Never miss an update

100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: In good condition. Damage on heels (see pic 7) Also mark on toe area (see pic 6). This item does not have a box or dust bag.
Brand: Givenchy Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy
Style: Pumps, Classics US Shoe Size (Women's): 8 - 9
Color: BROWN Material: Leather
Heel Height: High (3 to 4 1/4) Features: Ankle Strap
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): 39 UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591 - blurrypron.com

    100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591
    100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591
    Frankie Stern Black-Blue Suede 2 Band Wedge SandalFenty Puma by Rihanna Women's Chelsea Sneaker Boots(8.5/UK6/25cm)Starling Blue , Stuart Weitzman Tiegirl Women's Black Nappa Leather Heels Sandals Size 10 MBebe New Sexy Gold Scale Black Platform Cutout Booties Platform Pumps Heels SZ 8Mark Fisher Adalyne Wedge Spadrilles Size 9.MDonald J Pliner " Sylvi " sz 10 , Gentleman/Lady Bebe White Heels Size 7 Special price King of quantity Popular tide shoes , new $495 DONNA KARAN classic low heels pumps shoes Italy 38 US 8 - classicDansko Women's Dorothy Dress Pump - Choose SZ/ColorChristian Louboutin Womens Pumps Size 38 8 Purple Patent Leather Pointed ToeStuart Weitzman Slinky Naked Aniline 7.5M NEW $425Yves Saint Laurent Black Leather Platform Pumps SZ 39.57" Gold Rhinestones Tassels Platform Stripper Shoes Pleaser Pole Dancer Heels , IRREGULAR CHOICE LONDON SPLISH SPLASH BLACK FLOWERS PUMP HEELS SHOES 7.5 NIBBEAUX ESCARPINS de Couleur CAMEL Marque PRADA Taille 38 TBEEDMUNDO CASTILLO Copper Eileen Platform Sandals Size 8.5 US / 38.5 EU $895 NWOBFidji Women's V623 Dress Sandal, Black, 37.5 EU/7.5 M US , REBECCA MINKOFF Women's Brie Port Pointed Toe Suede Pumps Sz 7 $225 NIBMen/Women diane von furstenberg Shoes selling price New design cheaper , Stuart Weitzman Black Blue Suede "Stitchup" Pumps SZ 6Marc Jacobs Pump Heel BLACK leather Size 6 Peep Toe , Man's/Woman's Emilio pucci womens shoes Complete specification range In short supply Preferred boutique , Saint Laurent YSL Tribute Patent Leather Platform Sandals size 39 BeautifulBadgley Mischka Women's Poloma D'Orsay Pump - Choose SZ/ColorRAG & BONE BLACK MARTA SUEDE OPEN TOE HEEL SANDAL BOOTIES 38.5, $495 , Blue by Betsey Johnson Women's Sb-Holly Dress Sandal Champagne 8.5 M US , TORY BURCH Laser-cut Leather Wedge Sandals Sz 10.5 US / 40 1/2 EU $325 , John Fluevog White w Blue Leather Peep Toe Mules Heels Sz. 7.5 , BRUNO MAGLI BLUE SUEDE PLATFORMS PEEP TOE HIGH HEELS PUMPS SHOES WOMEN'S 39 ,
    100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591 - blurrypron.com>100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591 - blurrypron.com
    Principe di Bologna Rocco P black knee high boots 36.5 = 37-38 4.5-5 6.5-7 Guidi , FRYE Steffi Leather Zip Tall Boot Brown Women Sz 7 1/2 M FRYE! , Women's Shoes Ankle Boots MOMA 91503-V1 Appalosa Nero Black Vintage Made ItalyDr. Scholls Jasmin Block Heel Perforated Sandals, Willow, 7.5 US / 37.5 EUDansko Size US 11.5 12 Mary Jane Leather Loafer New Womens Shoes , JOE N JOYCE Soria Sneakers - Yellow - Textile , Skechers Gowalk Joy Coral Womens Slip-On Size 8.5MNEW MIU MIU by Prada Denim Ribbon Ankle Wrap Slide Flats Mules Shoe 36.5 6.5Clarks Originals X DESERT YARRA WALNUT Suede Boots , PLEASER Open Toe Heel Thigh Boots Rhinestone Platform BEJEWELED-3019DM-7 BlackBlowfish Women's Dirry Flat Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorFree People x BASKE california Ariel Peep Toe Bootie (Women) Nude Leather 8 , STICO Womens BLUE Non-Slip Safety Beach Slipper Sandal EVA Ceramic KOREA_IGAdidas Crazylight Boost 2.5 Men's Basketball Shoes White/Grey/Vivid Red AQ8468ASICS Men's GEL-Venture 6 Trail Running Shoeadidas Originals Superstar Bounce Primeknit men lifestyle shoes NEW white S82243 , Nike Air Max 1 Ultra Moire Violet Persian Black Grape Purple NSW AM1 7 8 9 10 12Reebok Artic Ready 3 ( Black /Red ) Shoes Men size 9 NIB908019-002 Nike Men Presto Fly Black Whiteadidas Men's Ball 365 Inspired Basketball Shoe, White/Black/Grey Two, 11 Medi...Nike SB zoom Dunk High Elite Black Teal Skateboarding shoe Sz 9.5 -917567-003 , Nike Men Air Zoom Structure 21 Shoes Running Burgundy Sneakers Shoe 904695-600 , Nike SF Air Force 1 Mid Mens 917753-005 Black Leather Nylon Shoes Size 8 , Nike Lebron XII 12 Low LMTD Air Max 95 Black Orange 812560 081 Mens size 10 NEW , Mens Casual Boat Shoes Leather Print Shoes Soft Driving Slip On Shoes Fashion$$ , Rockport Mens Total Motion Penny Driving Style Loafer- Pick SZ/Color.Thoroughbred Horse Print Christmas Running Shoes For Women-Free ShippingVintage CONVERSE Chucks Purple Leather Low Top Shoes Sneakers Kicks Women's 8 USColumbia Bugabootoo Women's Tan/Black Winter Thermolite Boots Size 8Men's/Women's Skechers Women's Keepsakes-Animal Slouch Snow Boot High quality and cheap Trendy Modern and elegant ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    100% AUTHENTIC 29960 GIVENCHY HEELS - GIVENCHY BROWN LEATHER PEEP GIVENCHY GIVENCHY TOE BOOTIES 04cb591
    Heels
    >
    ;