Never miss an update

Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Authenticity: 100% Authentic Guaranteed
MPN: Aj0036200 Return Address: Domestic Return For U.s. Customers
Style: Running, Cross Training US Shoe Size (Baby & Toddler): Us 2c ~ 10c
Width: Medium (b, M) US Shoe Size (Youth): Us 10c ~ Us 7y
Material: Synthetic US Shoe Size (Women's): Us 5 ~ Us 12
Color: Pink US Shoe Size (Men's): Us 7 ~ Us 14
Country/Region of Manufacture: Vietnam Brand: Nike
Never miss an update

Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9 -

    Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9
    Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9
    WOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA VIKKY PLATFORM [363287 05]Ladies Skechers Ultra Flex Bright Horizon Jogging Fitness Yoga Trainer All SizesNomad Women's Kelly B Rain Boot Purple Waterproof Boots , Pleaser Pink Label Women's Jenna 06 Mary Jane Cream Faux Leather/Patent Pumps , SUPERGA 2790 ACOTW LINEA UP AND DOWN Canvas Mens Womens Unisex TrainersMerrell Bare Access Flex Purple Black Women Outdoors Trail Running Shoes J09650Pleaser Women's Delight 608 Clear PVC/Rose Gold Chrome , New Balance WXNRGOH D Wide White Grey Women Running Shoes Slip-On WXNRGOHDWOMEN'S UNISEX SHOES SNEAKERS VANS UA ERA [QFKBKA]Pleaser Women's Flamingo-801T Platform Slide Clear PVC/Purple Tinted HeelsBrooks Ravenna 8 D Wide Navy Purple Women Running Shoe Sneakers Runner 120238 1D , Nike Free 4.0 Swoosh Running Women's Shoes Size 6Nike Wmns Air Zoom Fearless FK CITY Flyknit Clear Jade Women Training 902166-301WOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS BASKET PLATFORM RESET WN'S [363313 02] , Pleaser Pink Label Women's Dream 432 Ankle Strap Pump Black Patent Leather PumpsNEW ASICS LADIES WOMENS GEL ANTARES TRAINING RUNNING GYM SNEAKERS RUNNERS SHOESWOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA VIKKY PLATFORM RIBBON [366419 01] , WOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA VIKKY PLATFORM RIBBON [365314 02]Nike Lunartiempo Sky Hi Premium QS Bronze/Citron-Punch Trophy 667616-700Man/Woman Adidas Originals Women's Stan Smith Trainer Elegant appearance Lush design Quality and consumer firstNike Wmns Air Zoom Mariah FK Racer PRM Flyknit Pure Platinum Women 917658-001 , New Womens Reebok CLUB C 85 EMBOSS BS9526 WHITE / BLACK US 5.5 - 11.0 TAKSE , New Vans Women's Womens Authentic Shoe Rubber Canvas , Adidas Originals ZX Flux [M21311] Men Casual Shoes Silver/Yellow-White US 7.5Nike WMNS Air Max 90 Ultra Essential [724981-002] Women Casual Shoe Grey US 7.0 , Mizuno Wave Surge Blue White Womens Running Shoes Trainer J1GD1713-21WOMEN'S ASICS - L. GEL-DS TRAINER 20 NC (T579N-0793) - SIZE 11 - 40% OFF , Adidas Originals Womens Stan Smith Trainers Shoes Sneakers BY9919 , Nike Air Huarache Run PRM TXT wmns trainers AA0523 200 eu 38 us 7 NEW+BOX ,
    Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9 ->Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9 -
    Cynthia Vincent Nibble Fringe Bootie - Women's Size 6, BlackGibellieri 775c Black Patent Leather Slouchy Pointy Boots 36 / US 6Man/Woman CREEPER-214 Black Fine workmanship Pleasant appearance Acknowledgement feedbackMan/Woman SKY-308GF Clear Glitter Red Wear resistant the most economical Simple , Isabel Marant shoes/flats, size AUS 7, NWTSkechers BOBS Women's Chill Luxe-Traveler W Boat Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , Kenneth Cole New York Women's Mara MuleGentleman/Lady Air Jordan Eclipse (Black And White) Packaging diversity Wholesale trade Good qualityNew Saint Laurent YSL Galaxy Fushia Flats 37 7/6.5 Paris 10 Ballerine , Aldo Women's Blue Pull-up Sneakers Sz 8 1/2 US / 39 EU Pre-ownedDr. Scholl's Shoes Women's Glad Uniform Dress Shoe, Black, 6.5 M USJ. Crew Women's Roxie Ankle - Tie Green/olive Leather Pumps 9.5 , Coupleof Nude Blush Pink Leather Lily Peep Toe Women 38 8 Ankle Strap Texture , NEW Free People Balkan Black Leather & Tapestry Sandals 36Women's Roger Vivier Canvas Platform Wedges Sandals /Shoes~Size US 9/IT 39 , New Balance M990GL3 V3 990 Running Shoes 13 D 31cm Made in USA**LATEST RELEASE** Nike Tanjun Mens Running Shoes (D) (011)Air Jordan V 5 Black Grape Retro 2013 sz 10.532 New Nike Mens Air Max LD-Zero Running Shoes 848624-004 Pure Platinum 13Nike Hyperdunk Low Lux Black Men Size 10.0 New Rare Authentic BasketballNEW Supreme NYC VANS Motion Logo Era Red Size 10.5 Mens Spring/Summer SS16Mens stylish ankle short zip Boots Pu Leather low platform heel shoes Casual New , [STICO] Womens Non-Slip Rubber Boots Waterproof Cuff Clean Safe WHITE E_n , Peter Millar Men's Taupe Beige Sneakers Suede Canvas Size 9 1/2 Made In Spain , ByTheR Casual Solid Urban Chic Leather Dessert Millitary Leather Combat Boots , Giorgio Brutini Men's Chatwal Slip-On Loafer - Choose SZ/ColorMens Summer Breathable Pointed Toe Party Shoes Dress Formal Floral Korean Shoes , PUMA Women's Basket Heart Glitter Wn Sneaker Black/Silver 8.5 M US , Nike Wmns Air Zoom Pegasus 35 Black Grey Women Running Shoes Sneakers 942855-002AC549 MBT shoes blue green textile women sneakers
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nike Wmns Zoom 2 All Out Low 2 Out II Dusty Shoes Peach White Women Running Shoes AJ0036-200 b2a58e9
    Athletic Shoes