Never miss an update

Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Asics
US Shoe Size (Women's): 10.5 Width: Medium (B, M)
Style: Tennis Color: White/Blue
UPC: 887749665765
Never miss an update

Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86 - blurrypron.com

    Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86
    Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86
    Adidas XCS Women Spikeless Cross Country Running Shoes S76865 Black Pink Size 8Nike Air Jordan 2009 White Red Men's - Size 11 , Women's Altra Footwear Zero Drop Running Shoes Blue Size 12Propet Washable Walker - Women's Casual Or White Leather - 11 X-WideNike Air Zoom Cage 3 HC Tennis Shoes WMNS Gray Orange Quartz SZ 6 -918199-001 , New Balance Womens 996 Mid Retro Sneaker Boot Shoe WH996BXW Japan Rare Size 5.5 , Under Armour Womens Size 11 SpeedForm Velociti Graphic Re Grey Running Shoes , WMNS NIKE AIR ZOOM 90 IT GOLF CLEATS "RORY MCILORY ( 844648 001 ) SIZE 6.5adidas Adizero Adios 3 Running Shoes Women's Size 8.5 Gray Continental SoleWomen's Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Tri Zip High Top, 544859C Size 7 Black/GoSALOMON S-WIND INCA 38-40.5 NEW running ultra speedcross crossmax xa pro , WOMEN'S BROOKS GLYCERIN 15 size 7 I!WORN AROUND 15 MILES! RUNNING SHOES !Adidas Originals Women's Adilette Lilo Slides Size 5 to 10 us CQ2907Womens Nike Air Max 2012 Orchid Pink 487679-114 Running Shoes Sz 8NIKE ROSHE ONE wmn USszs: 7; 8 BLACK Lightweight Running Casual Shoe 511882-094NIB Puma Fenty Pointed Patent Leather Creeper Sz.9Nike free 5.0 (GS) women shoes size 6 Youth running training shoesAdidas x Overkill x Fruition Women's Tubular Elastics Runners S.E. 9 US APEBronx Women's Neon Trees Peach Satin Print Fabric Size 38 MWMNS NIKE CITY LOOP TECH FLEECE OBSIDIAN/BLACK RUNNING ( AA1097 400 ) SIZE 7 , New Nike Womens LF1 Duck-Boot Air Force Shoes Boots AA0283-001 Sz 7.5 BlackNike Women's Free RN Flyknit 2018 Running Sneakers Size 5.5 White/BlackMarc Joseph Grand Central Flat Women’s Sz 5.5 Navy Metallic Scrawl 4799 OfficePantofola d'Oro Multi Color Textile & Leather camo Print Euro Track Sneaker 39Nike Air Max 90 Ultra Essential fitness running shoes 724981 006 size 10, , MUST SEE FABULOUS $179.99 2017 NEW BALANCE 998 W998WA WOMEN 9.5 B EEEUC LNNike Womens Air Zoom Pegasus 34 Running Shoes Size 8.5 Ice Blue 880560 404NIKE Women's Juvenate Sneaker, Palm Green/Legion Green/Black/White, 9 B USadidas Women's Originals Stan Smith - Women's BB5154 Core Pink Size 10 NWT
    Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86 - blurrypron.com>Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86 - blurrypron.com
    *BRAND NEW* Air Jordan X Don C Legacy 312 - WHITE, HOT LAVA, ZEN GREY - US 12 , P448 John Low Top Fashion Sneakers, Multicolor, 5.5 US / 36 EU , CLARKS ORIGINALS PRIDDY WALLA BLACK PINK SUEDE LEATHER WALLABEES LOAFERS SHOES , Men's/Women's burberry sneakers Woman Size 37,5 Leather Clever and practical Online Personalization trend , A2 by Aerosoles Women's SoftBall Slip-On Loafer Shoe Bronze metallic US SIze 7 W , BareTraps Women's Beverly Slide Sandal Grey 10 Medium US , Women's JOSEF SEIBEL 228206 black strappy wedge sandals sz. 41 , aw32 EDDY DANIELE shoes light blue satin swarovski crystals women sandals , HAFLINGER WOMEN'S SASSY CAT DESIGN INDOOR WOOL SLIPPERS Sz.38 , Skechers Sport - Skech Air 2.0 Wentland2016 Nike Hyperdunk 08 Kobe Bryant Olympics Photo Blue 820321-400 Msrp $150 DW , REEBOK VENTILATOR AAPE BY A BATHING APE DUCK CAMO LIMITED EDITIONNew Balance Men's 696v3 Tennis Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorMan/Woman Converse, 102778, ASR B5 High, feature First batch of customers Valuable boutique , Eastland Women's Seneca Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Mauri Italy Men's Camouflage All Alligator Crocodile Military Combat Boots 10.5Skechers 77032 BLK Men's FELTON-ALTAIR Work Shoes , S76489 adidas Mens Soccer Messi 16+ Pureagility Firm Ground Cleats (12)Men's Bally Brown Tassel wing tip Loafers size 9 D , Hoka One One Challenger Atr 2 Women's Blue/Sunny Lime Running Shoe 7.5MNike Benassi Fanny Pack Magenta Hyper Punch AO1037 600 MenSteve Madden Decaf Black Fashion Sneakers Women's Size 6 M* , Adidas Solar Drive ST W [AC8139] Women Running Shoes Real Lilac/InkNike Air Max 90 woven SP london QS ( 41 / 8 us / 7 uk ) 586845 108 , Man's/Woman's Stella Mccartney Eclypse Metallic Sneaker Best-selling worldwide Comfortable touch Great choiceSalomon Men's Sonic Aero Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , Formal Buckles Strap Womens Pointy Toe Pearls Decor Chunky Heels Ankle Boots NewRED WING 1668 Black Leather Motorcycle Zipper Boot Women's Size 7Nine West Christie Knee High Boots 334, Black, 9 USNIB Women's Black Leather UMBERTO RAFFINI Mona Platform Ankle Booties EU40/ US 9 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Asics Size Gel Challenger 10 Vball Tennis Women's Shoes 10.5 Size Vball 10.5 5c73b86
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;