Never miss an update

BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: BeautiFeel
Color: Tan Style: Riding, Equestrian
Pattern: Solid Width: Medium (B, M)
US Shoe Size (Women's): 4.5 UPC: 840692155097
Never miss an update

BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0 -

    BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0
    BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0
    NWB Jeffrey Campbell Boulevard Mauve Suede UK3.5/ EU36.5/ US6 - UK9/ EU43/ US11 , Women Boots Suede model BERENICE by HGilliane Design Us 3.5 to 12 , Gentleman/Lady Acne Shoes 276453 BrownxBeigexMulticolor 37 durable stable quality Contrary to the same paragraphLuxe Co. Womens HUN Sheep Skin Round Toe Knee High Cold Weather Black Size 7.0 , Rupert Sanderson Shoes 067680 Blue 36 , Jeffrey Campbell Hartford Boot in Floral Satin available , Gentleman/Lady SARTORE Shoes 764480 Brown 37 Excellent craft Comfortable touch Beautiful and charmingLa Canadienne Women's Irene Ankle Boot Black Suede Size 10.0 , Japanese Harajuku Platform Chunky Heel Cosplay Boots Women Black Leather Buckle , New Rock M373-S33XX Womens Ankle Boots BLACKPour La Victoire Women's Odelle Boot Black Size 6.0vt16925 Chiara Ferragni woman's silver ankle boot , Man's/Woman's MM6 Shoes 354916 Brown 39 Practical and economical At a lower price businessMan's/Woman's Tod's XXW0MT0B13024TB999 boots Women's Black US Excellent craft Attractive fashion Pick up at the boutique , UNDER COVER Shoes 737761 White SGentleman/Lady Chloe Shoes 525547 Brown 36 Durable service Carefully selected materials Beautiful and charmingMan/Woman BALLY Shoes 076910 Brown 39 Customer first discount Preferential price , Men/Women Acne Shoes 312063 White 38 Fashion pattern Impeccable TRUEMen's/Women's SARTORE Shoes 058251 Brown 36 Reliable quality First grade in its class Global sales , Gentleman/Lady SARTORE Shoes 642171 Brown 36 Fine workmanship The latest technology Non-slipNew Rock M.1078-S5 Womens Leather Platform Boots BlackGentlemen/Ladies rag&bone Shoes 074149 Black 37 Year-end special promotions Quality and quantity guaranteed Modern mode , Man's/Woman's SARTORE Shoes 378175 Black 36 New Listing Beautiful appearance Caramel, gentleAndrew Charles D50 VELOUR NERO VITELLO NERO boots Women's Black USMen's/Women's Chloe Shoes 046876 Black 37 Outstanding features Preferred material Seasonal hot saleGIUSEPPE ZANOTTI DESIGN Shoes 051085 Black 38 , Femme chaussures Bottines en Cuir model ASHLEY par HGilliane Design Eu 33 au 44Andrew Charles D76 VITELLO GRIGIO PASHA GRIGIO boots Women's Grey USFemme chaussures bottines cuir model BRENDA Eu 33 au 44
    BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0 ->BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0 -
    Man's/Woman's Steve Madden Womens Bootie- Pick SZ/Color. Fashion pattern discount Acknowledgement feedbackRockport Cobb Hill Women's Abilene Boot, Black, 8 W USMENS CASUAL SKECHERS GRATON BRIME LIFESTYLE MEMORY FOAM CASUAL SLIP ON SHOESLadies Skechers Flex Appeal Trainers Love Your Style '117281'Nike Wmns Flex 2016 RN Shield Green Red Bronze Women Running Shoes 852447-300 , Lucky Brand Women's Lk-Yenata Fashion Boot, Brindle, Size 8.0 US / 6 UKDesigner DRIES VAN NOTEN Platform Block Heels Summer Animal Print 37 Clog WoodenMan/Woman TEEZE-45W Black White Beautiful design Skilled manufacturing Very good classification , Talbots Navy Blue Leather Flat Wedge Strappy Womens Sandals Size 6.5 Shoe , NIB $550 Fratelli Rossetti Spectator Oxford (US 6.5)FINN COMFORT-for sensitive feet quality leather Womens 7 US (4.5 UK) JL-68La Redoute Collections Womens Espadrille Wedges With Rope Sole , Ziera Kumfs Womens Sz US 8 Black Leather Button Mary Jane Comfort ShoesDansko Black Leather Side Button Professional Clogs Shoes Size 41 9.5 , fashion Women's Open Toe Pearl Mid Wedge Heels Creepers Slip On Summer SandalsMan/Woman Diane Von Furstenberg Heels Fine workmanship New in stock Reliable reputationNIB Charlotte Olympia Dolly Black Suede Gold Platform Pumps Sz 36.5 6.5 $795Nine West 25020094 Womens Millee Patent Dress Pump- Choose SZ/Color.ASICS Men's JB Elite V2.0 Wrestling Shoe, J501 N9094 , Nike Zoom Mariah Flyknit Racer Sz 10 Gun Gray , Nike Free RN 2017 Mens 880839-301 Outdoor Green Riverock Running Shoes Size 6 , {CQ1013} MEN'S ADIDAS ORIGINALS CRAZY 8 ADV PK SHOE GREY/WHITE *NEW!* , Mens Ankle Boots Real Leather Zip Block Low Heel Formal Dress [email protected] , Geox Rubbiano ABX Men's Waterproof Suede Ankle Boots , Sperry Men's Size 9.5 Endeavor Suede Boat Shoe Gray Brand New Casual Free Shippi , Converse Mens Size 10 Chuck Taylor All Star X Missoni White Leather Pink RareBelgian Laekenois Print Slip Ons For Women- Express ShippingReebok Crossfit Nano 5 Limited Edition 2016 Women Size 6.5WMNS NIKE METCON DSX FLYKNIT AMP SZ: WMNS 6.5 (878556 001)Lucky Brand Size 6.5 Brooklin Perforated Bootie Black Suede Womens NEW
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    BeautiFeel Women's mogochinese-19373 Mina Ankle Boot Combination Chantilly Combination Ankle Size 4.5 04f96a0