Never miss an update

Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc

Item specifics

New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
UK Shoe Size (Women's): 8 US / 6 UK
Exact Heel Height: Not specified Brand: Charles by Charles David
Heel Type: Slim MPN: Reform-WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB
Product ID: 636535180926 Style: Riding, Equestrian
Width: Standard (B) Main Colour: Beige
Occasion: Casual Pattern: Solid
UPC: 636535180926 EAN: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc -

    Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc
    Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc
    Redback Boots Crazy Horse Brown UBCH Leather Chelsea Boot , Born Alter Womens Boots Grey Suede 11 US / 9 UK , Bates mens Lites Closed Toe Oxfords, Black, Size 12 D) US US / , Steve Madden Womens Kennee Leather Open Toe Ankle Fashion BootsKodiak Women's Rochelle Snow Boot, Red, Size 7.0 US / 5 UK , Tommy Hilfiger Corporate Belt Rain Womens Chocolate Wellington Boots - 41 EU , Mr/Ms LADIES CLARKS INTOUR ROUTE WALKING BOOT Quality queen Sales Italy Various latest designsDolce Vita Women's Melah Boot, Black, Size 8.5 US / 6.5 UKMan's/Woman's Naturalizer Women's Jacklyn Ankle Boots wholesale High-quality materials cheap price , Milwaukee Motorcycle Clothing Company paragon Womens Boots Black 7.5 US / 5.5 UICEBUG Daphne Womens Boots Black 6 US / 4 UKNine West Womens Boots Black Synthetic 5 US / 3 UK , Nine West Falup Womens Boots Black FB 7 US / 5 UKGrinders Rare Waxy Renegade Low Ladies Biker Brown Leather Western Boots CowgirlDiba Womens lake land Closed Toe Ankle Fashion BootsH by Hudson Women's Horrigan Boot, Beige, Size 6.0 US / 4 UK , Alfani pippaa Womens Boots Black 8.5 US / 6.5 UKCarolinna Espinosa Womens Eryca Leather Pointed Toe Knee High Fashion Boots , Attilio Giusti Leombruni Agl Ladies Ankle Boots Shoes Size 36 Leather Np 260 New , H By Hudson Apisi Womens Boots Grey Velvet 8 US / 6 UKMan/Woman Lucky Women's LK-Loreniah Fashion Boot Modern technology Quality and quantity guaranteed Very practical , Latigo Virgo Womens Boots Amber 9.5 US / 7.5 UKCharles David Women's Prism Ankle Boot, Taupe, Size 9.0 US / 7 UKJack Rogers marianne Womens Boots Midnight 7 US / 5 UKCamper Kobo K400214 Womens Boots Brown 11 US / 9 UKLadies Clarks Casual Ankle winter Boots 'Orinoco Art' , Woolrich Women's Koosa Winter Boot, Black/Herringbone, Size 10.0 US / 8 UKForte Women's Boots Shoes Leather Black Budapest Pattern High Shaft Np 365 New , Mr/Ms SoftWalk Women's Hanover Ankle Bootie Innovative design Year-end sale List of explosions ,
    Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc ->Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc -
    Spot On Womens/Ladies Flat Knee High Boots (KM687) , Reebok Furylite New Woven Black White Womens Running Shoes V70798Under-Sand-Able Kenneth Cole Shoes Fashion Black Men New , Ana Lublin Mary Jane Platform Heels Patent Leather Shoes Khaki Sizes 39 40 41 , Gentlemen/Ladies Demonia STAR-25 Fine processing Ranked first in its class leading the fashion , Womens Pointy Toe Hollow Out Cow Leather Sports Slip On Sandals Flats Shoes size , Cole Haan Womens Kent Loafer II Closed Toe, Black/Black Ironstone, Size 6.0JSlides J Slides Ariana Light Grey Snake Embossed Slip On Sneaker shoes NewKlogs Austin Taupe Suede Tapestry Clog Size 9.5 , Clarks Janey June Womens Mary Jane Flat- Choose SZ/Color.Steve Madden Daisie Pump - Women's Size 8.5M - Light Pink DAMAGEDGiuseppe Zanotti 7.5 Made In Italy Black Patent Leather Peep Heels Women's Shoe , Skechers Cali Women's Monarchs Blue Nights Wedge Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , Nike Air Huarache Run Black/Black-White Women's 634835-006 SZ 6.5Vans Style 23 V 2 Tone Leather Gunmetal sz Mens 8 / Womens 9.5 NIB , NIKE MENS FREE RN FLYKNIT RUNNING SHOES (BOX NO LID)NIKE DUNK LOW PREMIUM SB USED SIZE 7.5 YELLOW CURB FOG YELLOW 313170 010 , Nike Air Zoom Hyperposite 2 Rift Blue/Orange 653466-482 Men's Size 9.5 , Mens ADIDAS EQT SUPPORT ADV PK Black Running Trainers CM7191 , Jordan AJ Future Men's Gym Red/White 56503601Nike Air Max 97 Metallic Gold Size 8 USMens Shoes Julius Marlow Brazen Black Leather Pull On Business BootsBALENCIAGA Triple S Men's Blue Red Gray Oversized Trainers Sneakers US 11NEW men's SZ 10 D HOFFMAN'S Insulated Calk boots black Rubber waterproof bottom , Hush Puppies Men's Henning Workday Black Leather Oxford Comfort Dress Shoe 1477 , RALPH LAUREN PURPLE LABEL White Leather LOW-TOP Fashion Sneakers EUR-43 US-10 , British Slip On Formal Dress Metal Pointy Toe Casual Leather Business Mens ShoesECCO Women's Intrinsic 2 Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , SALOMON XA PRO 3D GTX W Women's Trail Running Shoes Hiking FREE SHIPPING 393329 , Womens Knit Pointed Toe Shoes Boots Rhinestone Slim Low Heels Leather Sequins ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Charles 6 by Boots Charles David Reform Womens Reform Boots WNTRWHT SNAKE EMB 8 US/ 6 UK 5cc9edc