Never miss an update

Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Reebok
Color: Black Width: Medium (B, M)
Pattern: Solid Material: Fabric
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7 Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.)
Style: Running, Cross Training UPC: 889772285217
Never miss an update

Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007 - blurrypron.com

    Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007
    Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007
    Taryn Rose Womens Freddie Low Top Slip On Fashion Sneakers Quartz Size 8.0 S4IShoes No Think Ally Platinum Camel Glitter Suede Woman Made in Italy Casual SneaShoes Puma Vikky Platform 365603 02 sneakers woman Pink Beige Memory Foam Retrò , Propet Men's TravelFit Walking Shoe Grey Size 9.0 , Man/Woman LE COQ SPORTIF Diamond Gris Excellent craft Sales Italy Comfortable and naturalShoes No Think Ally Bronze Brown Glitter Suede Woman Made in Italy Casual SneakeBaskets Femme DVS Rehab Girls Blue ChambrayReebok Women's Royal Aspire 2 Fashion Sneaker Black/Silver Metallic Size 9.5 , Dirty Laundry by Chinese Laundry Women's fur Ever Fashion White Size 10.0Dolce Vita Women's Tux Sneaker Blush Neoprene Size 7.0 , Naturalizer Womens Jetty Fabric Low Top Zipper Fashion taupe leather Size 11.0Gentleman/Lady Baskets Femme ETNIES Premiere Blue White Moderate price modern Modern modeBlondo Women's Jayden Waterproof Fashion Sneaker Black Leather Size 8.5 , Kenneth Cole New York Womens Kam Ballet Leather Closed Toe Storm Size 6.0JBU Womens Aberdeen Low Top Slip On Running Sneaker Black Size 8.0Baskets Femme DC SHOES UNILITE TRAINER Black Fluorescent PinkUnder Armour Womens street precision Low Top Graphite (100)/Ivory Size 8.5Saucony Women's DXN Trainer Fashion Sneaker Light Tan Size 10.0 , Bloch Women's Criss Cross Dance Shoe Yellow Size 11.5Man's/Woman's MOHI... Shoes 772596 WhitexBrownxMulticolor 37 Queensland real Vintage tide shoesColumbia Women's ATS Trail Lf92 Sneaker MultiColor Size 10.5 , Sneakers Femme DC SHOES STANCE HIGH Metalic Silver PurpleColumbia Women's Twentythird Ave Waterproof Mid Uniform Dress Brown Size 8.0 Z , Penny Loves Kenny Women's Techno Fashion Sneaker Rose Gold Size 7.5Women Casual Shoes 2016 New Fashion Women Shoes Mesh Shoes Woman With Breathable , Propet Women's Harper Leather EVA Fashion Sneakers Black Size 9.5 , Vince Camuto Womens BILLENA Low Top Slip On Fashion Smoke Grey Size 11.0 , All Black Womens Tassel Sneaker Low Top Slip On Fashion Dk Grey Size 5.5Steve Madden Womens Goals Low Top Slip On Fashion Sneakers pewter Size 7.5
    Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007 - blurrypron.com>Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007 - blurrypron.com
    Lady Rebel by Durango Texas Flag Pull-On Western Boot , Man/Woman Sergio rossi Shoes Grey 34 Queensland Elegant and sturdy packaging high quality product , Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 SE [876005-002] NSW Running Black/WhiteNew Balance SDL800NV D Navy Blue One Click Men Sandal Shoes SDL800NVDNew Django & Juliette Jinnit Red Tan Womens Shoes Casual Sandals Sandals Flat , KELSI DAGGER BROWN SLIDES BUSINESS DRESS CLASSIC HEELS SHOES WOMENS SZ 9 , Womens Brown Cow Leather Platform Wedge Roman Gladiator Sandals High Heels 78234 , Loeffler Randall Women's Lottie Nubuck Dress Pump, Red, 7 M US , LOEFFLER RANDALL KENNA-C Womens Kenna Mule- Choose SZ/Color.Puma Men's Ignite Evoknit Lo Ankle-High Running ShoeNew Reebok Men Control Hex 2 Running Training Shoe Wht/Grey/Navy J13398 Size 9Nike Zoom Hyperrev 2016 PE Draymond Green White Metallic Gold Size 7.5 (3991)CONVERSE GRANDSLAM ONE STAR SIZE US 6.5 160593C , New Balance Men MH988XBK black gray MH988XBKNike Air Jordan Flight Club '91 Basketball Shoes Black Gold 555475-031 Men's 10Rocky Men's Puncture-Resistant Military Jungle Boot - Round Toe - RKC071Vtg Tony Lama Cowboy Boots Suede Bull Shoulder Pointy Toe Gray & Black 10 D , Columbia Men's Newton Ridge Plus Ii Suede Waterproof Hiking Boot , Ralph Lauren Polo Mens Sanders Canvas Casual Shoes , CROCKETT & JONES HARLECH, E, DARK BROWN SHELL CORDOVAN CAP TOE BOOT , Fashion British Mens Rivet Pointy Toe Block Heels Leather Shoes Party Bar ShoesCONVERSE SKATEBOARDING CTAS PRO HI MENS SHOES BLACK WHITE LEATHER MSRP$70 F , Allen Edmonds Presidio Burgundy Leather Slip On Penny Loafers Shoes Sz US 9.5 DSalomon Women's Ellipse GTX Thyme/Asphalt/Green Hiking Shoes 6MGalactic Groove Skechers Black Leather Rise Fit Iridescent Wms Hightops NWT DISCGentleman/Lady Women's Teva Arrabelle Universal Wedge Leather Easy to use Wholesale trade Shopping promotion2011 Nike Air Max 90 Premium VT Felt MultiColor QS 5.5 Tweed Trainer 472513-001Authentic Nike M2K Tekno White White Pure Platinum AO3108 100 Casual Women size , TBL-2 NWOB ONITSUKA TIGER KNEE HIGH BOOTS RARE sneakers quilted winter HN582 8 , Keen Targhee II Mid Hiking Boot - Women's Size 11 - Brown/Light Blue
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Reebok Womens Twistform Twistform Blaze 3.0 MTM Womens Fabric Low Fabric Black/White/Pewter Size 7.0 99fe007
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;