Never miss an update

PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 0191239765676
Size: 7 B(M) US Brand: PUMA
Style: Sport Model: 19000305
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7.0 MPN: 19000305
Size Type: Regular Color: Puma Black-puma White
EAN: 0191239765676
Never miss an update

PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d -

    PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d
    PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d
    Nike Womens Dualtone Racer Se Running Trainers 940418 Sneakers Shoes 005Men's/Women's FRYE Women's Melanie Mule Sneaker Selling Sales Italy Acknowledgement feedbackAdidas Originals Superstar Womens Trainers Sneakers BB2141 Shoes , Nike Womens Roshe One ENG Running Trainers 833818 010 Sneakers ShoesPropet Women's TravelFit Sneaker Purple 10 2E USNew Balance Women's WT410v5 Cushioning Trail Running Shoe Black 8 D USKeds Women's Triple Kick Canvas Fashion Sneaker , Champion Women's Gusto Cross Trainer Black Black 8 B(M) US , Nike Benassi Duo Ultra Slide Womens Style : 819717 WHITE Size 7 , PUMA Women's Basket Platform Lux Wn Toreador-Toreador 6 M USPUMA SUEDE REMASTER WN'S-W Womens Suede Remaster Wns Fashion Sneaker, PumaNike Air Max Fury Womens Running Trainers Aa5740 Sneakers Shoes 008ASICS Women's Gel-Corrido Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , New Balance Women's 669v1 Walking Shoe Grey/Rose Gold 6.5 D US , K-Swiss Women's Hoke CMF Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorVibram Five Fingers Kso Grey/Palm/Clay Womens Exercise Fitness Shoes Size 36M , Adidas Womens Tubular Defiant Fashion Sneaker Black/Black/Core White S75249 , Skechers Performance Women's Go Walk 2 - Backswing Walking Shoe Grey/BlueReebok Women's Speed Her TR Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorPropet Women's TravelActiv Mary Jane Fashion Sneaker Black 8 W USPuma Women'S Basket Satin En Pointe Wn Sneaker , Skechers BOBS from Women's High Notes Wedge Boot Black/Black 8 M US , Saucony Men's Excursion TR11 Running Shoe, Grey Green, 8.5 Wide US , Tretorn Women's Nylite Plus Fashion Sneaker Vintage White/Green 8 B(M) US , PUMA 35447305 Womens Axel Cross-Training Shoe- Choose SZ/Color. , Nike Air Max Thea Womens 599409-415 Industrial Blue Mesh Running Shoes Size 6.5 , nike womens roshe LD-1000 trainers 819843 002 sneakers shoes , nike womens free 5.0 TR FIT 5 PRT running trainers 704695 500 sneakers shoesReebok Women's Freestyle Hi Walking Shoe Black 8 B(M) US ,
    PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d ->PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d -
    Bear Paw Women's Winter Boots Boetis II With Curly Lamb Hair White , Mr/Ms NCAA Navy Women's 13-Inch Gameday Boots Crazy price cheapest Caramel, gentle , FREEBIRD Peak Steven Drover Black/Silver Leather Motorcycle Boots Women Size 5 , Ariat 10019926 Zealous 8.5 B Tan X Snip-Toe Wingtip Cowgirl Fashion Riding Boots , Birkenstock Papillio SALE - Ellen - Graceful Licorice - Black - Size 38Gentlemen/Ladies Demonia EMILY-303 Good design Attractive fashion classic styleMen's/Women's Nine West Women's almamater Sandal Louis, elaborate Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad ExportRockport Women's Total Motion Novalie Ankle Strap Shoe Warm Iron Kid Suede , Crevo Women's Kleo Mule Tan Suede ClogsVictoria Women's Safari Lona Tintada Fucsia Canvas Shoes , SJP Gold Leather Open Toe Slingback Sandals Women's Size 38.5 M*Rebecca Minkoff Bridget Too Women’s Embroidered Pumps , Butter Platform Sandal Sz 6,5- 7 Nyde Leather Made in Italy $230Elegant Womens Open Toe Bowknot Mid heel shoes SandalsVia Spiga Women's Izett Espadrille Wedge Sandal, Beech Suede, 6 M US , VINTAGE AVIA 800 MB BASKETBALL REFEREE SHOES SZ. 9.5 DS , Saucony Zealot ISO 2 Men Sizes 11.5-12-13 Medium Blue/Silver/Slime S20314-1 NEW!Mens Size 7.5, Jordan Air Force 1 Retro 3/4inch hi Shoes Red/white/grayAdidas Originals Iniki Runner Boost Goldenrod Core Black Yellow White BY9733 NMDNIKE ROSHERUN GPX PREMIUM GEOMETRIC SUMMIT MENS RUNNING SHOES - MENS SIZE 9NEW DR. MARTENS MEN'S MAYPORT 2-EYE DESERT BOOTS GRAY WOOL 8 MEDIUM 7 UK $70 , New Men Pointy Toe Buckle Strap Slip On Leather Dress Formal Shoes Loafers , Asics Size 7 Defiance X CrossTrainer Gray Sneakers New Womens ShoesReebok Womens Royal Transport Tx Fashion Sneaker 7 M- Pick SZ/Color.Nike Zoom Pegasus 33 GS Pink Black Kid Youth Junior Running Shoes 834317-601GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI Black High Top Leather Studded Trainers, , Adidas AQ0192 Women Adizero adios 3 Running shoes black blue sneakers , Pleaser DELIGHT-1015 Womens Black Faux Leather Matte Heel Platform Mid-Calf BootMatisse Kasha Boots Size 8.5 M Womens Brown Leather High Heel Slouch Buckle S515 , Womens Over the Knee High Boots Side Zipper High Block Heels Winter Warm Shoes
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    PUMA Netfit 19000305 Womens Ignite Dual 7 Netfit Wn Cross Cross Trainer, Black White, 7 M US ac9185d
    Athletic Shoes