Never miss an update

ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
EAN: Does not apply
Color: Black MPN: Shape 75 Chelsea Boot
Size: 39 EU/8-8.5 M US Brand: ECCO
Style: Black UPC: Does not apply
US Shoe Size (Women's): 39 EU/8-8.5 M US
Never miss an update

ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c - blurrypron.com

    ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c
    ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c
    Hush Puppies Women's Cyra Catelyn Ankle Bootie , Dolce Vita Women's Jimmy Over The Knee Boot - Choose SZ/Color , LifeStride Women's Sikora Riding Boot Dark Brown 8 W USAnnie Shoes Women's Mobile Wide Calf Riding Boot Black/Leopard 8 W USCar Shoe By Prada Brown Web Stitched Suede Sneakers Sz 36/6~RTL$795 , Nine West 25021821 Womens Laulani Suede Boot, Natural, 10 M USBed Stu Women's Manchester Teak Glaze Boot 9.5M , CLARKS Women's Maypearl Oasis Engineer Boot Black 6 M US , Baffin Women's Snogoose Winter Boot Charcoal 8 M US , Marc Fisher Women's Wrangler Mule - Choose SZ/Color , PUMA Safety Womens Velocity White SD 7 M USALDO Women's Fearien Boot Black Leather 8 B(M) US , Splendid Women's Ravi Ankle Boot Black 8 M USBareTraps Women's Bt Lancy Snow Boot Black 8 M US , Skechers Women's On-The-go City 2-14620 Winter Boot - Choose SZ/ColorDune London Women's Pollo Western Boot Taupe 8 M US , NEW TWO LIPS brown black silver LEATHER Boots Merlot 6.5 M GORGEOUS $159 , Kelsi Dagger Brooklyn Women's Thea Wedge Bootie Taupe 8 M US , Anne Klein Women's Elek Suede Winter Boot Black 7 M US , Roper 09-021-1778-0127 Womens Bailey Loafer Flat 7 D US- Choose SZ/Color. , Remonte D1784 Boot - NIB - Free ShippingFerrini Women's Print Alligator S-Toe Western Boot,Chocolate,8 B US , Call It Spring Women's Pilasien Snow Boot Black Synthetic 8 M USReport Women's Aileen Ankle Boot Black 8 M USSam Edelman F0299L1 Womens Garner- Choose SZ/Color. , Pleaser DEL1016/B/M Womens Del1016/B/M Boot- Choose SZ/Color.Steve Madden PIPER-005 Womens Piper Pump- Choose SZ/Color. , *** Pleaser Delight-600-36 silver peep toe stiletto platform rhinestone boots 12 , Corso Como Women's Kandace Motorcycle Boot Tobacco Tumbled Leather 8 B(M) US
    ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c - blurrypron.com>ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c - blurrypron.com
    Gentlemen/Ladies Tahari Womens Johnny Reputation first Fast delivery VariousGabor Women's 71.801 Black 5.5 B UK , Eastland Women's Dakota Winter Boot, Peanut, Size 9.0 US / 7 UKHGL Women 4-10 2308 Trainers Black Size 3.5 UK , Stuart Weitzman Accent T-Strap Dress Sandals 059, Fossil Suede, 9.5 US , Diesel Women's Kalling W Black Dress OxfordNURSE MATES CHELSEA clogs Black Python iridescent reptile Pillowtop Shoe - 11 , Jeffrey Campbell Havana Last Tick Studded Wedge Mega Platform Shoes Sz 7 MWomens Pointed Toe Stilettos High Heel Strap Hollow wedding party Shoes Plus SZKensie Womens Arlo Black Patent Evening Pumps Shoes 7.5 Medium (B,M) BHFO 5804Womens Pointy Toe Kitten Leather Fashion Solid Metal Decor Ankle Strap SandalsNEW WITH BOX - GIANNI BINI CHELLIE COBBLE TAUPE ANKLE BOOTIES size US 9.5Naturalizer Women's Natalie Pump, Pink Suede, 4.5 Medium USsz 37.5 new ROGER VIVIER heels Pumps Paris* 2-tone brown Leather suede , Lisa Hunt/Cat-Running Shoes For Women-3D Print-Free ShippingNew Balance Womens Black Cross Training Shoes Size 11 (40865) , Stuart Weitzman Black Studded Leather Strappy Sandal Size 7.5M B1663Man's/Woman's Nike air maxTL Special purchase Orders are welcome renewed on time , K-Swiss 05643-141-M Mens Pershing Court CMF Sneaker- Choose SZ/Color.Red Wing 8174 Suede Work Boots Black Size 5.5 , Belgian Dress Shoe Men Leather Slip on Flat Bowtie Business Casual Loafer Shoes , ALDO Men's Ibaliwen-r Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , Clear Weather NEW IN BOX The One-O-One Leather MENS SNEAKER BEIGEADIDAS MEN SUPERSTAR FOUNDATION SNEAKER SHOES - S79208VANGELO/TUX-5 Wrinkle Free Mens Dress Shoes Bicycle Toe Iron Grey Sz 9.5MSALE CLARKS MENS ACRE OUT -BLACK LEATHER - SLIP ON SHOESadidas swift run womens Originals Size 7 Blue NWTSalomon Women's Sense Pro Max 392488 Trail Running Shoe Size 7.5 Grape/WhiteUnder Armour 1285496-076-11 Womens Speedform Velociti Running-ShoesVery Volatile Sloane Wedges-Women's size 8 Tan ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    ECCO Chelsea Women's Shape 75 Chelsea Boot Black 39 Boot EU 75/8-8.5 M US dc78f2c
    Boots
    >
    ;