Never miss an update

Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc




Item specifics

Condition:
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Sole: Rubber
UPC: Does not apply MPN: 849560-601
Activity: Running Lining: Textile
Product Line: Air Max Brand: Nike
Colour: tea berry port wine wolf grey 601 Material: Textile
Never miss an update

Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc - blurrypron.com

    Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc
    Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc
    nike womens flyknit lunar3 trainers 698182 101 sneakers shoesAdidas Originals Nmd_R1 Pk Mens Running Trainers Sneakers Shoes BB2888Nike Womens Air Rift PRM QS Running Trainers 848502 600 Sneakers Shoes , Nike Womens Air Zoom Fearless Flyknit Running Trainers 850426 Sneakers Shoes 003Nike Womens Air Max 1 Ultra 2.0 Fk Metallic Running Trainers 881195 Sneakers 001 , nike womens air max 90 ultra BR trainers 725061 401 sneakers shoesNike Womens Lunarepic Low Flyknit Running Trainers 843765 005 Sneakers ShoesNike Air Max Thea Ultra JCRD PRM Womens Running Trainers 885021 001 SneakersAdidas Originals NMD_R1 Womens Running Trainers BA7476 Sneakers CLEARANCE , Nike Womens Air Max 95 QS Running Trainers 814914 002 Sneakers ShoesNew Vivobarefoot Kanna Hi Womens Black Textile Vegan Minimalist Boot , Nike Womens Lunarepic Flyknit Running Trainers 818677 007 Sneakers Shoes , Nike Womens Free RN Flyknit 2017 Gyakusou Running Trainers 883288 Shoes 001Nike Womens Lunarglide 9 X-Plore Running Trainers 904744 Sneakers Shoes 100 , Nike Womens Free RN Distance 2 Running Trainers 863776 Sneakers Shoes 501 , Nikelab Womens Free RN Motion Flyknit 2017 Running Trainers 883292 Shoes 201 , Nike Free Transform Flyknit Womens Running Trainers 833410 601 Sneakers Shoes , Nike Womens Huarache Run Ultra BR Trainers 833292 Sneaker Shoe 401 , Nike Womens Free Tr Flyknit 2 Indigo Running Trainers 904656 Sneakers Shoes 104nike womens air vapormax running trainers AH9045 002 sneakers shoes CLEARANCE , Nike Womens Zoom Kynsi JCRD WP Hi Top Boots 806978 001 Sneakers ShoesNike Air Max 1 Pinnacle Womens Running Trainers 839608 500 Sneakers Shoes , Nike Womens Lunarglide 8 Runing Trainers 843726 Sneakers Shoes 001Nike Air Max Thea Lx Womens Running Trainers 881203 Sneakers Shoes 600Nike air max thea PRM womens running trainers 616723 sneakers shoes 015 , Nike Womens Flyknit Lunar3 LB Running Trainers 826838 003 Sneakers ShoesNike Womens Af1 Air Force 1 Flyknit Low Running Trainers 820256 Sneakers 007 , Nike Womens Free RN Cmtr 2017 Prem Running Trainers Aa1622 Sneakers Shoes 001Nike Womens Air Max 90 PRM LEA Running Trainers 904535 100 Sneakers Shoes ,
    Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc - blurrypron.com>Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc - blurrypron.com
    ECCO WOMEN'S FELICIA, MID ANKLE BOOT ZIP BROWN SIZE 39, NEW IN BOX , Chloe Black Leather Silver Buckle Moto Biker Boots Shoes Size 36.5AQUATALIA CALLIE Black Suede Quilted Weatherproof Wedge Boots Sz 10 NEW $525Man/Woman Adidas NMD Grey Primeknit 6.5 Excellent value Cheaper than the price Exquisite (processing) processing , Gentleman/Lady Seychelles Womens Quake Closed Toe Oxfords Long-term reputation delicate Breathable shoes , Womens ENZO ANGIOLINI 208353 silver shimmer fabric peep toe pumps sz. 7 NEW! , Sexy 6" stripper flower rose filled platform shoes , Earthies Trevi Cognac Leathe Shoes Size 8 M , Giuseppe Zanotti Designs VICINI Purple Beweled Gold Chain Strappy Heels Size 9.5 , Stuart Weitzman NL10153 Multicolor Patent Leather Wedge Sandal 10 40 NIB $380 , NIB! BALLIN RESORT~GOLD SHEEN FULL LINEN EXOTIC 3.5" HEELS~IT SIZE 38~US 8New Aquazurra Sexy Thing Black Suede Wedge Sandal 37.5, 7.5 Fits Like 7 , Jimmy Choo Women's Silver Strappy Leslie Sandals 6462 Sz 39.5 EUR $895 , Finn Comfort Black Patent Sandals Size 7 Women's , Gentlemen/Ladies Dyeables Womens Minka online sale Quality First Beautiful and charming , ECCO Women's Damara Thong Flip Flop - Choose SZ/Color , adidas Neo Hoops Team Mens Sneakers / Shoes - Grey - F98883 , 2008 Puma Blaze Of Glory "1968 Mexico Olympics" , LACOSTE GRAD VULC 117 1 FLE CAM MENS TRAINER SHOE SIZE 8 8.5 9 9.5 RRP /-ADIDAS SUPERSTAR ADI-COLOR W5 ADIDAS WHITE mens SHELLTOES SHOES 9adidas White Mountaineering TUBULAR NOVA - Green - Mens , Men Dr. Martens 1460 Hi Top 8 - Eye 14353001 Black Mono Smooth 100% Original New , OluKai Men's Nohona Thong Sandal Black/Black Synthetic Thong SandalsBATES MENS LITES HIGH GLOSS PADDED COLLAR CHUKKA BOOT BLACK 3ESkechers Sport Womens Breathe Easy Nice N Cool Sneaker- Select SZ/Color. , Nina Women's Corita Mesh D'Orsay Pump Soft Gold Champagne Metallic Foil/Mesh , Women's Altra Footwear Torin 3.5 Zero Drop Running Shoes Blue Sizes 6.5-11 M , Men's/Women's LOVE MOSCHINO BASKET/SNEAKERS LOVE MOSCHINO Clearance price New style British temperamentRockport Women's Keturah V81426 Slip On Booties Size 9, Black Suede 496Nine West Women's Madave Fashion Knee High Boots Black Patent Size 10 M
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nike Womens Air Shoes Max 2017 Trainers Running Trainers 29902 849560 Sneakers Shoes 601 1638bbc
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;