Never miss an update


Item specifics

New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Modified Item: No
Upper Material: Leather Style: Ankle Boots
Fastening: Zip Exact Heel Height: 3"
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 36 Heel Height: High Heel (3-4.5 in.)
Style Subtype: Ankle Boots US Shoe Size (Women's): US 5
Main Colour: Black Material: Leather
Sole: Synthetic Theme: Boho, Clubwear, Festival, Goth, Grunge
Occasion: Casual UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 3
Brand: Carvela by kurt geiger Pattern: No Pattern
Heel Type: Block Shoe Size: UK 3
EAN: 5045365316644
Never miss an update


    SALE NEW "Carmella" Nappa Leather Boots Wedge Heel - Size 40 -Made in Spain , Evans AGRA Ladies Tan Suede Chelsea Ankle Boots rrp UK7 EU41 LG02 21 SALEw , Gentlemen/Ladies XTI - 47202 superior The highest quality material Cost-effectiveStunning Genuine Leather Italian PRIMIGI Riding Boots size , Mimco Black Snakeskin Look Leather Ankle Booties Sz 39 In Exc C Pd$399Hot Vogue Womens Ankle Boot Block Heel Zipper Leather Oxfords Square Toe ShoesLADIES WOMENS OVER KNEE THIGH HIGH HEEL STRETCH SUEDE LEATHER BOOTS SHOES SZ 3-8 , Black Leather Boots GINO PUCCI JUNITA Black Ankle Leather Boots size 5 Brand NewCasper High Leg Boots - Black JS47 64Josef Seibel Womens Malena 01 Trainers, Blue Ocean-Kombi 531, 8 UKMIMCO Boots In Original Box Size 6 US , BOGS Frankie Mid Handles Womens Lightly Insulated Gumboots in RedNew Crocs Rainfloe Tall Boot Black Womens Shoes Casual Boots Long , BOGS Berkley Soft Natural Rubber Womens Gumboots With Pull Handles in Blue , GLOSS HUNTER WELLIES WELLINGTONS IN HALIFAX SIZE 12 KIDS MILITARY RED GLOSS , NEW! Minnetonka SUEDE BOHO BOOTS SIZE US 9 or 40Man's/Woman's Country Road Black Leather Boots Economical and practical Online Exquisite workmanship$170 Tony bianco alita pump heels strappy nude suede size 8 , Django And Juliette Gold Ankle Boots Brand New Rrp $180 , Ladies Harley Davidson Double Buckle Detail Ankle Boot 'Inkwood D88805'Country Road Emilia Pointed Boot Black Leather Sz41 NWT Kitten Heel RRP$229Gamins Black Knee High Boots Size 36 , Pura Lopez Black Suede Boots 38 All LeatherBlack/White Wedge Plaform Womens Knee High Warm Snow Boots Slip On Shoes 51302 , New I Love Billy Cappy Navy Womens Shoes Casual Boots AnkleMan/Woman Chloe Studded Ankle Boot (40) service Latest styles Sales online storeWittner Ladies Shoes Black Patent leather Boots , MAGNUM SCORPION LADIES WOMENS SUEDE BOOTS DESERT DARK BROWN BRITISH ARMY SURPLUSStiù Sexy Cindy Knee High Boots LEATHER 37
    Vans Old Skool Sneakers Shoes Red VN000VOK SZ4-13 Limited , Man's/Woman's MENS ADIDAS PUREBOOST MEN'S RUNNING/SNEAKERS/FITNESS/TRAINING SHOES Durable service New design Immediate deliveryNew NAOT Formal style sandal in Black patent leather silver studs, size41 9.5/10Birkenstock Rosemead Women's Slip On Suede Clogs Shoes - Many Colors , Easy Spirit Women's Travelport Mule Grey/Grey Suede 8 W US , Aerosoles Womens Cosmetology Slip-on Loafer- Pick SZ/Color. , Steve Madden Women's Daisie Pointed Toe Pump Pink Multi Synthetic Business Shoes , FIVE WORLDS Womens MANZANILLO Brown Nubuck Open Toe Wedges US-8.5; (936)Womens Open Toe Feather Rhinestone Block Heels Sandals Casual Party Shoes J834Laredo Women's Power Pack 11" 5752 , Christian Louboutin Carteron nude white patent Cork Wedge Sandals 41 11 10.5 10RARE!~ New Balance ML574MWT White Moon Pack 574 Men's Shoes Sneakers Sz 8 NASANike KD Trey 5 V (Black / White) Kevin Durant [897638-012] Mens Basketball 8-12 , Nike Max Air Mens Gray Athletic Shoes 11.5 , New Bed Stu Men's Capricorn Grey Black Shadow Ankle Leather Boots Size 11Converse Unisex Chuck Taylor All Star Low Top Black Sneakers , VINCE Men's Stetson Buck Suede Shoe Retail: $295NEW Converse One Star Pro Suede Ox Mens 11 Black White Speckled Shoes Sneakers , Funtasma Pimp Shoes, Comic Book Hero, Trooper Mens ShoesUS6-11 Mens Genuine Leather Sequins Pointed Toe Wingtips Gold Shoes 4Color Ths01 , Vintage Andhurst Mens Loafer Slip On Shoes Brown Leather Gold Tassel Size 10 EEKenneth Cole New York Men's Suit Yourself US 12 M Brown Leather Dress Shoes $158Montrail Rogue Fly women's Shoe Size 6.5 NIB , WOMENS SZ.7 NIKE AIR HUARACHE CITY LOW AH6804-600 PARTICLE.ROSE NO BOX TOPNike Air Max Axis Womens AA2168-002 Black White Running Training Shoes Size 7 , adidas Originals S81020 Womens Shoes Stan Smith Fashion Sneakersboc Womens Mahers Round Toe Mid-Calf Western Riding Boots Faux Leather 10M NEWDanner Womens 8" Pronghorn L/F GTX, Brown Leather, Gore-Tex Boots, 6 MedWomens Denim Over the Knee Boots Stilettos High Heel Shoes Pointed Toe Sexy LadyWomen Sequins Glitter Ankle Boots Patent Leather Party Nightclub Stiletto Shoes ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.


    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund