size 39 , Womens Round Toe Bling Bling Rhinestone Fur Ankle Strap Block Heel Sandals Shoes , Marni Paneled Geo Platform Sandals Heels Size Euro 37 US 6 Green/BrownTOM FORM Studded Pointed Pumps (SIZE 39.5)Splendid LL1245 Womens Betsy Slide Sandal- Choose SZ/Color.Nike Rosherun Bleached Turquoise Catalina Size 13 2014' 511881 301 , Nike Roshe One Flight Weight (GS) Shoes Trainers 705486 006 - Size 5.5Y/ Womns 7 , NWOB NIKE Mens Size 13 M Solarsoft Moccasin Sea Spray 555301-333 NEW , Men's Brand New Converse Jack Purcell Signature OX Fashion Sneakers [151449C]New Balance Elite Edition 1600 Red Suede Running Shoes Mens Size 10 , Mens Nike Zoom KD 9 Elite 878637-010 Basketball Shoes Hyper Orange Black SIZE 11 , NEW Nike Vomero 8 - Red/White Running, Cross Training (Men's 18) , 27 New Mens Nike Air Presto Essential Grey Blue White Shoes 848187-010 Size 11 , NIKE DUNK LOW PREMIUM SB SUPREME FIRE RED BLACK CEMENT GREY WHITE 313170-600 12 , Amali Mens Black Vertical Embossed Velvet Smoking Slipper w/ Tassel : Abrams-000BLACK,BROWN Mens Pointed Toe Leather Dress Formal Slip On Casaul Shoes US6,7,7.5 , Women's Nike Air Max 1 Ultra SE Black 861711-002 Shoes Size 9.5VANS Sk8 Hi Slim (Gold Eyelets) Laurel Wreath/True White Green WOMEN'S 7 , Saolomon Speed Cross 4 Trail Running Sneaker - Women's Size 10.5 Black/Yellow , DZ812 MBT shoes gray leather women sneakers 6 - 6.5 () , Xelero Women's Matrix One SneakerVogue Girls Sport Pull On Riding Ankle Boots Collegiate Military Boots Shoes New , $200 PENNY LOVES KENNY suede DANCER STILLETO embellished club cowgirl boot , Clarks Women's Faralyn May Waterproof Knee High Boot$$$Justin Kiltie Ankle Boot Women Two Tone Ostrich Honey Brown Leather size 9AA ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Calvin Black, 35.5 Klein Felda Block Heel US Ankle Boots 695, Black, 5.5 US/ 35.5 EU d6b3533