Never miss an update

Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a




Item specifics

Condition:
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
UK Shoe Size (Women's): 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8
Sole: Rubber Brand: Justin Reece
Occasion: Casual Style: Heeled Ankle Boots
Features: Wing-tip design on toe, Heel Tab, Stitch and punch details on toe and upper Main Colour: Red / Black
Material: Leather Matt with lizard skin pattern Heel Height: Low Heel (0.5-1.5 in.)
SKU: B021067 Heel Type: Block
Fastening: Slip-on with wide elastic panels on sides
Never miss an update

Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a - blurrypron.com

    Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a
    Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a
    Wolverine 1000 Mile Rockford Pull on Bonny Heeled Womens Boots Leather W00809 U5Man's/Woman's Rieker Ladies Ankle Boots 70562 Consumer first Sales Italy Quality and consumer first , Fly London Leal 689 Women Leather Suede Brick Combat BootsTed Baker Womens Sailly Suede Pointed Toe Ankle Fashion Boots , Ladies Vagabond Olivia Casual Sassy Mid Block Heel Zipper Ankle Boots All Sizes , Love from Australia Classic Tall Long Sheepskin Boots Black 4 5 6 RRP BNIB , Ladies Clarks Block Heeled Ankle Boots - Orinoco Oaks , Azuree camel crackle effect patent mid-calf boots, /RRP BNWB , Man's/Woman's Pleaser DELIGHT-600SK-01 fashion auction King of the crowdMen/Women Demonia STOMP-26 High quality and cheap Highly praised and appreciated by the consumer audience businessAigle Aiglentine Women Rubber Black Wellington Boots , HUNTER WELLINGTONS IN HALIFAX & BRADFORD BLACK ORIGINAL WOMENS TALL SIZE 5 , NEW LAZAMANI 57231 ANKLE BOOT GREY WOMENS BLOCK HEEL BOOTSCotswold Shipton Leather Ladies Ankle Boot (FS2881)Ankle Boots Women Leather Autumn Winter Shoes High Heels Back Zipper Pointed Toe , Clarks Melissa Leather Knee High Boot with Elasticated Back Panel - 6 D - Black , Ladies Taurus Country Boots - Holkham EstateRetro New Winkle Picker Goth Pointed Ladies 6 Strap Black Leather Boots RockGentleman/Lady Demonia GRIP-103 Modern technology discount price Superb craftsmanship , Womens Office Ali Chelsea Boots BLACK HIGH SHINE LEATHER Boots , Men/Women Grey Captivate Gabor Ankle Boot 71.680 Fashion pattern Beautiful appearance Very good colorWomens Bogs Amanda Plush Mustard Mid Calf Wellies Wellington Boots UK Size , Pikolinos Packer Ladies Brown Leather Knee Length Zip Boots Size 8 , Clarks Originals Clarkdale Tone Womens Dark Tan Leather Ankle Boots - 7 UK , Tommy Hilfiger Corporate Belt Rain Womens Black Wellington BootsIrregular Choice Miaow Black Pewter Womens Ankle BootsClarks**Un Ashburn Black Suede**Womens Slouchy Casual Ankle Boots UK3.5 RRP , Man/Woman Demonia RANGER-105 High-quality Modern design Famous storeMen/Women Demonia RIVAL-309 New Listing Attractive fashion Outstanding function
    Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a - blurrypron.com>Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a - blurrypron.com
    FRYE Women's Melissa Button Short Ankle Boot Brown Size 7.0 RfmgTrinity Ranch Woman's Brown Leather Suede Fringe Cowgirl Boots Booties Size 10 , SANTONI men shoes Dark brown suede wingtip loafer leather flap scalloped edges , Ladies Rieker Slip On Fastening Casual Shoes L0582Versace 19.69 B2235 ST 350 CUOIO COSMO BRANDY Sandals Women's Brown AU , Rodo S7600 450 125 Sandals Women's Beige AUJ. Renee Women's Chesire Low Heel Mule Metallic Multi Leather Slip-on ShoesKlogs Missy Womens Leather Clogs Display Model Shoes White Smooth 7 M* NEW -AUDREY BROOKE PLATFORM WEDGE SHOE SANDAL SIZE 7 1/2NWOT Prada Sz 36 Black Suede Peep Toe Heels Pumps - Made In ItalyFranco Sarto Women's Marketa - Choose SZ/Color , Ivy Kirzhner Wisdom Tartufo Leather Stud Nail Head Chic Minimalistic Wrap Sandal , Propet Women's W3915 Vista Walker Sneaker,White Smooth,8 M (US Women's 8 B)New Balance MX624WN2 Men's 624v2 White Cross Training Running Athletic Shoe , Nike Zoom Superfly Elite Spikes Rio Olympics Volt Pink [835996 999] Size 6 , PUMA Trinomic Disc Blaze CRKL Mens Shoes Leather Sneakers , Men's/Women's Nike Odyssey Running Men's Shoes Elegant appearance Has a long reputation Selling new products , Man's/Woman's Danner Men's 453 Outdoor Boot Fine processing Moderate cost Cost-effective , Calvin Klein Forbes Leather Driver Loafer, Leather Upper, Dark Brown, New , $895 Mens Giuseppe Zanotti Velvet Spray High-Top Sneakers Electric Blue 41 US 8 , Gentleman/Lady Men's Rohde Slippers - 6420 Elegant shape discount Suitable for colorHottest Womens Mens Chic Grey Yellow Leather Speed Flat Trainer Shoes Sneakers , Asics Women's Gel Kayano 22 Running Shoes T597N3393 Purple Silver Pink Sz 6Keds Women's Craze II Sneaker White Twill CanvasNike Air Max 2016 Womens Size 9 orangeNike Womens Huarache Run Ultra BR Trainers 833292 300 Sneakers ShoesPuma Suede Bow Wns Purple Rose Women Casual Shoes Sneakers 367317-05Adidas Originals Women's Ultraboost X 'All Terrain' in Indigo/Ash Peach BY8924Minnetonka womans 3 layer finge boot brown size 8 , Dolce Vita Gino Tan Leather Zip Wedge Ankle Bootie Women's Size 6.5 M*
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Justin Reece Ava Women Leather 22056 Leather mogochinese-22061 Black Ankle Boots 422a42a
    Boots
    >
    ;