Never miss an update

AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: New shoes
Brand: AnnaKastle - KARA Width: Medium (B, M)
Style: Slipper Shoes Material: Leather
Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.) Pattern: Solid
Never miss an update

AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca -

    AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca
    AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca
    HAFLINGER RADL BLACK SCHWARZ SLIPPERS WOOL FELT MEN'S WOMEN'S WITH BIKE UNISEX , Haflinger DOGGY Womens Doggy Applique Slipper- Choose SZ/Color. , Girls Frontline Cosplay Shoes Gothic Lolita Blue Boots PTRD cosHaflinger AT TAHOE Womens Tahoe Slip On Slipper /10- Choose SZ/Color. , Geox Respira Black Ankle Strap Wedge Heel Shoe Size 6 US. EUR. 36ACORN Women's Ewe Collar Mule Ash 9 M USHAFLINGER WOMEN'S BICYCLE, INDOOR WOOL SLIPPERSMan/Woman BEARPAW Women's Loki Slide Slipper High grade modern Fashion versatile shoesBIRKENSTOCK MEN'S/WOMEN'S FLIP FLOPS MADRID PULL UP VEG LINE ANTHRACITE-STONE-OL , EMU Australia Women's Talinga, Chestnut, 6 M US , BOBS from Skechers Womens Bobs Alpine Puddle Jump Cozy Winter Boot , Haflinger Grizzly Franzi Womens Slippers Mules Sandals Clogs Wool Felt SlidesHaflinger Women's GZL46 MuleEarth44 BR/13 M US , Stegmann Women's Wool Clog Graphite 9.5 M US , Womens Flat Slip On Loafer Mules Shoes Buckle Fashion Summer Slingback SlippersDesigual Authentic Women's Velvet Bailerine Fresa Ballet Slippers 26bs403 , NIB ITASCA LEATHERGOODS WOMEN'S TRIMBELLE CINNAMON MOCCASIN W/LONG FRINGE- SALE!BOBS from Skechers 31231 Womens Keepsakes High Slip On SlipperNew Womens Peep Toe Plaform Wedge Heels Shoes Slipper Sandals summer Sexy , Adidas CM8167 Women Adilette slippers Ankle Wrap sandals black sand , HALLUX ORTHOPEDICS ACUPRESSURE SLIMMING MASSAGE SHOES SLIPPERS CALCANEAL SPURSDaniel Green Women's Glamour SlipperBlack Kidskin8.5 N , LL Bean Wicked Good Lodge Boot Wool Women's 9 , Embroidered Women Mules Block Heel Slippers Pointy Toe Loafer Vogue Velvet ShoesWarmbat Australia Polarfox Suede Women Scuffs & Mules slippers warm comfy - NEW , Sanita Wood Julie closed Womens Shoes Sandals Clogs leather wooden sole - NEWSlippers and clogs Fendi Women - Fabric (8X6517ODD)MIU MIU women shoes Velvet ardesia slip on metallic silver cap toe and swarovskyCrocs Sloane Embellished Slide Female Synthetic Black/Multi Black
    AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca ->AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca -
    Calvin Klein Womens Jeremi Knee High Boot- Pick SZ/Color.Man's/Woman's NEW STEVE MADDEN WOMENS RANDI Beautiful color Beautiful Comfortable and naturaladidas Alphabounce AMS M Aramis White Grey Men Running Shoes Sneakers BW0427 , Skechers BOBS Women's Alpine - City Creek Boot, - Choose SZ/Color , Aravon Women's WSM06BG-Disc Mary Jane Flat - Choose SZ/ColorNine West Anima Tionzu Black Flat Suede Women's Size 7M New , Cole Haan Women's Pin Weekender LX Penny Loafer - Choose SZ/Color , WOMENS GIANVITO ROSSI MARCY BLACK SUEDE OPEN TOE SLINGBACK CORK SANDALS 37.5/7.5 , Gentlemen/Ladies Jean-Paul GAULTIER Leather Pumps Size 22.5(K-60978) New product Excellent performance Global sales , NWOB Manolo Blahnik Brown Suede Pointy Toe Pumps/Bow/Kitten Heels/Shoes 36 $565Sam Edelman Liliana Wedge Sandal - Women's Size 6.5M Camel BrownMens Adidas Superstar Blue White Sneakers Size 6.5 Or 39 1/3 EuroBrand New Nike Runallday Black/Black/Anthracite Running Shoe 898464 002 Size 12Nike Hypershift Low Basketball Men's Shoes Size 13 , Adidas Men's NMD_R2 Grey/Future Harvest Running Sneaker Shoes BY3014 Sz 10.5 NEW , Nike Tiempo Legend 7 Academy FG Men's Soccer Cleats Shoes AH7242-107 1805 , NIKE AIR JORDAN SON OF LOW DARK SEA-GYM RED-BLACK-WHITE SZ 12 [580603-303][asics] VOLLEY ELITE FF MT Black Men's Volleyball Shoes TVR714.90952011 Nike Air Jordan XIV Retro Last Shot Black/Red Size 11 311832-010 , 1661571-227 Columbia Mens Grand Canyon OutDry Hiking Sneakers- Choose SZ/Color.Rockport Men's Manning Park Slip On, Dawn, 9.5 M , Nautica Men's Wake Driving Style Loafer - Choose SZ/ColorBrooks Womens Neuro 2 Blue Running Shoes Size 8 (25298) , INC International Concepts Fawne Riding Boots Size 6.5 Black Leather Retail $180Finn Comfort Women's Ikebukuro Black Hardy/Nappa Seda , Lauren by Ralph Lauren Mesa Wide Calf Riding Boots 445, Dark Brown/Dark Brown,Manas MICHELA, boots femme, Elfenbein , 36 EU ////SOLDE\\\\ - , Pleaser 6" hot pink open toe open back ankle boots , Demonia 5" Platform Faux Black Suede w/ Fur Trim Knee Boots 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 , NEW Tory Burch Black Leather Booties Ankle High Heel Boots 8.5 M ~ Stretch Panel
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    AnnaKastle Womens Genuine Suede mogochinese-9342 Leather Clog US Slingback Sandal US Womens 5 6 7 8 0cae3ca