Never miss an update

Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Excellent condition just once
Brand: Burberry Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy
Style: Strappy Country of Manufacture: Italy
US Shoe Size (Women's): 10 Heel Type: Kitten
Heel Height: High (3 in. to 4.5 in.) Color: black
Material: Patent Leather UPC: Does Not Apply
Never miss an update

Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494 - blurrypron.com

    Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494
    Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494
    NIB $695 Emporio Armani Women’s Sandal Shoes Red/Burgundy 9 US ( 39 Eu ) X3G130 , ISABEL MARANT Black Suede And Wood Wedge Shoes, US 8 , Prada Platform Shoes Yellow Patent Striped Wood Heal And Platform New Size 37EMILIO PUCCI Silk Scarf Satin Kitten Heels 8Gabor 85.663.62 Metallic Effect Silver Gold Pointed Toe Sandal Shoe 9 New , Jimmy Choo Brown/Gold Satin Sandals With Sequin Detail SZ 38 Sale , Yves Saint Laurent Black Suede Square ToeRENE CAOVILLA VENEZIA crystal heels woman's shoes sandals 40/10 black , NWOB Alice & Olivia Rachelle Orange Pumps US 6 / 36 NEW!LANVIN Sandals Ete 2011 Black Heels Stilettos Heels , Gabor 85.663.62 Metallic Effect Silver Gold Pointed Toe Sandal Shoe 7 New , 2A7 Proenza Schouler Suede Clogs Peep Toe Sandals Women Shoes Sz 5.5 (36) $705 , Loeffler Randall Mabel Platform Very Strappy Open Toe Booties 9 - $695 , New TORY BURCH Cream Woven Leather Sandal Wedge Heel size 7.5 , NEW $700 DOLCE & GABBANA Leopard Print Leather Hair Pumps Heels Shoes EU35/US4.5NEW $720 DOLCE & GABBANA Blue Suede Leather Booties Shoes Pumps s. EU41 / US9.5 , Prada Shoe Brown Leather Pump Size 39. 1/2 , NEW $720 DOLCE & GABBANA Yellow Silk Brocade Platform Pumps Shoes EU41 / US10.5EUC Giuseppe Zanotti Metallic Gray Bootie Boot Heels Bow Pointed Toe Size 36.5 , Man's/Woman's Lanvin Sling Back Size 38.5 The color is very eye-catching Elegant and sturdy packaging General product , United Nude Womens Fold Hi Dress Pump /7.5-- Pick SZ/Color. , Men/Women Tory Burch Caroline Pumps 7.5 Special purchase Beautiful appearance Cheap order , Vivienne Westwood Anglomania + Melissa Slave Sandal Limited Edition US 5 8 10NEW Tory Burch 'Lowell' Leather Pump Logo Toe - Red / Gold - 9 M (Z17) , Ask Alice Tonight Ankle Strap Pump - Women's Size 6, BlackNEW TORY BURCH $295 Charlene gold brown strappy heels sandals size 8RARE Jill Stuart Black Leather Criss Cross Ankle Strap Wedge Sandals Wood 38 , Jimmy choo Women’s Sandals Dory100 Ice Blue Sandals EU39 , Black ankle strap rhinestone 7" platform stripper shoes
    Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494 - blurrypron.com>Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494 - blurrypron.com
    Red Wing 877 Vintage American Heritage Boots Union Made 10.5us , women's shoes EDDY DANIELE 7 () flats light blue leather swarovski AW461Skechers Sure Track-Trickel Women Size 6.5 Fabric Lining Black Leather Work Shoe , $175 VIA SPIGA TARIN Chocolate Leather Designer Espadrille Wedges Sandals 7 M , Anne Klein Women's Carissa Perforated Sport Wedge Pump - Choose SZ/Color , NEW VINCE CAMUTO WOMENS ROBEKA ANKLE STRAP SANDAL , Circus by SAM EDELMAN Blush Glitter Open Toe Mules Booties Block Heels Shoes 6AEROSOLES GREAT CALL Women SLIDE SANDALS (7.5 M, GREY MULTI)Jessica Simpson Women's Brimah Sandal, - Choose SZ/ColorSkechers Women's Go Walk Joy Soothe Sneaker , $1095 Charlotte Olympia Rose Gold Metallic Octavia 100 Sandal Size 39.5 9.5 9New Nike Free 5.0 TR Fit 5 PRT Womens Pink Black Silver White Sz 9.5 704695-012New! Nike 852461-007 Mens Air Max Sequent 2 Grey/White 10.5D 101Q aa , ADIDAS ORIGINALS SUPERSTAR 2 - G17067 ( US 10) , Nike Air Vibenna Black White Men Running Shoes Sneakers Trainers 866069-001 , NIKE FLYKNIT LUNAR 3 [698181 007] NO AIR VAPOR MAX RACER MARIAH TRAINER SZ 11CESARE PACIOTTI 4US LIMITED EDITION LOW TOP SNEAKERS BLACK Size 10 , Nike Air Jordan 1 AJKO Retro High OG Black/Royal Sz 11.5 w Receipt Canvas Vandal , NEW BALANCE CM576PR 576 997 purple rose concepts 999 kennedy 998 solebox newSkechers Lightweight Performance Men's Go Walk 3 Slip-On Walking Shoe,10 DM USSperry Top-Sider 11759 Men's Boat Moc 2-Eye Shoes Color: BrownUnder Armour Verge 2.0 Low Gore-tex Hiking Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Johnston & Murphy Aristocrat USA Apron Tassel Dress Loafers Men's US 12 A narrowNew Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Women Girl Motteld OX Shoes Trainers 144868Mizuno Wave Horizon Lightweight Running Shoes, Women's - Size 8, Neon Red/BlackMIZUNO WAVE LEGEND 3 WOMENS SIZE 11 RUNNING WORKOUT JOGGING GYM SHOES NEW PINK , Nike W Lunarepic Low Flyknit Running Women's Shoes Size 9.5 , Stylish Rabbit Fir Trim Tassel Pointed Wedge Heels Lady Suede Winter Ankle Boots , Sweet Women Pointy Toe Mesh Mid Block Heel Bowknot Ankle Boot Shoes Fall CasaulEarth Dorset Black Women's Elastic gussets Ankle Boots size 7
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Burberry Prorsum sz shoes 40/ 10 strappy studded studded shoes strappy heels zip back 61b1494
    Heels
    >
    ;