Never miss an update

Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Stylenumber: 942855-006
Style: Running, Cross Training Color: Gridiron/Lt Carbon/Storm Pink/Atmosphere Grey
Width: Medium (B, M) Brand: Nike
US Shoe Size (Women's): 5 Gender: Womens
UPC: 888408400154
Never miss an update

Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c - blurrypron.com

    Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c
    Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c
    NIKE Womens Air Max Torch 4 343851-005 COOL GREY Size 6 , Nike Air Max Thea Womens Style : 861674 Metallic Silver Womens Size 5Saucony Women's Zealot Iso 2-w Running Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorDrew Shoe Women's Flame Mary Janes Sneakers,White,8.5 N , NIKE Womens Air Max Torch 4 343851-005 COOL GREY Size 8NIKE Womens Nike Free Tr 7 904651-001 BLACK/WHITE Womens Size 10PUMA Women's Ignite Evoknit WN's Cross-Trainer Shoe Peacoat-Sparkling Co 11 M US , ASICS Women's GT-2000 4 Lite-Show PG Track ShoeNIKE Womens Air Max Torch 4 343851-005 COOL GREY Size 7 , NIKE Womens Nike Free Tr 8 942888-001 BLACK/WHITE Womens Size 9.5 , Nike Air Max 90 Laser Pink Womens 325213-136 White Purple Grey Shoes Size 6 , Nike Metcon 3 Womens 849807-001 Black White Mesh Cross Training Shoes Size 6Adidas Performance Women's Mana Bounce 2 W Aramis Running ShoeNike Air Zoom Fearless Flyknit Womens 850426-101 Melon Running Shoes Size 9.5Altra Women's Provision 2.5 Running Shoe, Orchid/Black, 5.5 M USNike Air Max 90 Womens 325213-055 Black White Gum Brown Running Shoes Size 10 , Nike Air Max 90 Womens 325213-055 Black White Gum Brown Running Shoes Size 6.5 , Nike Air Max 90 Womens 325213-055 Black White Gum Brown Running Shoes Size 11Saucony Women's Excursion Tr11 GTX Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , Nike Air Huarache Run Prm Txt Womens Style : Aa0523 Mahogany Size 5.5Balance Women's SD200V1 Track Spike, Black/Orange, 7 B USNike Air Max 90 Womens 325213-055 Black White Gum Brown Running Shoes Size 7.5Nike Air Max Sequent 2 Womens Style : 852465 Cool Grey Size 6.5Adidas Originals Superstar - Women's 85139 WHITE Womens Size 6 , Adidas Superstar Metal Toe Womens Style : Bb5115 Black Size 7.5 , NIKE Womens Nike Free Tr 7 904651-001 BLACK/WHITE Womens Size 11Nike Air Zoom Mariah Flyknit Racer Womens AA0521-300 MultiColor Shoes Size 6Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 9Twinkle Toes by Skechers Golf Women's Go Pro Shoe
    Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c - blurrypron.com>Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c - blurrypron.com
    See By Chloe Size 37 Womens Leather Brown Color Block Heels Ankle Booties ZipGameday North Carolina State University Cowgirl Boot - Pointed Toe - NCS L052-1 , ADIDAS MATCHCOURT HIGH RX2 WHITE/WHITE/GOLD FREE POSTAGE AUSTRALIAN SELLERNew Balance WL515IFC B Suede Grey White Women Running Shoes Sneakers WL515IFCBGentleman/Lady Adidas zx 500 Og Us12.5 Every item described is available Bright colors Caramel, gentleECCO Women's Felicia Stretch Wedge Loafers Black/White Size /US 6.0-6.5MLa Plume Beth leather Mule with Pearl Blue Finish on 2 1/4 inch wedge Euro 39Salvatore Ferragamo Women's Patty C Pink 100% Leather Ballet Flats ShoesEllie 415-Flamingo 4.5 inch platform open toe evening party sequin glitter pumps , RARE Womens Birkenstock ''Luxor'' Purple Mauve Leather Braided Thong Slides Sz 9 , MANOLO BLAHNIK Python Snake Heels Sz 38 $1900 , F-763190 New Valentino Rockstud Camouflage Neon Green Pump Marked 40 US 10 , Tory Burch Marguerite 2 Flip Flop Size 9 Perfect Navy PVC Brand New With Box , Men's/Women's New Balance Women's Wlrushv1 Sneaker Attractive and durable product quality Shopping promotion , Man/Woman Skechers Women's Go Walk Lite-15375 Sneaker Quality queen the most economical A balance between toughness and hardness , Nike Air Max LTD 3 Black/Dark Grey-White 9.5M NIB 687977 011NEW adidas Prophere CQ3022 Mens Shoes Trainers Sneakers SALE2012 Supreme Comme des Garcons Vans Sk8 Hi Pro Sz 9Jordan Trainer 3 Mens AJ7982-001 Black White Athletic Training Shoes Size 13Air Jordan 1 Retro HI OG Gatorade Mens AJ5997-455 Blue Lagoon Shoes Size 10.5New Men's Air Jordan 1 Retro High Anti Gravity Sz 9 Deep Royal White 332550-420DANNER HIGH GROUND SIZE 8.5 HUNTING BOOTS 400g MOSSY OAK 46226Specchio Men's Black Oxford Shoes Size 11 USABX205 J. BREITLIN shoes black leather men elegantPAUL GREEN Cage Suede and Leather Sneakers Side Zip Shoe Black $317 sz 7.5 US 10 , BT452 SUPERGA shoes pink textile women sneakers , Gentlemen/Ladies Drew Women's Alicia Crazy price Has a long reputation Excellent workmanshipNike Air Foamposite One Dark Stucco/Black Women's Basketball Shoes AA3963-001 , Frye Womens - Melissa Seam Tall Wide Calf - Cognac - 6M -NIB - BIN for Free Ship , Earth Hydra Slingback Booties - Women's Size 9.5 B, Black ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nike 29952 Air Zoom Shoes Pegasus 35 Nike Womens 942855-006 Gridiron Pink Running Shoes Size 5 7c7881c
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;