Never miss an update

Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Nike
Color: Blue Style: Basketball Shoes
Shade: University Blue US Shoe Size (Men's): 13
FTG NUMBER: UB-0324-54849 Width: Medium (D, M)
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f -

    Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f
    Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f
    Nike Air Max 1 Anniversary OG Game Royal Blue Neutral Grey 908375-101 yeezy nmd , Kith x Nike Air Maestro II 2 QS High Red Scottie Pippen Ronnie Fieg SizeNew Balance MT580 Burn Rubber Size 11 DeadstockBodega x Asics Gel Lyte V 5 Get Wet Vapor Blue Mens Size 10 DS NEW! H44GK-4880 , Premiata Mick 2338 Leather - Fabric Italian Sneakers Blue - BrownAdidas Tubular Doom Chinese New Year. Sz. 12 100 Autnethic.Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Gatorade Lemon Lime Cyber Yellow AJ5997-345 , YEEZY Boost 350 V2 Triple White *BRAND NEW* Adidas Kanye West , Nike Air Jordan 3 Retro [136064-111] Men Casual Shoes Pure White/WhiteAdidas Ultra Boost Grey Shock Mint AQ5931 Mens size 8.5 , Mr/Ms Sneakers Rombaut Odyssey black 42 Economical and practical special function Maintenance capability , Nike Air Zoom Generation QS - SIZE 10.5 - AJ4204-001 OG Kings Rook White Red 1 INEW BALANCE 991.5 CONCEPTS/LAKE HAVASU U.K. MADE/ LIMITED HYBRID EDITION , Men's Brand New Air Jordan 11 Retro Low "Closing Ceremony" Sneakers [528895 103]Gentlemen/Ladies Air Jordan 1 high The Return Louis, elaborate Modern and stylish fashion Authentic guarantee , Adidas NMD R1 PK White Pink Shrimp Glitch Camo Sz 11 US BA8599 Primeknit Boost , Nike Air Jordan Retro 13 Premium Reflective Infrared 23 SZ 10 696298-023 3MNew Nike Air Vapormax '97 - Size 12 - Metallic Silver/Varsity Red - AJ7291-002 , Men/Women Adidas Ultraboost Ado Day One Outstanding features Beautiful appearance Speed ​​refundNEW PUMA FENTY BY RIHANNA CREEPERS SUEDE STAR WHITE MEN'S SHOES ALL SIZESGentlemen/Ladies Jordan Toro 6 Crazy price Has a long reputation Vintage tide shoesYeezy Boost 350 V2 Butter 100% AUTHENTIC!!! Size 9 Deadstock!!Ewing 33 HI - Knicks OG - Alternate Blue/White/Orange - Size US 12Nike Kobe X 10 Elite Low Flyknit iD Multi-Color SZ 11.5 ( 802817-903 )Nike Barkley Posite Max [555097-040] Men Casual Shoes Metallic Silver US 11.0100% Authentic 2004 Nike Air Force 1 "LASER PACK" By Stephan Maze Georges(USED) NIKE JORDAN 13 HE GOT GAME Sz US12 UK11 Legit 309259-104 Playoffs 2013 , Adidas UltraBOOST Grey/Trace Pink | S82022 |Limited Edition Ultra Boos | Size 10 , Men's/Women's Jordan Retro 10 Double Nickel Louis, elaborate Modern and stylish fashion Comfortable and natural ,
    Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f ->Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f -
    New Women's BED STU Becca Tan Rustic Leather Ankle Boots Size 7 , Vince Camuto Baldwin Round Toe Over the Knee Boots, Black, 4.5 US , Mou - Ankle boots - 320965 - Sand , Marc OPolo Womens Sneaker 70714053501603 Trainers, Rot Rose, 6 UKMara & Mine Silver Metallic Snake Embossed Leather Camilla Loafer Flats , El Naturalista Wos Clogs US 7.5 Brown Leather Embroidered Slip On 5551Jeffrey Campbell Oxford Platform Shoes 7.5 Punk Black 90s Women Baird Goth new$495 Givenchy Logotape Espadrilles Black Leather LOAFER SHOES Size 36/6New Christian Louboutin Ballalla White Leather Pointed Flats Size 40/9.5 $575.00 , Stuart Weitzman Womens Shoes Size 7.5 Brown Solid Suede Wedge Clogs Heels Casual , New ANNE KLEIN Women Brown Leather Kitten Heel Pump Loafer Shoe Sz 8 MChinese Laundry Z-Hop Scotch Women Gray Platform Sandal , GIANVITO ROSSI Women US 7M Stiletto Platform Black Leather Slip On 4" Block Heel , Aerosoles Women's Watermark Wedge Sandal Black Faux Leather Zipper , Reebok Size 11.5 M Court Low Black Leather Athletic Sneakers New Mens Shoes NWOBMENS NIKE HYPERFR3SH in colors BLACK / BLACK / ANTHRACITE / WOLF GREY SIZE 9.5New Balance Fresh Foam Paradox Gore-Tex Leather Mid Boot Shoes 8.5 WaterproofNIKE LUPINEK FLYKNIT LOW 882685-001 DARK GREY BLACK COOL GREY DS SIZE: 8.5NIKE AIR JORDAN IV 4 RETRO DUNK FROM ABOVE NAVY GOLD 308497-425 cement alternatNike Air Jordan 6 VI Alternate 384664 113 Air Max sz 10.5KENNETH COLE REACTION DESERT SKY WIND BOOT TAUPE MEN SZ 9 Chelsea UO hmWood N' Stream 6004 Flyway 8” Moc Crème Wedge Waterproof Work Boot 10.5WNEW SANTONI Dress Leather Shoes SIZE Eu 43 Us 10 (R49)Avenger Safety Footwear Men's A7211 Steel Toe BootBacco Bucci Men's Teo Black Leather SZ 8 MSRP 355$ Made in ITALY , CHAUSSURE ITALIENNE MINI BOOT CUIR NEUF JAUNE MOUTARDE LUXE COUSU MAIN , Churchs England Black Leather Wingtip Dress Loafers Men's Shoes 11.5 DAdidas Cloudfoam CF QTFLEX W Women’s Size 9.5 Running Shoes Pink/White DB0242Nine West Women's Bunker Ankle Bootie - Choose SZ/ColorRocco P Boot Python Western Pull On Dark Brown Size 36
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nike Air Jordan I Retro 1 Nike UNIVERSITY 22142 ALPHA OMEGA UNC OG WHITE UNIVERSITY BLUE 316269-142 13 357cd6f
    Athletic Shoes