Never miss an update

Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 696391750053
Weight: 5.3 lbs EAN: 0696391750053
Dimensions: L 20.51 x W 12.01 x H 4.8 inches Brand: Naturalizer
PartNumber: F1615L1-250 MPN: F1615L1
ProductGroup: Shoes Binding: Apparel
ISBN: Not Applicable Color: Oatmeal
Style: Not Applicable Department: womens
US Shoe Size (Women's): 10 M US
Never miss an update

Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7 -

    Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7
    Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7
    Man's/Woman's FLY London Women's Arizona Western Boot Aesthetic appearance luxurious Direct businessVery Volatile Women's Script Ankle Bootie, Tan, 7 B USDolce Vita Women's Gwyn Ankle Bootie, Bone Suede, 8.5 M USMen/Women Donald Pliner Priscila Leather Boot, 8.5 Long-term reputation Pleasant appearance King of the crowdNine West Women's Varee Leather Riding BootRocky Men's TMC 4" Postal-Approved Non-Metallic Duty Chukka Boots-FQ0005000Gentleman/Lady Oboz Pika Hiking Shoe - Women's Economical and practical new renewed on time , Eastland Women's up Country 1955 Chukka Boot, Tan, 8 M USNEW MM6 MAISON MARGIELA WOMENS ANKLE BOOTMerrell Women's Sylva Tall Waterproof Winter Boot, Merrell Tan, 7 M US , Men/Women Roper Women's Dusty Western Boot High security Highly praised and appreciated by the consumer audience Quality and consumer firstGentleman/Lady Steve Madden Women's Vanity Ankle Bootie quality Stylish and charming Famous store , FRYE Women's Veronica Belted Short-STO Engineer Boot, Black, 5.5 M US , Man/Woman Chinese Laundry Women's Sharp Boot Every item described is available Used in durability leading the fashionTeva Women's W DE LA Vina Dos Chelsea Boot, Pecan, 8.5 M US , Gentlemen/Ladies Ariat Women's Shasta H2o Work Boot Beautiful color First quality professional design , Man's/Woman's Anne Klein Women's Lyvia Boot Strong heat and wear resistance Used in durability Elegant and solemn , Twisted X Women's Leather Slip-On Rubber Sole Moc Toe Driving Moccasins - Bomber , Donald J Pliner Patsy Crepe Elastic Knee High Boots in Black Size 8.5 , Aerosoles Women's Mythology Boot, Dark tan Leather, 8 M USMatisse Women's EL Paso Slouch Boot, Tan, 8.5 M US , Aerosoles Women's Third Ave Boot, Dark Tan Leather, 8.5 M US , Dingo Women's Dusty Biege Leather 9 B USMan/Woman Pajar Women's Kady Boot Strong heat and wear resistance the most economical Human borderGentlemen/Ladies Cole Haan Women's OG Motogrand Bootie Aesthetic appearance The highest quality material Clearance saleSteve Madden Women's Kimmi Harness Boot, Black, 8.5 M USGentleman/Lady Nine West Women's Lina Suede Boot elegant the most economical Fine wildBCBG Generation Women's Helen Bootie Ankle Boot, Black Patent, 7.5 M US , Black Mail Women's Chicago Boot, Black, 39 M EU/9 M US
    Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7 ->Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7 -
    Man/Woman HUNTER Shoes 160145 Black 4 New market Fine art Shopping promotion , Gentlemen/Ladies ZARA High Heeled Leather Boots Many styles Make full use of materials Quality and consumer first , Maison Margiela Shoes 546451 Beige 38 , $2,199 IVONNE Italian Designer Black Leather Platform Ankle Boots Open Toes 38Cole Haan Oak Bootie Womens Boot- Choose SZ/Color. , NIKE MENS KYRIE LOW WHITE BLACK GUM BASKETBALL SHOES 2018 **BEST SELLERNEW Spring Court G2S S023 - Suede / Womens , Brand New, Women's Nike Flex 2915 RN Blue And White Size 8.5 US , FRENCH CONNECTION UK PERFORATED LEATHER SNEAKER SIZE 40 , Ladies Clarks Mary Jane Buckled Leather Court Shoes Denny Date , Marc Fisher Amber Wide Calf Riding Boots 539, Dark Brown, 5 US , Crocs Sanrah Hammered Met Wedge Flip Black Black , Man/Woman Ladies HB Shoes 502-W Great variety Online export store Official websiteStuart Weitzman Dreamy Silver Croco Specchio Fashion Sneaker Size 7.5M RH10584*ALDO Galelawen - Women High Heel Shoes Size 8.5 Black Synthetic$995 New Charlotte Olympia DOLLY Calf Hair Leopard Print Platform Pumps Shoes 41 , **Jack Rogers Daphne Flat Sandal-Women's Size 8M Rose GoldWomens Fashion Slippers Princetown Slip on Plaid Backless Loafer Shoes Mules SZAuthentic Bottega Veneta GREY (LIGHT TITANIUM) Leather Flat Sandals size 39Men's Nike Footscape Desert Chukka Barkroot Brown Hyper Jade Ash Grey 652822-201Nike PG 1 Volt/Black/White Men's Basketball Shoes Size 11 , Nike Air Huarache Run Ultra SE Black/Black-White Men's Running Shoes 875841-004 , PUMA EVOSPEED STARIGNITE-M Mens Evospeed StarIgnite Soccer Shoe , Nike SF Air Force 1 Mid Mens 917753-005 Black Leather Nylon Shoes Size 12 , New JD Fisk Men's Gaza Wingtip Oxford - sz 9.5 M (NWB) , Sam Edelman Women's Yaro Ankle Strap Sandal Black Embossed Floral FabricNew Nike Women's Air Max 97 Ultra '17 SE Shoes (AH6806-101) White/Blue-B Volt , Women Knee High Boots embroider Stilettos Elegant Pointy toe Shoes Zipper BootGentlemen/Ladies Mihcaels kors sabrina bootie size 7M online sale Quality First International big name , Steve Madden Womens Balen Suede Almond Toe Knee High Fashion, TAUPE, Size 6.5
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Naturalizer Women's Demi US Riding Oatmeal, Boot, Oatmeal, 10 10 M US 3bac0e7