Never miss an update

Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Store Display Model.Have some marks on bottom , prevent return at store.
Style: Ankle Boots Pattern: Solid
Color: Black Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy
Material: Leather Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.)
Brand: Miu Miu US Shoe Size (Women's): 38.5 EUR
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb -

    Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb
    Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb
    JIMMY CHOO CRYSTAL EMBELLISHED BLACK LEATHER SUEDE MOTORCYCLE BOOTS 39 NWOB , MAISON MARGIELA SS17 Laser-Cut Leather Western Boots 40/10 NIB! , Ralph Lauren Collection MADE IN ITALY BLACK OVER THE KNEE RIDING BIKER BOOTS 9 , SUPPER BEAUTIFUL!! ISABEL MARANT RUNWAY 'Mossa' STUDDED ANKLE BOOTS US 9 , Stuart Weitzman Hiline Denim Light Blue Suede Over The Knee OTK Boots Size 6.5 MAUTHENTIC Sartore Black Leather Boots with Box $1170 , Old Gringo Grace Boots - Vesuvio Black - 8.5Jimmy Choo Black Gold Studded Moto Biker Boots Shoes 40.5MAISON MARTIN MARGIELA split toe floral brocade jacquard tabi boots 40 / 10 NEW , VALENTINO GARAVANI high spike heel fringe cuff bootie commando sole boots 37 NEW , Versace Military black leather knee boots with embroidery 40 - 10NIB VALENTINO Black Mary Jane Leather Boots Heels Shoes Size 5.5/35.5Brand New Stuart Weitzman Vanland Over the Knee Boots in Londra Suede , NIB Christian Louboutin S.I.T. Rain 100 Brown Leather Ankle Heel Bootie 35.5 , NIB Saint Laurent Freja Black Blue Leather Zip Ankle 105 Heel Bootie 39.5 $1195 , SAINT LAURENT Paris Bottine Black Leather Buckle Ankle Boots Heel Shoe 38 NIBVERSACE women ankle boots, size 39. $ 1495.00 blue/silver/greenRoberto Cavalli Suede Boots alligator and suedeISABEL MARANT Brown Lostynn Embossed Leather Over the Knee Boots Size 39 9NEW CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN Daf Booty 160 Yellow Suede Platform Heels Shoe EU40 , New Versace Black Leather Thigh High Boots with Tassel 37 - 7 , Christian Louboutin Egoutina Spikes Patent Riding High Flat Boots Shoes 36.5 , Authentic Beautiful Bordeaux/ Red Tom Ford Padlock Boots 37 GR , Stuart Weitzman Lowland Over the Knee Suede Boots Black Size 9.5 M..... , Yeezy Season 5 Leather Croc Embossed Ankle Boots Shoes Heels Grey Gray 36-41Donald J. Pliner Women’s Black Over the Knee Boots Size 7M Brand New , Frankie Stern Camel Lug Sole Cutout Wedge Sneaker Boot , NEW CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN Grey Chaperon Suede Wedge Booties (Size 36) , J-2849258 New Valentino Garavani Butterfly Over Knee Boots Size US 7 Marked 37
    Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb ->Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb -
    G by Guess Harson Womens Boots Dark Brown LL 7 US / 5 UK , Men's/Women's Moccasin Hogan Club Easy to use Wholesale trade Global sales , ara Womens Lissabon Trainers, Schwarz Schwarz, Lava, 7.5 UKNEW Lacoste Ampthill 118 2 Cam Sneaker Khaki , Gentleman/Lady Christopher Kane Burgundy Flat With Ornament High grade Modern and stylish fashion businessCalvin Klein Womens Sz 9.5 Black Open Toe Slingback High Heels ShoesCole Haan Women's Emory Wedge Braid 40MM Pump, Black Patent, 5.5 B US , FLY LONDON LEATHER PERFORATED MARY JANES SHOES YEON MINT GREEN 36 FITS 5.5 TO 6Stuart Weitzman Hubcaps Bullets Sandal Wraparound Leather Platform sz 8.5 , Prada Metallic Jacquard Slide Mule Shoes 39.5 MSRP: $870.00 , Women Rhinestone Crystal High Heel Wedding Bride Party Dress Sandal ShoesWomen's Black Slip On Pointed Toe Block Heel Leather Summer Sandals SHoes SZ , $2600 NEW TOD'S Cognac Brown CROCODILE ALLIGATOR Blue Denim SHOES SANDALS 39Gentleman/Lady adidas Nizza - Blue - Mens durable First grade in its class Vintage tide shoes , Puma Ignite Evoknit Low - Grey - MensDC PURE 300660 HBW WHITE LEATHER MEN US SZ 13Converse Men's Chuck Taylor All Star Oxford Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorNIKE FREE 4.0 FLYKNIT Men's Running Shoes SIZE:11 Black/Orange 717075 009 NEWFILA FX-100 LET IT REIGN 1VB90150-125 WHITE/NAVY BLUE/FIRE RED - STRAP - LEATHERNike Free Run 2017 Mens 880839-001 Black Grey Knit Mesh Running Shoes Sz 7~10.5Mens Adidas Tubular X - S77842 - Cool Red White Trainers , Rare Nike Air Basketball Sneakers Size 11.5 , Puma Work Boots. 630527 'Sierra Nevada Black' Composite Toe Safety. WATERPROOF , Pikolinos Cork 6811 Cuero Leather Ankle Boots Men's 46/ US 12.5-13 ***NEW*** , KICKERS NIELA chaussures baskets cuir Bleu Marine homme 517480 - 10 , Andrew Marc Men's Remsen High Top Sneakers Suede Grey 12 M , Nb~Adidas ULTRA BOOST X XPOSE PRIMEKNIT Runing gym pure energy Shoe~Women sz 8.5Adidas Ultra Boost X Women's 11.5 / Men's 10.5 Running White Pearl Grey CrystalMan/Woman Very Volatile Women's Brescia Western Boot feature Medium cost Personalization trendWomen Pu Leather Waterproof Black Color Platform Shoes Winter Wear Snow Boots
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Miu Size Miu Boot Black Women Ankle Boot mogochinese-29992 Size 38.5 b5bdeeb