Never miss an update

Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 603246587764
Dimensions: L 11.8 x W 10.3 x H 4.8 inches EAN: 0603246587764
NumberOfItems: 1 Brand: Bogs
PartNumber: 72053-601-601-7 M US MPN: 72053-601
ProductGroup: Shoes Binding: Apparel
ISBN: Not Applicable Color: Burgundy
Style: Not Applicable Department: womens
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7 M US Weight: 2.75 lbs
Never miss an update

Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711 -

    Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711
    Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711
    Women Leather Mid Calf Boots Black Heels Fashion Buckle Decor Striped Shoes NEW , Women Pointed Toe Over the Knee Boots Waist High Winter Long Boots Slip On Chic , New! Stuart Weitzman Sidetrack Suede Black Wedge Ankle Boots US 7.5Free People Las Palmas Ankle Boot Size 9 New MSRP: $168Hush Puppies Motivee Mid Calf Block Heel Boots, Dark Brown, 8 US / 39 EUEl Naturalista Womens Ng11 Alhambra Chukka Boot /- Pick SZ/Color. , Naughty Monkey Womens Vamp Phyer Ankle Bootie- Select SZ/Color. , NEW Katy Perry The Patti Pierced Ring Leather Combat Boots Sz 6.5Mr/Ms fly london black boots 41 bargain Wholesale trade Elegant and stable packagingCorso Como Brown Leather Riding Boot Size 6.5Via Spiga Basil Leather Ankle Boot Size 6.5Cole Haan black leather tall heel boots with NikeAir technology - Size 8B , Jean Michel Cazabat "Sharna" Black Suede Slouch Boots sz 8 Euro 38J Crew Parker Vachetta Leather Knee High Boots style 03010 NEW $358DV by Dolce Vita Riding Boot Size 8.5 , Seychelles Womens Chrysalis Black Thigh-High Boots 7.5 Medium (B,M) BHFO 4595Men's/Women's SWING-815 durable Affordable Good qualityGentlemen/Ladies naturalizer Nikole Wedge Booties, Black quality Make full use of materials best seller , Durango Ladies Patriotic Square Toe Flag Western Boots DRD0191 , FREE PEOPLE FARYLROBIN Green Olive Suede Chelsea Ruffle Top Ankle Boots Sz 7Womens Tecnica Moon Boot W.E Low Nylon Ankle Winter Waterproof Boots US 5.5-10 , Steve Madden Dianna Calf Hair Ankle Boot Size 6.5 , Womens Suede Platform Stiletto Heels Over Knee Boots Pointy ToeBack Zipper 2018Maison Martin Margiela Black & Shearling Suede Peep Toe Ankle Booties SZ 37.5 , Vince Camuto Kantha Over The Knee Boots, FoxyFry motorcycle boots for women size 8M color brown , Nine West Women's Leslie Suede Dress Sandal - Choose SZ/color , Aquatalia Faylynn Weatherproof Suede Bootie Black, Womens Various SizesSTEVEN by Steve Madden Women's Nc-Palm Ankle Bootie - Choose SZ/Color
    Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711 ->Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711 -
    Circus by Sam Edelman Women's Lyndsey Fashion Boot , Genuine Leather Embellished Rhinestone Crystal Covered Knee High Boots Shoes C23Sopeia 2221-1806-1 Black Leather Low Heel Knee High Boots Size 38 (US 7.5) , Harley-Davidson Women's GLASSFORD Work Boot Black 8 M US , MEPHISTO Women's AIRJET Modern Loafer Slipper Wedge Slip On Shoes Flats 9.5 (I7) , Stuart Weitzman Black Patent Leather Moccasin Flats Loafer w/ Tassels Shoe 8.5 M , Stella McCartney Black Faux Leather "Elyse" Platform Oxfords SZ 40Gentleman/Lady KISS-209MMET Excellent value Fast delivery Different goodsMan's/Woman's Jessica Simpson Stiletto Heels We have won praise from our customers. Moderate cost Acknowledgement feedback , Jimmy Choo Silver Tone Glitter Slingback Peep Toe Stilettos Size 39.5/9.5 , Spenco Yumi Snake - Supportive Sandals Rose - 8 , Report Women's Landry Flat Sandal Tan 9 M US , Vans Ward Women’s Size 6 Black White Canvas Casual Sneakers Shoes F3-144PUMA Yellow Woven Leather Solange Classic Sneakers Shoes - size 8 RARENIKE SB BLAZER LOW GRANT TAYLOR BLACK / TURF ORANGE-ANTHRACIT-WHITE , Under Armour Drive 4 Men's Basketball Shoes (Size 11) Black 1298309-001Adidas Originals Superstar White & Black Men's Sneakers AQ8333 SZ 7.5 NIB RARE , Vans Old Skool Black White Checkerboard Tan Beige VN0A38G1P0S Off The Wall , Brand New Men's Nike Roshe NM FlyKnit Blk-Wht/Orange Volt Size 10.5 677243 018ASICS Men's Gel-FujiEndurance Trail Runner, Black/Safety Yellow/Vermilion, 6....Vintage NOS Nike Driving Force Never Worn Sneakers Shoes 13 Rare 1989 , Danner Men's Quarry USA 8-in BR Work Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Skechers Men's Сanvas Memory Foam Relaxed Fit Slip-On Loafer/Shoes,12 DM US , Allen Edmonds Grayson Apron Toe Leather Loafers - USA Burgundy Men's 8.5 D , Geox Women's Jaysen Glitter Detail Trainers - Dark Grey and BlackSkechers Performance Women's Go Walk 4 Excite Walking Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , NEW Women's Nike Air Max 90 Shoes Sneakers Size: 5.5 Color: Blue , Womens North Face Ultra Fastpack 2 GTX Black Subtle Green Trainers Shu SizeCOLE HAAN Womens 9.5 B Black Suede Leather High Heel Boots Full Zip , $275 Luxury Rebel Sumaya Women Suede Boots BLK 40/10 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Bogs Women's Amanda ON Slip ON Solid Rain Boot, Burgundy, Amanda Bogs 7 M US cf5f711