Never miss an update


Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: The shoes are in excellent condition. They come without the original box but will be safely packaged for shipping.
EU Shoe Size: 45.5 MPN: 44527
Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy Main Colour: Black
Style: Slip Ons Sole: Rubber
Shoe Size: UK 11.5 Occasion: Formal
Product ID: Natural Brand: Fratelli Rossetti
Pattern: Solid Toe: Round
US Shoe Size: 12.5 Lining: 100% Leather
Upper Material: Suede Size Type: Regular
EAN: Does not apply
Never miss an update


    A. Testoni Black Leather Loafers Mens Size 9 , Haflnger Black Wool Loafers / Slip Ons Mens Size 11-11.5 / 44NIB Florsheim Men's Richfield Oxford Shoes Black size 6.5Men's Nunn Bush Holt Cap Toe Oxford size 12 BROWN GROOM GROOMSMAN , ECCO New City Brown Leather Cap Toe 5-Eye Dress Oxford Men's US 14Executive Imperials 320 Mens Loafer US 9.5 E Black Leather Horsebit Toe Shoes , ECCO Edinburgh Men's Oxfords 069, Black, 11.5 US , Carrucci Extra Long Square Toe Rattlensnake Men's Dress Leather Shoes Black 8Grenson (UK10E) Black Monty Tassel Wingtip Leather Loafer Shoes , ALDO Men's Municipio Penny Loafer, Cognac, 7 D US , allen edmonds Cody Shoes Loafers Slip Ons Brown Leather Upper , PETER MILLAR BLACK CALFSKIN HORSEBIT LOAFERS MEN SIZE 11 M , Marilungo Mens Wingtip slip on Brown Ankle Boots dress shoes leather ITALY sz 44Ecco Men's Loafers Slip On Shoes Brown Size 45 US 11 - 11.5 , FLORSHEIM 9.5D Black Leather Kenmoor Long Wing Tips Brogue Oxfords Men's Shoes , KENNETH COLE LOGO MEN'S 7 M BLACK LEATHER SLIP ON LOAFER SHOES MADE IN ITALY , Men's Stacy Adams Dress Shoes Danvers 24964 Brown Bicycle Toe Oxfords Leather 9 , NEW Henry Ferrera Men's BEN Slip-On Dress Shoe Black 8.5 FREE EXPEDITED SHIPPING , John Varvatos Sz 9 Gray Silver Metallic Oxford Derby Crepe Sole Dress ShoeCARLO PIGNATELLI men shoes sz 9 Europe 43 black leather S7146Allen Edmonds Park Avenue 10.5 C Black Cap Toe Oxford Dress Shoe Made USA $425COLE HAAN LUNARGRAND MEN WINGTIP US M M BROWN LEATHER , Florsheim Men's Moto Venetian Moc Toe Slip On Brown CH 13274-215 Sz 10.5Magnanni Mens 8.5 M Brown Apron Toe Oxfords Derby Dress Shoes 100% Leather , Dr. Comfort Diabetic Loafers - Hook Loop Leather Black woman 81/2 x wide Annie , USED FLORSHEIM 20330 WING TIP LEATHER DRESS BLACK FORMAL OXFORDS US 9 1/2 D , Cole Haan Mens Loafers Tassel 11 D Burgundy Leather ShoesBOSTONIAN Vintage Distressed Brown Leather Shoes Sz 11 Made in ITALY Vibram Sole , ZARA MAN Black Fashion Men Oxford Shoes Size US 8.5-9,
    Vintage Womens Faux Suede Pointy Toe Block Heels Knee High Riding Knight BootsPrada Back Zip Suede Platform Boots Burgundy Women Sz 38 *Nike W Air Zoom Pegasus 35 PRM Running Womens Shoes Vast Grey AH8392-002 , Vince Camuto 'Kade' Cutout Suede Loafer Flats Shoes Burgundy Wine 5.5 $110Rocket Dog Women's Acosta Black Daytona Loafer SIZE 8MBetsey Johnson Jenna Raspberry Fabric Evening Sandal Size 8.5 D742/*ReD LeaTHeR Sz 8 EUC Pointy Toe CARRIE Stilettos Heels PUMPs GuESSWomens BETSEY JOHNSON white w/ jewels satin open toe wedding pumps sz. 8 NEW!Womens Roman Gladiator High Heel Stiletto Open Toe Ankle Sandals Boots Shoes ZipWomens 8 38 Roger Vivier Paris Silk Slingback Pumps Shoes High Heels Pink Orange , Free People Women's Sonnet Multi Color Velvet Clogs Retail $128 size 6Nike ZOOM STEFAN JANOSKI Light Bone Team Red White 333824-063 (489) Men's ShoesAdidas Originals ADIDRILL UNISEX SLIPPERS UNISEX MOCCASINS SHOES 36 - 46 , Adidas Cloudfoam Ortholite Mens Athletic Walking Shoes BA8150 US 13 NewReebok Fusion Flexweave Shoe - Men's Running SKU CN2424 Size 8.5 , NIKE Vapor Untouchable Pro Low TD White Black Football Cleats NEW Mens Sz 11.5 , -451 Adidas Y-3 Qasa High Men's Athletic Fashion Sneakers (Men 9 US ) , Men's High Top Military Combat Knee High Zipper Riding Pointy Toe Winter BootsYELLOWING Nike Air Jordan DB 3 Retro Doernbecher Red 3M 2013 2437536 600 Size 13 , New ALEXANDER McQUEEN Men's Black Suede Ankle Boots Shoes EU43 US 10 $1299 Italy , Ariat Men's Challenger Western Cowboy Boot - Choose SZ/Color , FRYE Mens Riley Chelsea Ankle Bootie, Dark Brown, 11.5 D USFlorsheim Magneforce 60759 Men's Size 7.5 WideWomen's Gray/Blue Skechers GoFlex Walk Shoes 99% Excellent Condition Size 10Man/Woman OTBT Women's Pilgrim Bootie wholesale Good market List of explosions , Anne Klein Zasa Slide Fashion Sneakers 980, White Multi, 7.5 USwomens knee high boots block mid kitten heel snow boots ski waterproof shoes US , 18 Women's Ankle Boots Side Zipper Pointy Toe Stilettos Heels Suede Formal ShoesCLARKS Women's Delana Joleen Boot Grey Leather 8 W USZARA NAVY BLUE STRETCH FLAT REAL LEATHER SUEDE OVER THE KNEE BOOTS REF.5006/101 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.


    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Dress Shoes