Never miss an update

Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Diesel
Width: Medium (B, M) Material: Synthetic
Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.) Color: Pink
Country/Region of Manufacture: Vietnam Style: Low Top
Never miss an update

Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b - blurrypron.com

    Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b
    Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b
    NIKE LUNAREPIC LOW FLYKNIT 2 Women's shoes NEW with box. 863780 041. BLACK WHITE , Inov-8 F-Lite 240-U Cross-Trainer Shoe, Grey/Blue/White, 7.5 W US , Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v1 Running Shoe, Charm, 8 D US , PUMA PLATFORM EXOTSKIN BLACK GOLD SNAKE SUEDE WOMENS SIZE SNEAKERS 363377-01 , adidas Originals Superstar SMR 360 C Black White Kid Junior Casual Shoes DB0924Women's New Balance W990KM3 Running Shoe Brand New Made in the USA Breast Cancer , WOMEN'S BROOKS GLYCERIN 15 size 8 I!WORN AROUND 5 MILES! RUNNING! NO INSOLES! , NIB GUESS DAYLANA BLACK MULTI FABRIC WEDGE HEEL FASHION SNEAKERS SHOES SIZE 8-11Puma Vikky Platform Ribbon S Bow Black Bold Women Shoes Sneakers 366418-01 , Cole Haan Womens 15A4158 Canvas Low Top Slip On Fashion, Ironstone, Size 6.0Skechers 22535 Sport Womens Breathe Easy Allure Fashion SneakerCONVERSE "METALLICA" Black Leather High Tops Women's Size 5 Medium EUC , New Size 9.5 Women's Reebok Freestyle Hi Fitness Instinct Blue Fashion SneakersSkechers Empire-Sharp Thinking Grey Light Blue Women Running Shoes 12418-GYLB , Propet Women's Ridgewalker Low Boot, Gunsmoke Melon, 6.5 2E US , Reebok Aztec Og Varsity Athletic Women's Shoes Size , Nike Air Force 1 Hi SE Binary Blue/Muslin-Sail Denim 860544-400 Women's SZ 8.5 , Ryka Women's Hydro Sport Water Shoe-W, Detox Twinkle Blue/Chrome Silver, 10 M US , ENZO ANGIOLINI BECCALYNN Black Suede Designer Pumps Platforms 7.5 M , Asids Womens Gel-Solution Speed 3 White . New! Size 8 1/2Mizuno Wave Bolt 5 Women's White/Red 30204001 , Nike LunarCharge Essential Women's Running Shoes Night Maroon/Sail/Violet DustPleaser Women's Adore 701SRS Platform Slide Clear PVC/Gold Simulated Rhinestones , New Women's nike AIR MAX 1 ULTRA 2.0 FK MTLC Sohes Size 8.5 , Cole Haan Womens Alexissam Low Top Slip On Fashion Sneakers, Tan, Size 6.0Flexus by Spring Step Womens Ulisse Quarter Strap Sandal Navy Mesh Sport Sandals , Jessica Simpson Women's Sherron Ankle Strap Sandal Black/White Gingham Textile , Women's Nike Air Force 1 High Light Rave Pink Sample Shoe Size 7 , Nike Air Force 1 Hi Utility Khaki/Khaki-Light Bone AJ2775-200 Women's SZ 12 ,
    Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b - blurrypron.com>Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b - blurrypron.com
    VINTAGE SHOE CO $330 Kimberly BOOTS Made in USA Womens size 6.5 M Gray Suede NewFRYE Ilana Shootie Wood Brown Leather Suede Boots Slip On Ankle Booties W6.5 NEWnew $695 STUART WEITZMAN black smooth/quilted leather TALL BOOTS - fabulous , Dr Martens 5 Hole Oliver Black 14869001 Original DocNike Air Max 2017 Running Mens Shoes NWOB Night Maroon 849559-601 , Hush Puppies Yakira Black Knee High Boots , Aerosoles Drama Club Kitten Heel Pointed Toe Heels , Light PinkSpring Step L'artiste Chino Open Back Leather Clog Natural , Naturalizer Womens Brittany Leather Closed Toe Slide Flats, Coral, Size 11.0 , New KENNETH COLE REACTION Women Leather Black Heel Pump Shoe Sz 7.5 MNEW $980 DONNA KARAN COLLECTION CALFSKIN SEQUINS PLATFORM SHOES It. 36 - US 6MISSONI LUREX AND LEATHER DESIGNER MOTIFF PEEP TOES HEELS SHOES US 11 IT 41 , Antik Batik Klara espadrille Sandals New 38 8. Retails at $345Mr/Ms Nike Mens Rosherun Hyp Running Shoe fashion Ranked first in its class German Outlets , Lacoste Lerond 417 Mens Navy Leather & Textile TrainersNike Free Hypervenom Low FC men lifestyle casual sneakers NEW deep royal blueNike Air Max 1 "Snow Beach" - 875844 403NIKE SB BLACK PIGEON DUNK LOW (SIZE 11) 883232-008 RARE!! CONCEPTS UGLY SWEATERRoberto Serpentini 47205 Black Leather Zip-Up Ankle Boots 42 / US 9 , Stacy Adams Men's Melville Cognac Oxford Shoes 25010-221 , GRENSON Tom Brogue Black Burnished Balmorals Cap Toe Dress Shoes Dainite 8 NEW , NEW PUMA X FENTY BY RIHANNA BOW PINK TINT BEIGE LIFESTYLE SHOE WOMEN SIZE 5.5 , HOKA ONE ONE TRACER 2 CITRUS CYAN ROAD RUNNING SHOES, WOMEN US 7.5/ 39 1/3 ~NEW"White House/Black Market" Size 8 Ankle Boots .New.New Billabong Womens Jaftlbur Espresso Fashion Boots Size 8.5Marc Fisher Nella-P Taupe Fabric Over The Knee Boot Women’s Sz 9.5 M , Vince Camuto Basira Burly Brown Pull Up Leather Tall Riding Boots $229 NEW , Sporto Boots 6 suede boots 6 waterproof boots 6 weather proof boots 6 sporto , Womens Ladoes Autumn Winter Chic Floral Embroidery Ankle Boots Tassels Shoes hot , VINCE CAMUTO Womens 'Farren' Dark Gray Knee High Sz 9.5 Boots NEW! 218406
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Diesel Women's Women's W mogochinese-24020 Girlkode W Fashion Fandango Pink/Paloma/Black Sneakers Shoes 0d1ce8b
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;