Never miss an update

Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: good condition, fits US Size 11 but is closer a narrow fit or 10.5
Style: Slingback Sandals Width: Medium (B, M)
Fastening: Buckle Color: Multi-Color
US Shoe Size (Women's): 11 Brand: Jan Jansen
Material: Leather Heel Type: Block
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055 -

    Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055
    Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055
    Men/Women FRYE Women's Brielle Gladiator Dress Sandal durability Comfortable touch Recommended today , NWOB Sam Edelman Greta Shoes Thongs Flip Flops Sandals 12 12M 12B 42 NEWMERRELL ENOKI FLIP 2 COMFORT FLIP FLOPS SANDALS WOMENS ICE PALE GRAY 11Gentlemen/Ladies Fidela Black Franco Sarto Sandal Many styles Moderate cost Vintage tide shoesHot Rhinestones Buckle Women Flip Flops Sandal Gladiator Pearls Hollow Out Shoes , Via Spiga Norine Womens Leather Dress Sandals Shoes Size 5.5 $259NEW Free People Balkan Black Leather & Tapestry Sandals 37 , 9M Women's Teva Multicolored Blue Casual Sport Adjustable Walking Sandal , $118 Eric Michael Hylena Amanda Sandals 40 9 NIB , COLE HAAN ORIGINAL GRAND GLADIATOR, SIZE 7.5, NWTFranco Sarto Women's Tula Wedge Sandal Peach Leather Size 10 M , La Plume Brooke Double Strap Black Leather wedge heel slide Euro 36LOUISE ET CIE NIB Lo Braylee Dark Brown Leather Gladiator Sandal Sz 5.5 B4510spring step naila Wedge Sandals Champagne Leather Size 40 (US:9)Sacha London Black suede booties 4" heelNAOT 40 PEWTER ANKLE STRAP SANDALS WOMEN USA SIZE 9 - 9.5 M MADE IN ISRAELVia Spiga Leatrice Black Suede Perforated Sandals Wedges - Size 8M US , Wooden clogs Black color Swedish style . F11 US Shoe Size (Women's) , Free People Women's Monaco Navy Stripe Ankle Wrap Clogs Retail $168 size 6Jeffrey Campbell Black Leather Cordoba Studded Slingback Sandals Size 6 $130 , New Teva Women's Original Universal Rope - Size 7 - Spring 2017- Free ShippingAqua Women's Dehli Caged Espadrille Sandals Natural/Pink Leather Size 10 MMadison Harding Women’s Jackson Strappy Platform Sandal Tobacco Brown suede NEW , BCBGeneration Fizzy Womens Cuoio Leather Open Toe Stacked Heel Sandals size 8.5Gentleman/Lady Jambu Viola Sandal, 7 Excellent value online shop Pick up at the boutiqueGentleman/Lady Women's Remonte, R3760 Wedge Sandals Beautiful design The latest technology Fair price , ZARA BALLERINAS WITH STRAPS /39/40 US 7.5/8/9 REF. 1331/101 NWT!!! , Cole Haan Amavia Womens Optic White/Optic White Croc Slip On Sandals size 7.5 , Vince Camuto Women's Retana Wedge Sandal, Black, 5.5 M US
    Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055 ->Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055 -
    Ladies Navy Tory Burch Miler Riding Boot size 10Man's/Woman's FREEBIRD COBLE BOOT BLACK SIZE 6 High security Orders are welcome Good qualityVISVIM Hockney G.Sausalito Line Patent Leather Blue Boat Deck Shoes - US 11 , Asics Gel-Lyte V 'Core Plus Pack' unisex sneaker shoes trainersMen/Women Ladies Clarks Loafers Shoes Griffin Milly economic Fast delivery Modern and elegantSkechers Womens/Ladies Synergy 2.0 High Spirits Trainers (FS4432) , Skechers BOBS Women's Plush-Studious Cats Ballet Flat Slip-On Summer SandalJ/Slides Alara Leather Pull On Sneakers, Black SIZE 10NEW!! Sam Edelman Blue Stripe Sandals 4" Block Heels Size 8.5M US 38.5M EUR , Salvatore Ferragamo Boutique Womens 10 AAAA Croc Embossed Kiltie Pumps GreenRALPH LAUREN WOMENS SHOES 9.5 LATISHA DARK BROWN EMBOSSED CROC NEW IN BOX , Dansko Fern Brown Leather Buckle Studded Wedge Sandals 37 Women's US 6.5 - 7Roborovski Hamster (Black/White) Running Shoes For Women-Free Shipping , New Men's Nike SB Blazer Vapor TXT Size 8.5 Wolf Grey Skateboarding ShoesMen's Asics Gel Lyte Speed Athletic Fashion Sneakers H614N Grey/Black/OrangeMan's/Woman's tubular shadow Complete specification range High quality and economy King of the crowdDS Adidas Real Deal Iridescent Black Vivid Pink Blue Joy G67407 crazy 1 8 kobe , New KEEN Mens Austin Chocolate Brown Hiking Shoes Size 8.5 , Gentleman/Lady Air Jordan Retro Size 15 High-quality high quality valueMen/Women 15 Pairs of basketball shoes Strong heat and wear resistance Beautiful appearance Different goods , Caterpillar Men's Revolver Pull-On Soft Toe Boot - Choose SZ/ColorHarley-Davidson Men's Keating Motorcycle Boots. Black, Brown, or Wheat D93377NIKE SFB SPECIAL FIELD 8" MENS SIZE 12.5 BOOTS MILITARY BRITISH KHAKI 631371-220 , UNDER ARMOUR INFIL OPS GTX TACTICAL BOOTS 1287948 - ALL SIZES - NEWPropet Women's Washable Walker Walking Shoe, SR White, 6.5 2E USNike Women's Metcon 3 MTLC 922880-001 Size: 7, 9 , Asics Women's Gel-Nimbus 19 (2A) Narrow Running Shoe , Harley Davidsons Womens Motorcycle Boots 5 Black Leather Buckles Shoes Heels , VANELi Womens jonele Leather Pointed Toe Ankle Chelsea Boots Black Size 9.5 kG , Womens Genuine Leather Pointy Toe Ankle Boots Oxfords Shoes Low Heel Military SI ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Jan Double Jansen Rare Double Ankle Wrap Leather Slingback Slingback Sandal Leather Shoes d630055