Never miss an update

Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59

Item specifics

: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Celine
Heel Type: 3.5" Style: Booties
Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up) MPN: Does Not Apply
Material: Leather Color: Black
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7.5 UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59 -

    Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59
    Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59
    LE SILLA NEW DESIGNER GREEN KID LEATHER PUMP 36DOC DR MARTENS ORANGE BOOT MADE IN ENGLAND RARE VINTAGE UNISEX 6.5UK US:8.5W7.5MNIB $285 Freebird by Steven Lion Women's Leather Ankle Boot Brown Cognac Sz 10 , Womens Pikolinos Boots Zaragoza Ankle Boots Brandy Brown NEWRag & Bone Harrow Belted Leather Woven Ankle Boot. Size 39TRIPPEN Germany - Women's PENNA Medieval Boots TREASURE f wine-red EU42 US11 UK9 , FLY London Women's HOTA125FLY Ankle Boot, Brick Oil Suede/Rug, 38 M USStuart Weitzman Tieland Walnut Suede OTK Boot Size 7M E522 , Frye 77547 Dorado Brown Leather Western Cowgirl Riding Boots Women's Size 7 , NEW Frye 'Tabitha' Harness Back Zip Bootie Boots - Grey - 8.5 B - 77944 (C53)Guiseppe Zanotti Suede Over The Knee Thigh High Boots Size 40 USA 9.5 10$875 Mercedes Castillo Aymeline Black Leather Over Knee Boots Booties Shoe 6.5 , Women's FRYE Engineer Boots 12"R in Black Made in USAFrye Maxine Loop Size 7.5 Pull-On Brown Leather Knee High Riding BootsDOLCE & GABBANA Italy Woman's Pink Crocodile Leather Rubber Rainboots Boots 8 7LA CANADIENNE VICKY Taupe Suede Designer Boots Winter 5.0 M , Givenchy bootie leather black gold trim boots. Size 40 1/2 US 10Womens Red Studded Leather Cowgirl Boots Black Overlay Pointed Toe , Christian Louboutin Gray Canvas "Corazon" Espadrille Wedge Booties SZ 40Bottes vintage d' origine 1982 -- Marron foncé -- CAREL -- T. 38,5 , JOSEF SEIBEL Tracy Velour Kombi Taupe Leather Boots Shoes US 8 - 8.5 M NWB , Ariat Womens Round up Remuda Western Cowboy Boot- Select SZ/Color. , ALLROUNDER by MEPHISTO ARINA BLACK WINTER BOOT WATERPROOF SIZE 10 , Jessica Simpson Women's Teddi Fashion Boot, Natural, 9 Medium US , Boulet Puma Turqueza Cowgirl Boot - Snip Toe Blue 8 MJIMMY CHOO Black Suede Pointed Toe Boots Size 37.5Harley-Davidson Women's Eddington Work Boot, Black, 7.5 M US$420 WOW~Stuart Weitzman Slate Gray Suede Platform Booties Size 7.5 , $1595 BALENCIAGA Brown Patent Leather Suede Ankle Booties Women's SZ 37.5 SALE! ,
    Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59 ->Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59 -
    Justin Womens L2659 Vintage Wildfire Orange Western Cowgirl Boots 9B New USAECCO Women's Soft 7 Quilted High Top Fashion Sneak - Choose SZ/colorSalomon - Sense Pro Trail Running Shoe - Lucite Green/White/Peacock BlueStar Boots Western W9210 Burgandy Karunga Snake Size 8.5 B NEWMen's/Women's Naot Reserve in Black Combo economic Highly praised and appreciated by the consumer audience As of the latest modelJ Crew Sadie Flats in Suede 10 Vibrant Flame Red Shoes F4976 NEWCole Haan Womens Aprilsam Cap Toe Mary Jane Flats, Gold Glitter, Size 6.0 , NURTURE Gold Laser Cut Leather Peep Toe Slingback Heels Size 8MBadgley Mischka Amber Womens Dress Pump- Choose SZ/Color. , ReJois by Gianni Lorenzi 050i Dark Violet Patent Leather Heels 38 / US 8 , Christian Louboutin Daffodil Pumps High Heel Platform Suede Black 35.5 / 5 , VANS Authentic Checkerboard Black/Jet Black Slate Slip-onNike Lunarepic Low FK2 X-Plore Men’s Running, Training Shoes 904742-100 SZ 11.5 , Jordan 4 Retro LS Oreo (2015) DS Size 10 New With Box 314254 003 , Los Altos Genuine BROWN Ostrich Square Toe Western Cowboy Boot EE+ , Brand New Frye Men's Allen Tie Suede Loafer Sz 9M , Keen Targhee Exp Mid Men's Waterproof Boot Black/Steel Gray 1017715 Size 9.5 , Mens Oxfords Business Casual Shoes Genuine Leather Handmade Lightweight and for , Man/Woman Skechers Work Mens Telfin-Sanphet SR Special purchase special promotion At an affordable price , Reebok F/S FreeStyle Jr Pink Orange Yellow Womens Big Girls Hi Shoes SizesVans x Toy Story Authentic Woody Bo Peep Disney Women's Size 6-7 NewWomen's Air Jordan 11 Retro Low -CHOOSE SIZE- AH7860-105 Rose Gold Red Bronze XIWomens Air Presto PRM Premium Max Orange Black SZ 11 / Mens 9.5 (878071-800) , Nike Air Foamposite One - Beige - Womens , Gentleman/Lady Easy Spirit Women's Takeit Mule Cheap Trendy Excellent function , SHEEP FEET BOOT **SPECIAL** - CHESTNUT BOOT/BROWN SOLE - MIDDr. Doc Martens 8-Eyelet 1460W Purple Blue Lilac Hightop Boots US 7 , NEW Kaitlyn Pan Women’s Grey Suede Heel Over the Knee Boots US 6 M Shoes A902Regence Womens Boots Knee-High US 7 B Black Leather Pull On Lined waterproofNaughty Monkey Leather Women's Noe Fringe Tan Heeled Booties NWB $130
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Celine Womens Booties Heels Size mogochinese-29996 37.5 7.5 Leather Black Leather 37.5 Zip Up b8e5f59