Never miss an update

Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65




Item specifics

Condition: New without tags :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item that is not in original retail packaging or may be missing original retail packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Display shoe. , minor wear on soles.The images shown are of the actual shoes for sale.
Brand: Superga Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.)
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7.5 Pattern: Solid
Colour: Black Width: Medium (B, M)
MPN: 2750 Velvetw Style: Fashion Sneakers
Material: Suede UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65 - blurrypron.com

    Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65
    Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65
    Skechers Womens Gratis-Chic Craze Slip on Trainers, Beige Natural, 5 EU , Asics Womens Gel-Lyte V Low-Top Sneakers, Brown MarzipanDark Blue 0549, 8.5 , Brooks Defyance 10 - Women's Running Shoes (B width) , Castaer Womens Chiara C8edss18002 Espadrilles, Red Frambuesa 810, 6.5 , Puma Womens Suede Platform Perf Trainers, Grey Gray Violet-Silver 01, 4.5 UKSuperga Womens 2790 ACOTW Linea Up and Down Trainers, Beige Taupe, 5 EUESPRIT Womens Barbie Lu Low-Top Sneakers, Black Black 001, 5 UK , Tamaris Womens 23631 Low-Top Sneakers, White WhiteRose Met, 3.5 UK , Adidas Women's Stan Smith Originals Casual Shoe , Women's Shoes Sun68 Thin Glitter Gold Sneaker Spring Summer 2018 , Nike Women's Air Max Motion Lw Running ShoeHummel Sl. Stadil Herringbone Low, Womens Low-Top Sneakers, Pink Rose Dawn, 5 , Skechers Womens Gratis-Chic Craze Slip on Trainers, Beige Natural, 3 EUAdidas Women's Response Boost 2 Techfit W Running ShoeSkechers Womens Burst-Hats Off Low-Top Sneakers, Blue Nvaq, 3 EUKenneth Cole New York Kam Fashion Sneakers, Black, 6 USs.Oliver Womens 25201 Low-Top Sneakers, Pink Rose Metallic, 6.5 UKNike Women's Flex Supreme Tr 5 Training ShoeNike Women's Air Max 90 Ez Running Shoe , Elie Tahari Vesuvio Mesh Fashion Sneakers, Black, 6 US / 36 EU , Man's/Woman's New Balance Women's 1296 Tennis Shoe We have won praise from our customers. Quality and quantity guaranteed Don't worry when shoppingThink Womens ANNI282059 Hi-Top Trainers, Grey StahlKombi 19, 66.5 UKSelected Femme Womens Slfdina Leather Trainer B Low-Top Sneakers, MulticolourRebecca Minkoff Stacey Studded Fashion Snakers, Burgundy, 7 US , ADIDAS ORIGINALS NMD_R2 WOMENS - SIZE US 7/ BLACK/INDIGO/WHITEBlackstone PL70, Womens Hi-Top Trainers, Black Black, 3.5 EU , Superga 2790 ACOTW Linea up and, Womens Low-Top Sneakers, Grau Taupe, 8Man's/Woman's Women's INOV8 Roadclaw 275 Size 8 New market Modern design Current shape , NEW Asics GT-2000 Women's Running Shoes from The Village Sport
    Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65 - blurrypron.com>Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65 - blurrypron.com
    Naturalizer Jump Women Brown Ankle Boot Banana Bread US 7.5NEW Dolce Vita Women's Jorden Over The Knee Black Suede Boots Size US 8 M New , Leather Vintage Womens Ankle Boot Buckle Side Zip Roma Gladiator Platform Shoes , Adidas Alphabounce Lux W [BW1217] Women Running Shoes Grey/White-Black , Men's/Women's Ladies Gabor Boots Style 51.722-W Ideal gift for all occasions Bright colors Excellent stretchingJEFFREY CAMPBELL Famous 6.5 US Black Leather Platform Boots Heels 4 UK Nasty Gal , Badgley Mischka Maria Bejeweled Front Peep Toe Sandals 881, Ivory, 9 USTory Burch Women's Sz 8 Pink and Beige Leather gold Logo Ballet FlatsSlowwalk Made in Spain Leather comfort walking shoesMelissa Vivienne Westwood bronze gladiator flats shoes US8-9 EU39-40Burnetie Women's Mid Light Light Blue Canvas Shoes , Man's/Woman's Pleaser FLAMINGO-808SD Quality queen Skilled manufacturing Valuable boutique , Sergio Rossi Virginia Black Patent Leather Heels Platform Pumps Size , Naot Womens Shoes Size 42 12 Beige Metallic Leather Flat Sandals CasualMYSTIQUE TORTOISE SHELL GOLD CRYSTAL JEWELED BROWN LEATHER THONG FLAT SANDALS 8New FILA Original Fitness Logo Shoes Athletic Running Men's White Rubb Sneakers , PUMA 36140301 Mens Yarra Classic Walking Shoe- Choose SZ/Color.Under Armour UA SpeedForm Gemini 3 GR Graphic White/Black Running 1298535-101 , SAVE $$$ Asics Gel GT 2000 6 Mens Running Shoes (D) (9001)Nike x Off White Virgil Abloh The Ten Air Max 90 Size 11NEW WOMENS REEBOK ALL TERRAIN FREEDOM RUNNING SNEAKERS SHOES ORANGE 10 BD4513adidas EQT SUPPORT RF - Black - WomensSkechers Women's Ladies Microburst - ONE UP - Ballet Flat Casual Shoe BlackSaucony Grid Shadow Genesis Women's Shoes Size 5.5 , adidas Originals Tubular Shadow Women's Clear Brown/Ash Green/Off White CQ2463 , ASICS T6L5N.9690 Womens Gel-KahanaTrail Runner- Choose SZ/Color. , ERIC MICHAEL BLACK SUEDE MINDY ANKLE BOOT W FULL ZIP , BORN ERIE WOMENS MID-CALF BOOTS BLACK DISTRESSED SUEDE LEATHER 9 M , Casual Street Women Stretchy Shoes Pointy Toe Pull On Boots Chunky Heel Solid sz , Jeffrey Campbell Fosse Womens Black Platform Boot Size 7.5
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Superga 254, 2750 Velvetw Low 38 Top Sneakers 29504 254, Black, 7.5 US/ 38 EU 370bd65
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;