Never miss an update

Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Authenticity: 100% Authentic Guaranteed
MPN: 918226004 Return Address: Domestic Return For U.s. Customers
Style: Athletic Sneakers US Shoe Size (Baby & Toddler): Us 2c ~ 10c
Width: Medium (d, M) US Shoe Size (Youth): Us 10c ~ Us 7y
Material: Synthetic US Shoe Size (Women's): Us 5 ~ Us 12
Color: Gray US Shoe Size (Men's): Us 7 ~ Us 14
Country/Region of Manufacture: China Brand: Nike
Never miss an update

Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14 - blurrypron.com

    Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14
    Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14
    NIKE FLYKNIT FREE 5.0 Mens Size US 11.5 45.5 Volt/White-Electric Green-Wolf GreyMens Nike Air Max Premium 875844-003 Pure Platinum Black Brand New Size 10New Balance 572 Elite Green/Grey Halloween Pack MRT572GG Men's SZ 10Nike Air Max 2013 Running Shoe SZ 15 Sunset Pack 579954-807 Orange Yellow $180Nike Free RN Motion FK 2017 880845-100 Size 12.5 , Nike Air Presto Ultra Se 908020-404 BLUE WHITE RUNNING SHOES MENS SIZE 9NIKE AIR MAX 1 PREMIUM SC JEWEL RED SUEDE MEN'S SZ 12.5 NEW 918354-600 NOLIDUnder Armour Clutchfit Drive Low Basketball Sneakers Red Black White Size 12.5New Nike Kobe 11 Alt Tumbled Grey Metallic Gold Size 10.5 (880463-079) , NIKE Men's Roshe Nm Tp Black/Black-Black Ankle-High Walking Shoe - 9M , NIKE Air Zoom Attack Men's Golf Shoes 853739-002 Black/Gray Sz 10 W **New** , Lyle & Scott Men Speedie Eagle Textile Suede Fashion Trainers Casual Shoes BlackADIDAS NMD RACER PK SZ 10.5 CORE BLACK GREY CLOUD WHITE PRIMEKNIT AQ0949 , Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 Essential Cobblestone/Solar Red Multi Size 875695-010 , New Balance M1340SB2 Athletic Shoes - Men's Size 10.5D - Multicolor , Asics Colorado Eigthy-Five RB Light Grey/Light Grey D604N 1313 Men's SZ 8 , SAVE $$$ Mizuno Wave Equate 2 Mens Running Shoes (D) (01) , NIKE AIR MORE UPTEMPO '96 PRM AA4060-200 FLAX PHANTOM SIZE: 11Merrell J35965-11-D Men's Black Slate Hiking Boot, 11D M US Size , Air Jordan 6IX Rings Six 6 Retro Silver Cool Grey 322992-014 9.5 vi vii viii xiReebok Cloudride DMX 3.0 [CN0800] Men Walking Shoes Alloy/Grey , New Balance Men's Fresh Foam Vongo v2 Shoes Blue with BlackNew Balance U520CL D [U520CLD] Men Casual Shoes Grey/Navy , Vans Mens Old Skool Lite LX Horween Lapis Blue VN-0A3DPYONEAdidas Men's Nmd_R1 Stlt Primeknit Originals Trace Olive/Core Black/Solar Lime2005 Air Max 90 leather black /net-desert clay 311036 011 mens US 9.5 /adidas Alphabounce EM M Black Grey Men Running Shoes Sneakers BY4263 , Mens Nike Lebron Solder XI SFG 897646-700 Wheat Gold Brand New Size 13Mens Nike Shox Gravity AQ8553-009 Vast Grey Brand New Size 8.5 ,
    Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14 - blurrypron.com>Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14 - blurrypron.com
    New Rock M.591X-S1 Black Womens - Mens Boots , new STEVEN STEVE MADDEN 'Sady' black leather full zipper TALL FLAT BOOTS 6 - hotRARE DEVI KROELL Black Python THIGH HIGH Flat BOOT Size 39 , USG United Sportproducts Germany Women's 23345 Horse Riding Boots Black 45Lotto Megalight W T4040 Womens Shoes Pearl Rose Nylon Running Sneakers CasualMen/Women Florance Florance Sandal (Taupe) Durable service New products in 2018 comfortableNew ECCO BROWN LEATHER CAP TOE MARY JANE Clogs - 9.5 - 10 - 40 EU MED , Clarks Black Embossed Leather Patty Tanya Slip on Mule Clogs 8.5 Sale , Fashion Women Sandals High Heel Ankle Strap Shoes Stilettos Clubwear Sexy Buckle , Womens Sexy Peep Toe Ankle Strap High Heel Party Sandals Rivets Stiletto Heelsbadgley mischka shoes 5.5, Black Brand New , Kurt Geiger Platform Sandals Size 6 AU/ EU37Steve Madden Women's Irenee Heeled Dress Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , Men's/Women's jimmy choo shoes size 39 New market buy Sales online store , Nine West 25026947 Womens Cerys Suede Pump- Choose SZ/Color. , NEW LADIES BALLROOM DANCE SHOES TANGO SALSA LATIN 100% Argentine leather US Sz 7 , Sbicca Womens Exist Fisherman Sandal- Pick SZ/Color. , NEW Giuseppe Zanotti Sandals 37.5 Black Leather Silver Crystal Flats Flip Flops , NIKE Zoom All Out 2 Running Shoes Size 11 retail $140Mens 8.5 M El Malcreado Mexico brown ostrich skin cowboy western boots handmadeMen's Suede Chelsea Ankle Boots Flat Pointy Toe Pull On Casual High Top Shoes , Jimmy Choo Men's Shoes. $1195. 44,US 11 , Rockport Men's Dressports Luxe Bike Toe Slip On Oxford - Choose SZ/ColorWOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA PLATFORM STRAP SATIN EP [366009 01]Nike Women's Air Zoom Structure 21 Running Armoury Blue 904701-400 Sz 11 NIB , adidas Performance AQ1993 Womens Ively Cross-Trainer Shoe- Choose SZ/Color. , Converse One Star Golf Le Fleur Tyler The Creator Plume Blue Pink Unisex 162127C , New Heavenly Feet Carrie Shoes Sizes 7 Wedge Heel Rubber Sole , G By Guess Hertlez Womens Brown Faux Leather Fashion Knee-High Boots Size 5MW USAudrey Brooke AB Kiley Leather Shoe Boots $120 8 Quality Comfortable Nice sexy ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nike Lab Air Zoom LWP 16 29894 Kim Jones Kim Grey Grey White Men Shoes Sneakers 918226-004 2f3bc14
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;