Never miss an update

Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2




Item specifics

Condition:
: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Columbia
Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.) Fastening: Hook & Loop Fasteners
Style: Snow, Winter Boots US Shoe Size (Women's): 8
Color: White and pink
Never miss an update

Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2 - blurrypron.com

    Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2
    Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2
    Polo Sport Boots Women Rubber Ralph Lauren Black Red Lining Knee High Size 7B , Justin Boots Gypsy Collection L9610 Women's Boot Sz 9.5B , NEW LADIES Gray Round Toe Winter SEXY Mid-Calf Boot Size 7Sporto Time Again 2 Water-Resistant Suede Bootie, Grey 11W , RALPH LAUREN QUINLY Tall Winter Boots Womens Red Black 6.5 NEW IN BOXAldo Wos Boots Tall EU40 Beige Leather Textured Zip Lined Pointy Toe Heels 2087New SKECHERS Highlanders - Polar Bear Waterproof Women Boots Sz 8 , The North Face Thermoball Boots Booties Microbaffle II Winter Waterproof Women 7 , Clarks Black Leather Chris Ava Button Ankle Boot 9.5 W NEWSteve Madden Northpol Round Toe Synthetic Rain Boot Womens Size 7M GreenDan Post Womens Shoes Size 9.5 Brown Embroidered Leather Cowboy Western Boots , Naturalizer Transform Women's Brown Riding Boot 9N , Womens Black Lacy 5" Stiletto High Heel Pointy Toe Sexy Knee Boots Size 9ENZO ANGIOLINI Daniana Wide Calf Brown Leather Riding Boots sz 6.5 Retail $199 , FRYE CAMPUS Brown Leather Tall Boots Equestrian Stacked Heel Womens 8 1/2 B , MATISSE USED WOMEN'S LEATHER TALL FASHION RIDING BOOTS US 8, , Bandolino BDCale Black Brown Leather Riding Boots - Size 10 - BNIBNEW VINCE CAMUTO ZANDRA SZ 8.5 SUEDE ANKLE WEDGE BOOTIEClarks Originals Womens 6M Othello Sonnet Red Suede Fur Inner Ankle Boot 61557 , 2018 Women Check Block High Heels Ankle Boot Sexy Prom Colorful Zip Pump ShoesWomen's down cotton thicken over knee high boots waterproof slip on shoes Z507 , $200 BCBGeneration Womens BG-Fancy Tall Cuff Boot Shoes, Black Gilio, US 6 , Bottega Veneta Boot Glossy Patent Leather Riding Black 7M - Retail $1000 VGCPleaser Usa Womens Shoes & Boots Boots Emma Knee WhiteDr. Martens Women's Size 7 Floral Print Ankle Boots , Womens Winter Cute POM POM Pull On Over Knee Boots Pointy Toe Stiletto US 12Gentleman/Lady EXOTICA-60 Selling special function business , Women's Vintage Black Leather Sendra 2380 Schwarz Harness Riding Biker Boots 7 , Lauren Ralph Lauren shaelynn studded brown bootie boots suede leather $149 7 ,
    Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2 - blurrypron.com>Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2 - blurrypron.com
    Jog Dog Snowdon Waterproof Quilted Sneaker Boot Black/Grey, Womens Various SizesFrye Dorado Green Leather Buckle Riding Boots Women's Shoes Sz 5.5 M NEW RTL$698Rockport Bennett Lane 4 - Venetian Shoes Slip On Loafer MensGentleman/Lady Iron Fist - Unicornopia Platforms High-quality Settlement Price Extreme speed logisticsNaot Women's Reka Mary Jane Flat () BRAND NEW!!!!! , LANVIN CHESTNUT SUEDE ROUND-TOE FLATS SIZE 8 , Gentleman/Lady Born - Womens - Cresent High grade Carefully selected materials businessVC Signature Renna High-Heel Red T-Strap Pumps Sz 5.5 US / 35 1/2 EU $255 NWB.Shoes Women's Vera Wang Brown Satin Toe Gathers Made In Italy 1 Bad Scrape Sz 8MPLEASER Sexy Shoes Black & Red Dual Platform 6" Stiletto Pumps High HeelsJIMMY CHOO Gray REPTILE EMBOSSED PLATFORM Sandals Heels 9 M CagedMUK LUKS Women's Jane Suede Moccasin Grey Moccasin Slippers , Mismatched Nike Shox Men Running shoes black size R8.5/8 AS IS , Puma Classic Suede '50th Gold' in Gold 66341-01 Free shipping , Nike Takedown 4 Men's White & Blue Wrestling Shoes men's size 12 US2014 DS Nike Air Tech Challenge II SP French Open US 11 621358-116 WimbledonAir Max Plus NS GPX Men's Sneakers Size 11 Color Black/White , Nike Air Max 95 iD Black White SZ 8.5 ( 818592-993 )New Men's Adidas NMD R1 PK Sashiko Black Sz 10-14 Primeknit Boost BY3013adidas Prophere Shoes Black Men B37467 , adidas Nemeziz Tango 17+360 Agility Men's Indoor Soccer Shoes BY2302 Sz 6.5 NEWRocky TMC Postal Approved Sport Chukka Boots - Choose SZ/color , Nike Size 9.5 IN SEASON TR 4 Berry Training Running Sneakers New Womens ShoesNew Balance Women's 247 Shoes Silver with Off White , Saucony Men's Feel Sneaker, Grey, 11 Medium USSkechers Performance Womens Go Step - Indigo Boating Shoe- Pick SZ/Color. , Nike Air Max Zero SI Womens 881173-001 Black Bone Grey Running Shoes Size 7.5Women Ladies Chain Decor Square Toe Low Chunky Heels Patent Leather Ankle Boots , Womens Vintage Ethnic Tassel Flat Ankle Chelsea Boots Comfy Zipper Shoes Sbox1 , Doc Martens 11821 Black Floral Canvas 8-Eye Classic Boots AirWair Sz 5 US
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Columbia Womens Bugaboot Tres Pink FG BL1237-144 Womens SIZE 9.5 Pink 29888 White Black d2852d2
    Boots
    >
    ;