Never miss an update

CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33




Item specifics

Condition:
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Clarks
Exact Heel Height: Not specified MPN: Glick Elmfield-Black Combi
Heel Type: Wedge Style: Riding, Equestrian
Product ID: 889305471339 Main Colour: Black
Width: Standard (B) Pattern: Solid
Occasion: Casual
Never miss an update

CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33 - blurrypron.com

    CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33
    CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33
    John Lewis Philomena Zip Up Hiker Boots, Brown BNIB size 5,6, 8ZARA BLACK REAL LEATHER BIKER ANKLE BOOTS SHOES STUD BUCKLE CHAIN COAT NEWIvanka Trump Womens Smith Suede Closed Toe Knee High Fashion BootsPleaser Electra 3000 Black Stretch Lycra Thigh High 5 Inch Heel Platform Boots , Ariat Skyline Mid GTX Zip Walking Boots - & 4 left - Down to .95Mr/Ms Ladies Rieker Ankle Boots 70562 Clearance price Fine art Maintenance capability , Bumper Zebra Bianco Italian Boots Size 2 NEW in Bashed Box Slim Calf Fit , Justin Reece Ava Women Leather Red Ankle BootsMammal Sol OC Grey Womens Winter Snow Boots With Fold Away Anti Slip Spikes , Men's/Women's Pleaser ADORE-3050 Modern and elegant fashion high quality Good qualityWomens Shoes Long Fringed Personality Retro Chic Wedge Leather Knee High BootsLadies Rieker Rounded Toe Leather Zip Up Heeled Ankle Boots 70562Womens Office Aloud Point Block Heel Boots BLACK CROC PATENT Boots , Gentleman/Lady Demonia CHARADE-206 bargain Stylish and fun Superb craftsmanshipCLARKS **Reunite Go GTX Mid Brown Suede **Women's WATERPROOF Boots RRP , Fly London Women's Mong Oil Suede / Rug Leather Zip Ankle Boot Navy / Dark BrownMen's/Women's Demonia SHAKER-72 durable online shop Vintage tide shoesLaura Biagiotti 5100 Women Ladies Shoes Woman Boots BrownMen/Women Loeffler Randall 'Fenton' Rain Booties Promotion Strong value Speed ​​refund , Women's Remonte Dorndorf Chestnut Leather Ankle Boot , LADIES HARLEY- DAVIDSON BLACK MID CALF LEATHER BIKER BOOTS STYLE - BAISLEYClarks Originals Womens * Wallabee Boot Off White Hexa Unisex * DMen's/Women's Demonia SHAKER-100 Long-term reputation Skilled manufacturing Popular tide shoesThe Little Mermaid Ursula Tentacles Variant WOMEN'S Martin Boots Disney Villains , New Wanted Vascoe Womens Shoes Boots Ankle , Amblers Steel FS219 Safety Pull On / Womens Boots / Riggers Safety (FS1023) , Womens Office Auburn High Cut Unlined Boots NATURAL SNAKE LEATHER BootsTaryn Rose Womens Trisha Suede Closed Toe Ankle Fashion Boots , New Women's Back Zip Casual Low Heel Over Knee High Boots Pointed Toe Pleated ,
    CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33 - blurrypron.com>CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33 - blurrypron.com
    NEW SAM EDELMAN PENNY BLACK LEATHER BACK ZIP KNEE HIGH RIDING BOOTS WOMEN'S 12 M , Eastland Women's Jezebel 1955 Boot, Black, 6 M US , rag & bone - 'Kinsey' Bootie- Camel- Size 7 US/ 37.5EU $598 , Brooks Transcend 4 Mens Running Shoe (D) (002) | Brand New!Brand New Repetto Paris Cendrillon Ballet Flat Black Nappa LeatherMen's/Women's Eastland Womens Boat Shoe- Pick SZ/Color. Not so expensive First batch of customers cheaper , Bowknot Women High Block Heel Open Toe Slippers Summer Sandal Shoes Summer Lit01 , Women's Marc Fisher KAEE Espadrille Wedge Sandal Heels Suede Insignia Blue 9.5New Tory Burch Seashore Heels/Sandals 105MM size10.5 medium newMan's/Woman's Crocs Isabella Mini Wedge Bronze Charming design new classic style , New Andacco Twine Womens Comfortable Flat Leather Sandals Made In Brazil , Women Reebok CM9366 Royal EC Ride tw Casual shoes black sneakers , Puma Trinomic XT 2 Plus Bluebird/Spectrum Blue 355868 08 Men's SZ 10Sanuk Chiba TX Sidewalk Surfer - Black / Natural - New , Puma EvoSPEED Electric Spike Usain Bolt Sprint Running Track Shoes SpikesNew Balance Men's Visaro 2.0 Control FG Soccer Shoe, - Choose SZ/ColorNew Balance Men's Fresh Foam Zante V3 Breathe Pack Running Shoe , Air Jordan 11 Low Derek Jeter RE2PECT AV2187-441 BINARY BLUE/SAIL US 11 , Black and Gold Leather Giuseppe Sneakers Size CAD 11Vans Sk8-Hi Reissue VN-0ZA0EWB Leather True White Casual Shoes Medium (D,M) MenMens Real Leather Embroidery Wolf Driving Moccasins Loafers Shoes NewMan/Woman Propet Otto - Black - Mens Rich design Beautiful appearance Elegant and solemn , Sanders Men brown cap toe oxford full grain leather shoes Made in England 8.5Mens Classical Pointy Toe Leather Wedding Dress Formal Oxfords Shoes Fashion , Women's New Balance Running Vazee Coast Grey Blue/White WCOASGP New In Box sizes , Nike Internationalist JCRD WNTR 859544-900 Metallic Running Shoes Women's 7.5Hoka One One Women's Bondi 4 WIDE Hydrangea/Sunny Lime Running Shoe 5.5 D , Patricia Green Women's Starr Ballerina Flat Platino Suede Business ShoesNike Zoom All Out Flyknit Women's Wolf Grey/White/Black/Pure Platinum 45361003 , Sonoma Leeza Chestnut Brown Suede Leather Ankle Boots Womens Size 10 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    CLARKS Womens Fur Glick Elmfield Faux Fur Womens Toe Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots 0232d33
    Boots
    >
    ;