Never miss an update

Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: These were a store return, still in EXCELLENT shape.
Brand: Altra Olympus Pattern: Solid
US Shoe Size (Women's): 9.5 Country/Region of Manufacture: China
Style: Running, Cross Training Color: gray and teal
Material: Synthetic Fastening: Lace Up
Never miss an update

Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce -

    Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce
    Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce
    Puma Suede Classic 36058402 Casual Shoes Red Pink Medium (B,M) Women , Creative Recreation Women's w Savona Sneaker, Caramel, 7 B US , BROOKS ADRENALINE 11 WHITE SNEAKERS WALKING COMFORT WORK SHOES US WOMENS SZ 11 BHoka One One HUAKA Womens Running Shoes Purple Yellow Size US 9 , Asics Gel Kayano 19 Size US 9.5 M (B) Women's Running Shoes Pink T350Q , VANS Style 23 V (2-Tone Leather) Gunmetal Prison Issue Skate Womens 9NEW WOMENS CONVERSE SZ 8 SHOES BLACK SUEDE CTAS MADISON OX , Salomon Womens X Ultra 2 GTX Athletic Support Hiking Trail Mid Shoes Size 9Brand New Womens Black and Grey Under Armour Charged Rebel shoes size 9 , SUPRA Skytop Women's Gold Glittery Shiny Sneakers Sz 5.5 High Tops , Puma Suede Classic 36058401 Casual Shoes Green Medium (B,M) Women , Adidas Samoa BB8984 Casual Shoes Gray White Medium (B,M) WomenConverse Chuck Taylor All Star OX Women's Low Top Shoes White/Silver 555812c 6.5New PUMA Women's WHITE Basket Classic Metal Sneaker Size 6.5 NIBNew Balance Women's WW840 Walking Shoe-W, White/Pink, 10.5 2A US , Nike Court NIke Air Zoom Ultra women's tennis shoes size 7Reebok Walk Ahead Action Rs Walking Women's Shoes , Asics Hyper-RocketGirl 6 Purple Pink Women's Track Sprinting Cleat Shoes (10.5)Reebok Classic Leather Clean Exotics V68797 Women's SZ 10.5New Balance Women's Collegiate 574 Classics Running Shoes WL574AMB Size 10 , ASICS Womens GEL GT-2170 Womens Size 9.5, 41.5 EUR Magenta Yellow GreyAsics Gel-Nimbus 18 Women’s Running Shoes Titanium/White/Turquoise Sz 9.5 GreatReebok Women's Royal Lumina Fashion Sneaker,White/White/White/Reebok Royal,6 ... , New Balance Women's WX88V1 Training Shoe, Blue/Red, 6 B USMan/Woman Columbia Women's ATS Trail Lf92 Sneaker Charming design buy Rich on-time deliveryNEW WOMENS REEBOK ALL TERRAIN FREEDOM RUNNING SNEAKERS SHOES ORANGE 10 BD4513Vans Womens Sk8 Hi Slim Zip Indigo Tropical Blue True White Sz 5 NIB , New Balance 558 Size US 12 D WIDE Women's Walking Shoes White Pink WW558WPNike Air Max Fusion Cross Training Women's Shoes - Size 7 NWB
    Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce ->Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce -
    Dr. Martens Women`s Olive 1460 LIMITED EDITION MIE Brown US 8 Ret.450Les Trois Garcons 81600 Multi-Color Velour Leather Zip Ankle Boots 41 / US 11Hush Puppies Rocki Nolive Zip Up Heeled Leather Ankle Boots (FS5556) , Celeb Christian Louboutin Bianca Nude Patent 120 EU37.5 US7-7.5 UK4.5 , Rockport Women's Total Motion Adelyn Embossed Slide Mule - Choose SZ/ColorPRADA men shoes Black "spazzolato" rois leather plain toe derby with raised soleLadies Padders Wide Fit Casual Shoes - Refresh 2 , Alfani Women's Shoes Classic Platform Pumps Red Suede Size 8M New , Gentleman/Lady carino Shoes 054579 Black 23cm selling price Orders are welcome Elegant and solemnSalvatore Ferragamo Women Heels 10 Brown Leather Tassel Loafers Block Work Italy , Nine West Women's Nordra Patent Wedge Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , US Shoe Size Women Open Peep Toe High Platform Summer Wedge Sandals White, CamelJack Rogers Black White Jelly Sandals Womens Sz 7 Plastic Palm Beach Shoes , Mens Nike KOMYUTER Lifestyle Shoes -Black -Reg $150 -AA2211 001 -Sz 10 -New , Nike Men's Sb Koston Hypervulc Green/Orange Skateboard 844447-318 Mens Size 10 , New Balance 247 Luxe Leather Olive Mens Sneakers Lifestyle New Shoes MRL247NO , *NEW* Jordan Zoom Tenacity Re2pect Respect Jeter AO1556-402 Size 9 *RARE*810171-600 Nike Men Air Epic QS burgundy dark fireberry electric orange , Nike Lebron Soldier 10 X Pinnacle Mens AA1090-100 Black White Shoes Size 10Adidas Equipment Support 93/16 Men's Shoes White S79921Nike Tech Trainer Men's Black/Summit White/University Red 4775016Gentleman/Lady Adidas Energy Boost S.E - CP9762 Crazy price Pleasant appearance British temperamentNIKE JORDAN FLIGHT FLEX TRAINER "DEREK JETER" NAVY/GOLD 715855-402 sz 10.5 , New Caterpillar Men's Cat Footwear Alloy ST,Leather Chocolate Shoes , Johnston & Murphy Men's Cellini Brown Leather Italy Oxford Dress Shoes Size 13MFendi Shoes Sneaker Sz. 6,5 Leather ITALY Man Black 7E09042VB-F0Y2V MAKE OFFERWholesale Lot Men's Sandals RDVOL Casual Beach Flip Flops 24 pairsNew Balance Wl373 Classic Womens Navy Leather & Synthetic TrainersStuart Weitzman Women's Move In Strappy Elastic Sneaker, Gold/White - Size 8 M , Womens Faux Suede Rhinestone Platform Pumps Slim Leg Over the Knee High Boots Sz ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Women's 9.5 ALTRA Gaiter Olympus 2.0 Shoes Running Sneakers Sneakers ALTRA Gaiter Trap Zero Drop 3cccfce
    Athletic Shoes