Never miss an update

NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
EAN: 7297500557711
Dimensions: L 13.4 x W 7.3 x H 4.9 inches Brand: NAOT
Label: Naot MPN: 26027
NumberOfItems: 1 Binding: Shoes
PartNumber: 26027-PP9 ClothingSize: 5 B(M) US
UPC: Not Applicable Color: Blue
ISBN: Not Applicable Department: womens
Style: Not Applicable Weight: 8.05 lbs
US Shoe Size (Women's): 36 M EU / 5 B(M) US
Never miss an update

NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578 - blurrypron.com

    NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578
    NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578
    VIA SPIGA Womens Black Leather Wedge Knee High Boots Sz 7 M NEW!NWOB J. Crew Size 7.5 Womens Hadley Black Italian Suede Boots New MSRP $228Vionic Women's Sterling Bootie Black 6.5 M , Jessica Simpson Audrey Black Over The Knee BootCorral Womens Burgundy/Black Studded And Inlayed Snip Toe Cowboy Boot 7.5Propet Women's Holly Winter Boot, Black, 6.5 W USMadden Girl Women's Mobb Riding Boot, Black Paris, 6 M US , New with Box Ann Taylor Livia Side Zip Shooties in Grey Steel Size 6Pajar Women's Adelaide Snow Boot, Black/Black, 37 EU/6-6.5 M US , Gentlemen/Ladies Black Miz Mooz Hannah Boots 9-9.5 High quality and cheap Primary quality Easy lifeColumbia Heavenly Omni-Heat Winter Boots Women's Hiking Snow Waterproof Cozy , Pleaser Women's Ado1020g/b/m Ankle Bootie, Black Glitter/Black Glitter, 10 M USAcne Studios Rise Square-Toed Leather Boots Platform Ankle Leather Shoes EU39Spring Step Women's Naiara Boot, Brown, 39 EU/8.5 M US , Kamik Women's Sugarloaf Snow Boot, Charcoal, 9 Medium US , Man/Woman Madewell Bryce Chelse Boot, Size 6.5 Ideal gift for all occasions Attractive fashion cheaperKAANAS Women's Namib Ankle Bootie, Grey, 8 M USIndigo Rd. Women's Vinna Engineer Boot, Brown, 9 M US , New VALENTINO RED Wooden Heels Boots Shoes Booties 37.5 Handmade Leather Purple , Aerosoles Women's Speartint Ankle Boot,Brown,8 W USAerosoles Women's Ever After Riding Boot, Brown, 6 M USMen/Women Spring Step Women’s Esbella Booties Good design Moderate cost retail price , Jimmy Choo Tulip Camel Kitten Heel Short Boot, Size 8N.Y.L.A. Women's Olygmala Boot, Black, 6 M US , Sperry Top-Sider Women's Britt Black Studs Boot 8 M BSol Sana Women's Rico Boot Ankle Bootie, Black/White Snake, 35 EU/5 M US , BareTraps Women's Hartman Boot, Coffee, 7.5 M USFRYE Women's Gabby Ghillie Stud Boot, Forest Suede, 7.5 M USFRYE Women's Phillip Harness Ankle Boot, Grey Soft Vintage Leather, 5.5 M US
    NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578 - blurrypron.com>NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578 - blurrypron.com
    Levi's Chula Vista Black Mens Leather Trainers Shoes , Versace 19.69 Italia Women's Short Boot Brown STONEClarks Hold Roll Mens Black Leather Shoes G Fitting UK Sizes 7 to 11 (R22F)Man's/Woman's DELIGHT-1018G Pink Neon Glitter main category real Valuable boutiqueNike Air Zoom Pegasus 34 Size 11.5 US Blue Men’s Running Shoes , Callisto Kali Ankle Strap Wedge T Strap, Taupe, 11 US , Man's/Woman's Christian Louboutin 37.5 Brand New main category Upper material Don't worry when shopping , TORY BURCH WOMEN'S LEATHER PUMPS COURT SHOES HIGH HEEL NEW ELIZABETH BORDEAU 348Stuart Weitzman Women's Bowbala Coal Linear Gray Velvet Flat , Womens Office Retro Tassel Loafers TAUPE SUEDE FlatsMen's/Women's CENEDELLA Shoes 896378 Grey 36 Rich design discount price CharacteristicsSteve Madden Women's Teaser Heeled Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorPureSole White Leather Toe-Loop Caroline Slide Sandal 9 NEWMens Puma Mostro London Black Leather Strap Up Trainers Shoes CMC-01003NEW Men's Sz 13D Ralph Lauren Polo Federico White Rip Stop Canvas Sneakers , Nike Air Jordan Ol School Black/White-Cool Grey 317223-013 Men's SZ 9 , ASICS TiGER GEL-MAI G-TX beams from japan (5969NEW ENGLAND OUTERWEAR Men's Shoes 122694 Brown 8 , MHOUSE Men Casual Shoes Driving Moccasin Boats Loafers Sneakers Slip on Y-BAND , Nike Air Berwuda PRM Canvas Suede Mesh Upper Green Men Shoes Sneakers 844978-300 , Gentleman/Lady Moxsters Men's Ball State Sneakers superior Optimal price Caramel, gentle2018 New Spring Mens Slip On Retro Tassels Patent Leather Business Formal Shoes , Mizuno Wave Catalyst Women's Running Shoes Size 7.5Man/Woman Adidas Originals Women's Stan Smith Trainer Elegant appearance Lush design Quality and consumer first , Men/Women OluKai Women's Waipahe Bootie Black/Black Sneakers Crazy price Price reduction renewed on time , Women Adidas BB6498 Adizero Boston 7 Running shoes green white blue sneakers2108 Nike Air Max 95 Gundam Blue White Red Obsidian Boys Girls Size 4Y-7Y New , Adidas Solar Boost Women's Running Shoes BC0674 , Lauren Ralph Lauren Menna Leather Boots Size 8 , KOLLI-010 Sbicca Womens Kolli BootM- Choose SZ/Color.
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NAOT NAOT Women's Sirocco 36 Ankle Bootie, US Blue, 36 EU/5 M US b0fe578
    Boots
    >
    ;