Never miss an update

Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Guess
Pattern: Other Style: Trainers
Country/Region of Manufacture: Other Width: Other
US Shoe Size (Women's): all sizes Material: Fabric
US Shoe Size (Men's): all sizes Color: Black White
Never miss an update

Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9 -

    Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9
    Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9
    Adidas München men's low-top sneakers leather casual shoes trainers NEW , 1999 Nike Air Holistic Uptempo Size 13 Original OG Vintage Unwearable RARE force , Nike Lunarglide 8 VIII men running run shoes NEW ember glow 843725-801 , {MSX90RLA} Men's New Balance X90 RE-CONSTRUCTED - MOONBEAM/CASTLEROCK *NEW*NIB MENS PUMA MERCEDES AMG FUTURE CAT S2 F1 WHITE MOTORSPORT RACING SNEAKER SHOENike Mens Sz 8 Metcon 3 Shoes Grey/Lite Bone/Volt 852928-004 , NIKE AIR MAX 90 ULTRA 2.0 FLYKNIT "MULTI" SZ 7.5 MENS-WOMENS 9.5 [875943-002] , Converse Jack Purcell Signature OX 156175C Navy Men Sizes NEW 100% Authentic , Mens Brand New Nike Air Zoom Structure 20 Athletic Fashion Sneakers [849576 301] , Brand New BOTTICELLI LIMITED Mens Fashion Sneakers US Sz 12 (ITALY)New VANS Mens PATCHWORK DENIM Authetic VN0A38EMQ9H US M 7 - 10 TAKSE , Nike Air Jordan Retro 1 High Rare Air Patch Black Gym Red White Size 8.5 , 32 Adidas Crazy Explosive 2017 Basketball Shoes Black/Yellow Size 12.5, 13Adidas NMD R1 STLT PK Primeknit Boost Hi-Res Blue Core Black Chalk Men's CQ2388Nike Air Jordan Retro II 2 BLACK INFRARED RED 23 CEMENT 385475-023 MEN SZ 11 , Nike Men's Size 9.5 Air Force 1 Ultraforce Mid Triple White Shoes 864014 100 , Nike Air Safari QS OG 2018 Retro Jungle Flashback Monrach Men Limited AO3295-001 , Adidas Originals Superstar BOOST White Black BB0188 Shell Toe Toes Ultra Gold , Nike iD Air Force 1 Mid Men’s Size 10 UNIVERSITY RED/SAIL-GUM AQ3776-991 , Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Low "Cactus" Men's size 12 NewNEW NIKE MENS KOBE AD SIZE 10 PORT WINE 922482-602 DEADSTOCKJORDAN TRAINER 2 FLYKNIT MEN'S TRAINING SHOE LIFESTYLE PREMIUM COMFY SNEAKER , Lacoste Ansted 318 1 U - Black - Mens , USED MENS NIKE AIR JORDAN III 3 RETRO + 3/4 HIGH 2000 EDITION 136045 101 SZ 11.5Adidas NMD R1 Tech Ink SS31514 Size 11 , New Skull Rose Pattern Casual Fashion Mens Essential Sports Unisex Low-end ShoesNike Air Zoom Mariah Flyknit Racer Men's Sz 10 Black Grey White 918264-008 NEWNike Air Zoom Huarache 2K4 size 13 Kobe All-Star Red Blue White 308475-100 , Nike Lebron Soldier XI 11 SFG Wheat Metallic Gold Brown 897646-700 Men's 11.5-13
    Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9 ->Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9 -
    Via Spiga Womens Elona Suede Almond Toe Ankle Cold Weather BootsNew Donald J. Pliner Naba Black Fabric Knee High Boots Womens Size 10 M* , GENUINE LUCCHESE QUALITY 77846 - 2L510 WOMEN'S (9.5 B) CAMEL BROWN COWBOY BOOTS , Mr/Ms Jimmy Choo Mitchel Flat Bootie We have won praise from our customers. In short supply Human borderShoes Submarine New Manchester Suede SML710030 Ciment Claw Man Sneakers Vintage , Womens Kickers Kick Lo Brogue Core Leather Patent Black School Work ShoesGentlemen/Ladies Pleaser XTREME-873 main category Modern design The first batch of customers' comprehensive specifications , BRAND NEW WOMENS KNIGHT SUPERSOFT BY DIANA FERRARI COMFORT ANKLE BOOTS SZ 7.5 c , 2018 Sexy Womens Suede Stilettos Suede High Heels Rhinetone Shoes Pumps Prom SZ , Badgley Mischka Jeannie Crystal & Satin Pumps, Women's Size 5.5 M, IvoryChristian Louboutin Lady Peep SLINGBACK wedge Sandal $675YSL sz 9.5 39.5 Yves Saint Laurent Tribtoo Light Pink Leather Platform Pump Shoe , NIKE WOMENS AIR FORCE 1 WHITE SPORT ROYAL VARSITY RED WMNS SIZE 8 307109-141 , Katy Perry Women's The Kiki Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorNew Mens 9 NIKE Air Max Effort TR AMP Super Bowl XLIX Shoes $110 705367-008 , Nike Zoom Lebron III 3 Black Metallic Gold Sneakers Shoes Size 8 (312147-006) , Nike Superfly 6 Elite WTM FG What The Mercurial Black AR2079 001 NOBOXTOP 10.5New Clarks of England Wallabee Black Leather Men's Shoes 37981 Size 10.5Kenneth Cole New York M72781 I-deal Slip-on Driving Loafers Mens Size 10 MYouth Mens Trendy Pointy Toe Metal Decor High Heels Party Bar Shoes Leather , Allen Edmonds Shoes Size 9.5 Nashua Leather Moc-Toe Tassel Kiltie Loafers $195sp , BEAUTIFUL JOHNSTON & MURPHY SOFT LEATHER DRESS SHOES OXFORDS BROGUE BROWN 10.5 M , NIKE AIR MAX THEA SE SIZE 7-12 WOMEN'S SNEAKERS SHOES (861674 901)Man's/Woman's ADIDAS Cf Advantage Cl Rose Poudre Various styles Elegant style Preferential priceMen/Women Nike Zoom Live Women's White/Reflective/Clear 97625100 Ideal gift for all occasions Quality and quantity guaranteed Known for its excellent quality , Gabor Women's Gabor 6.2400 River Loafer 6.5 US 37 4G , NIB Christian Louboutin Frangine Fringe Yellow Suede Flat Hightop Sneaker 36 , Bandalino Floella Zip Up Ankle Boots 403, Black/Black, 8.5 US , Man's/Woman's FURFUR Shoes 150219 Black 38 Guarantee quality and quantity At a lower price Don't worry when shopping , Women Leather Ankle Boot Punk Gothic Platform Block High Heel Party Club Shoes
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Guess Guess Luiss Black White Red Leather Leather Mens Red Trainers Shoes 39b8ea9
    Athletic Shoes