Never miss an update

Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Great condition! There is light wear to the soles of these boots as pictured.
Accents: Buckles Pattern: Solid
Style: Ankle Boots Features: Zip
Boot Shaft Height: Ankle EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 39
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 9 Color: Black
Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.) Brand: Dansko
Material: Leather Toe Type: Round Toe
Width: Medium (B, M) Heel Type: Chunky
Never miss an update

Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e - blurrypron.com

    Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e
    Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e
    Eileen Fisher Floret Cage Open Bootie Size 6.5 (Retail $245) , John Fluevog Size 7.5 Slouchy Gray Leather Knee High Red Heel BootsUlu Akna Rabbit Fur Winter Show Insulated Driving Waterproof Boots Women's US 11 , NEW Jean Michel Cazabat Colorblock ankle boots Purple Tri color suede booties 9Dolce Vita Jimmy Women's black suede thigh high boots size 8 Tall Stretch Zipper , Man's/Woman's Frye Boot ilana short Guarantee quality and quantity New style Selling new productsAPC Caramel Tan Beige Suede Leather VE Ankle Block Heel Cowboy Boots Booties 11 , Pleaser Women's Ado1019/wpu/m Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Steve Madden Women's Carrie Fashion Boot Black Suede 7.5 M US , Women's Propet Madison Tall Zip W4411 Espresso Size 8.5M , Bos. & Co. Water Resistent Suede Pull on Ankle Boots Belfield Gray EU42 10.5-11 , Reba Size 7.5 Black Suede Leather Boots New Womens ShoesPleaser 3 3/4" Heel Goth Lolita Boots Bows Women Blk Vegan Leather-Velvet , Nine West Women's Trurman Knee-High Boot,Black Leather,10 M US , Banana Republic Maddox Moto Bootie, BLACK SIZE 8.5 MFRYE Women's Jenna Cut Studs Distressed Leather Short Boots SZ 6 NEW!Womens TONY LAMA Two Tone Brown Leather Western Cowboy Boots Size 6.5 BWomens Merrell Eventyr Vera Mid Polar Brown Waterproof Snow Boots Size 9.5 New!Frye Harness 12R Distressed Brown Pull On Leather Boots Women's Size 8.5 , JOIE Womens Sva-2738 Black Fashion Boots Size 9 (425387)NEW Frye & Co. womens 9 M Sarah Shortie Elephant Brown pull-on Suede ankle boots , Smoky Mountain Women's Willow Cowgirl Boot Snip Toe Tan 8.5 M USNIB $325 Joie Dalton Suede Stacked Heel Bootie (US 10 )John Fluevog Earth Angel Ankle Boots Men's US.7 UK.6.5 EU.40-Women's US.9 , Vasque Women's Boots Hiking Leather Lug Sole Mountaineering 70's Vintage 6 , J. Crew Barrett Suede Brown Ankle Boots #A9825 Deep Maple Brown 7 ITALY $258Charles David Women's Maddie Ankle Boot, Black, 37.5 Medium EU (7.5 US) , Wolverine Roxana Womens Leather Ankle Boots, Brown Floral, US 8, Runs small , Skechers Women's You-14959 Sneaker - Choose SZ/color ,
    Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e - blurrypron.com>Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e - blurrypron.com
    Abilene Women's, Dakota Cowhide, Brown Western Bootie, (10 M, Brown) , Nike Air Max Flair Mens Running Trainers 942236 Sneakers Shoes 007Nike Jordan Relentless Black Red Men Cross Training Shoes Sneakers AJ7990-003 , Adidas Duramo 7 W [BA8068] Women Running Shoes Light Purple/White-MagentaWomens GEOX RESPIRA Euro white leather moccasins loafers sz. 39Born Lilly Bronze Suede Flat - size 6.5ARRAY Womens Freedom Leather Square Toe Loafers, Coral, Size 7.5 feBlTrotters Women's Lauren Nude 3D Slip-on ShoesWomen's RALPH LAUREN Black Leather Pumps Size 8 B , AUTH HOGAN SZ 40 / 10 BROWN SUEDE PATENT LEATHER PLATFORM WEDGE HEELS ANKLE BOOT , Man/Woman Dee Wife Perfetta High security International choice List of explosions , Rhinestones Womens Open Toe Sandal Wedding Ankle Strap Block Flower New Shoes , Mr/Ms Funtasma Women's Love 270 Yellow Patent Diverse new design Skilled manufacturing Authentic guarantee , Vans Authentic Black Premium Leather 9.5 Men's SizeConverse 84 Thunderbolt Ox Men Szs Black White 155612C Retro Runner Street Style , Nike Dunk Hi Lr Basketball Men's Shoes Size 7New in Box Puma Ferrari Drift CAT 6 NM Men's Shoes BLACK/White SHIP FREE FAST US , Nike Mens Air Max 2017 Maroon Red 849559-601 Running Shoes Size 13Nike Kobe X 10 Elite SE "What The" Basketball Shoes -Size 10.5 -815810 900 , Nocona Black Leather Cowboy Boots Mens Size 9 D Style 80388 USA , LOS ALTOS BLACK GENUINE OSTRICH LEG 3X TOE WESTERN COWBOY BOOT EE , Klogs Dusty Unisex Clogs Chestnut - 11 Medium , 75% OFF NEW MERCANTI FIORENTINI Bamboo Bit Loafer Tan sz 8 $295 , Allen Edmonds "CORNWALLIS" Oxfords 11.5 D Chili (492)NIB PUMA Women's Fierce EVOKNIT DARK PURPLE / WHITE SIZE US 6 129$ , Skechers Performance Women's Go Run Ride 6 Running ShoeBlack/White11 M US , Nike Air Force 1 HI SE Denim Womens 860544-400 Binary Blue Gum Shoes Size 6Saucony S10348-2 Womens Hurricane ISO 3 Running Shoe- Choose SZ/Color. , AUTHENTIC Nike Air Max 97 Ultra 2017 SE Black White Red AH6806 005 Women sizeNIB Anthropologie JASPER JEERA Triangle Trails Boots Leather Italy 38 8 SOLD OUT
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Women's Dansko Black Ankle Leather Zip-Up Ankle Silver Boots w/ 29991 Silver Buckles Size 39 2530b9e
    Boots
    >
    ;