Never miss an update

Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Some wear on bottoms- overall good
Style: T-Strap Sandals Pattern: Animal Print
Fastening: Buckle Color: Multicolor
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7 Occasion: Casual
Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in) Brand: Rachel Zoe
Material: 100% Leather Heel Type: Block
Never miss an update

Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951 - blurrypron.com

    Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951
    Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951
    DONALD J PLINER Bronze/Animal Print Sandals, Size 10, NWOB, NordstromDv By Dolce Shoe Size 7.5 / 8.5 M Leather Black Flat T-Strap Sandal Women'sSpenco Kholo Women's Orthotic Slide Sandals Patterned Oynx - 6 WideIvanka Trump Easta Black Womens Shoes Size 9.5 M Sandals MSRP $120Vince Camuto Womens Shoes Rochela Wedge Sandals Black Suede Size 7.5Wolky Women's Black Patent Leather Sandal Size 9.5 Euro 41 Comfort Ankle Strap , Taryn Rose Black Leather Wedge Slip On Tamera 7M WomensRACHAL ZOE MADDI WOODEN PLATFORM OPEN TOE SHOES NEW SIZE 9 $298.00 , Kenneth Cole New York Viola Leather Sandal, 7 , FitFlop Women's Love and Hope T Strap Thong SandalsPropet 'Breeze Walker' Sandals Purple Leather Sz 6M Worn Once! , Jambu Women's Romance Platform Sandal, Navy, 8.5 MWolky Fria Black Crackled Suede Leather Strappy Heeled Sandals 39 / 7.5 - 8 US10 Crosby Derek Lam Womens Sandals Heels Size 9 Blue Black Leather Open Toe , Sam Edelman Women’s Lime Green Patent “Oliver” Flip Flops Thongs “Sz 13” !NEW! , Women's NAOT MIRACLE Platform Patent Leather Ankle Strap Sandals US 9 , Naot Sandals White Leather Closed toe 42 EUR/US 11 WomenVince Solana Black Womens Shoes Size 8 M Sandals MSRP $250Wolky Jewel bronze leather slingback wedge comfort sandals US 11 , FRYE Womens Carla Criss Cross Open Toe Casual Slide Sandals , Naturalizer Women's Andrea Open Toe Sandal HD3 Black Woven Size 7M , CHACO Women's Unaweep Strap Aqua Green Purple SPORTS Hiking Sandals 10M , New With Box- Nicole double band leather wedge heels - black - size 6.5 MStubbs & Wooten Palm Beach Italian Pink Frog Needlepoint Leather Sandals 5-1/2SAS Trio Bone Comfortable Leather Sandals, Made in USA Womens Size 11M , NIB Nike Women Sport Slide Sandals Flip-Flop Pool Slippers Beach Shoes Size 5-18NEW Jessica Simpson Rainah Buff New Ruby Tumbled Heels Shoes Sandals Beige 6.5 , New in Box! BareTraps Bareflips Gemini Bronze Snake Sandal - Size 9M - ComfortSkechers Cali Womens Monarchs Blue Nights Wedge Sandal- Pick SZ/Color.
    Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951 - blurrypron.com>Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951 - blurrypron.com
    Miz Mooz Women's Tennessee Loafer - Choose SZ/Color , FRYE Jane Strappy Short Womens Boot- Choose SZ/Color. , AH994 BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB shoes brown textile suede men sneakersNEW WITH BOX TAMARA MELLON WOMENS ICON KNEE HIGH BOOT 105 NAPPAMerrell Women's Sylva Mid Buckle Waterproof Boot Black 11 M US , Tory Burch Ballerina Flats Carlyle Woven Leather Pink Bow Ballet Shoe 9.5Andre Assous Women's Lina Espadrille Wedge Sandal Platino Snake Embossed Leather , NIB CELINE MULTICOLORED FLAME CANVAS SLIP ON SKATER SNEAKERS 39.5 $670 , Men's/Women's Valentino Black Leather Flats, Size 7 Reputation first At a lower price Rich on-time deliveryFashion Casual Womens Flat Heels Loafers Slip On Moccasins Faux Suede Boat Shoes , Nine West Women's Joylyn Leather Dress Pump - Choose SZ/Color , JIMMY CHOO 220862 coral suede leather slingbacks pumps heels shoes sz.Red Valentino Women Blue Canvas Strap Star Charm Slide Sandal Sz37/ US 7~RTL$320Adidas Originals EQT Support RF Core Black,Turbo White size UK-8 brand new , Mr/Ms AIR FORCE 1 Fashion pattern Impeccable fine , Vintage 2003 Nike Air Trainer 1 Premium Brunnet/Brunnet-Net sz10.5 305843-221 , NWT NIKE Flylon Flyknit Train Dynamic Prem Running Shoes 882105-400 Size 12Nike Air Max 90 Ultra Superfly - 850613 001FRANKIE MORELLO ZIG ZAG PATTERN SNEAKERS NEW W TAGS SOLD OUT 8.5 US 7.5 EU , Madden Men's M-Feathr Loafer, Grey Suede, 9.5 M US , NEW ASICS SAFETY SHOES FIS 52S WIN JOB - VARIOUS SIZE , Cole Haan Men's Pin Weekender Slip-On Loafer - Choose SZ/Color , New Balance Running Shoes Lightweight Leather Black Pink Lime Women's size 7.5 M , New Mizuno 410874.7313 Wave Horizon Silver / Pink Women's Running Shoes 6.5 US , New Balance WRT580 Lifestyle Women Athletic Shoes WRT580BK black WRT580GY grey , ASICS Men's Gel-Encourage Le Tennis Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorG.H. Bass & Co. Women's Naomi Chelsea BootHH Brown Women 9 M Boots Gore Tex Leather Hiking Brown 6067 Hand Crafted Korea$159.99 BCBG BCBGeneration Women Wexler Tall Napa Stretch Boot Shoe, Black, US 8 , Embossed Genuine Leather Womens Ankle Boots Pointed Toe Mid Block Heel Ske15 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Rachel Zoe Size 7 Gwen Print Gwen Sandals Dot Buckle mogochinese-19697 Flat Womens Casual Animal Print 82a7951
    Sandals
    >
    ;