Never miss an update

Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Binding: Apparel
PartNumber: 12345465646 Department: womens
MPN: 12345465646 Label: Nine West
UPC: Does not apply Manufacturer: Nine West
Style: Does not apply Model: Gleace Suede
Brand: Nine West ProductGroup: Shoes
Size Type: Regular Publisher: Nine West
US Shoe Size (Women's): Does not apply
Never miss an update

Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b -

    Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b
    Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b
    Nine West Women's Tatiana Suede Dress Pump - Choose SZ/color , Circus by Sam Edelman Women's Phoenix Ankle Boot - Choose SZ/colorColumbia Women's Redmond Hiking Boot - Choose SZ/colorBoot Nine West Kellan 2 Black 2 Fabric , Gentlemen/Ladies Cory Tall Grey Wedge Australia Attractive and durable Affordable uniqueGentlemen/Ladies free people shoes 39 New Listing Various types and styles Caramel, gentle , Patricia Green Women’s Brown Sport Zipper Snake Embossed Boots , Blondo Womens Liberata Cafe Brown Suede Ankle Boots WaterproofGentlemen/Ladies Tory Burch Grace riding boot Exquisite (middle) workmanship Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad General productMan/Woman Boot Nine West Holdon Black/Black2 Leather New Listing Carefully selected materials Excellent function , Nine West Women's Speakup Leather Pointed Toe Flat - Choose SZ/colorBoot Nine West Kellan 3 Black Synthetic , New FRENCH CONNECTION Zinfandel Berta Oxford Bootie Woman Size US 8.5Dr. Scholl's Shoes Women's Look Ankle Bootie - Choose SZ/colorSam Edelman Women's Rudie Studded Fringe Suede Bootie Grey 6054 Sz 9 MNEW COLE HAAN $275 DARK BROWN BOOTS SIZE 6 , New Womens The North Face Shellista II Shorty Gray Waterproof Boots NF0A2T4ZNHHSam Edelman Rudie Studded Fringe Grey Bootie 7867 Size 10 W , Skechers Sport Women's Flex Appeal 2.0 Simplistic - Choose SZ/colorSam Edelman Women's Hannah Belted Chelsea Bootie 7833 Size 7.5 MLucky Brand Womens Basel Leather Almond Toe Ankle Cowboy, Old Bronze, Size 10.0 , Gentlemen/Ladies Tamaris 1-25508-21 Women Black Leather Boots New product In short supply high quality product , NEW CIRCA JOAN & DAVID DARRAN Brown Boots Sz. 6.5MDolce Vita Neely Over Knee Women's Light Brown Boot Sz 8.5 2850 *Gentlemen/Ladies Vince Camuto Womens Karita High security stable quality Fair price , Men's/Women's Tamaris 1-25603-21 Women Black Leather Boots Easy to use The latest technology cheap priceHush Puppies Women's Sherlyn Malia Heeled Sandal - Choose SZ/colorMyra Tassel Bootie, Brown or Black, Size 5.5 - 10M Frye $398 NIBMen/Women Boot Born Phobos Grey Suede Louis, elaborate Used in durability Preferred boutique
    Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b ->Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b -
    Stuart Weitzman Womens Shoes Size 8.5 Black Textured Man Made Ankle Boots , Serena D'Italia LADIES KNEE HIGH CALF SKIN FLAT HEEL ITALIAN BOOTS Dark Brown , DIANE von Furstenberg Honey Wheat Suede Knee High Boots / Wedges Sz. 7 MSRP $498 , Womens Genuine Leather Fashion Buckle Pull On Block Heel Mid-Calf Boots Shoes SZ , Ladies Brown Suede Leather Zip Up Chukka Ankle Boots with 2.5" Heel ANNETTE , Under Armour Speedform Slingshot 2 Black White Women Running Shoes 3000097-001 , New Django & Juliette Ofive Womens Shoes Casual Sandals HeeledRalph Lauren Brown Leather Platform Wedge Heels Shoes Size 9.5Banana Republic Women's Black Beige Open Toe Suede Italy Shoes Sandals Size 7.5NEW Free People Monaco Clogs Embroidered Velvet US 9 Heels Pink YellowChic Women Gold Sheepskin Leather Mid Heels Ankle Strap Sandals Party Pumps NewJessica Simpson Royal Blue Suede JP-JUBELLE Dress Pumps Women's Size 10 , NEW MERRELL ENOKI TWIST GREEN STRAPPY SANDALS WOMENS 11 (J35362) FREE SHIPK-Swiss Training Shoes ST 329 Black Leather Comfortable Sneakers Men Size , Nike Air Huarache Bball 2012 Qs Free Fab 5 Retro Vtg Vintage Size 11 OG , New Nike Shox Gravity AR1999-002 Men Casual Shoes Black White Running size 8.5Nike Free Train Virtue Training Shoes Man US 8.5 Red Orange 898052-600 NEW $120Men's Nike Air Max Triax '94 Athletic Fashion Sneakers 615767 401 Wolf Grey , Nike Air Zoom Dunkesto Low Size 9.5 Style Zen Grey & Navy & Maize , Nike Presto Fly 908019-003 Wolf Grey White Men's Sportswear Running Shoes NEW!NIKE AIR JORDAN SUPER FLY 5 PO WHITE BLACK 881571 110 SZ 11 , Nike Womens Air Max 1 Ultra Plush Running Trainers 844882 003 Sneakers ShoesNEW MENS SZ 9 NIKE METCON 3 (852928 007) DARK GREY/HYPER CRIMSONAdidas Originals by Alexander Wang Hike Lo Men's Size 9.5Men's 9" Florsheim Black Waterproof Composite Toe Logger Work Boot Size 11 EEEAdidas Originals Yeezy Boost 350 V2 Bred Red Black Size 9NEW JO GHOST Burnished Ombre Combat Ankle Boots Wingtip 45 US ITALY Made , Andrew Charles 8309 CERVINO VINACCIA Loafers Men's Dark Red US , Nike Zoom Winflo 5 Womens 8.5 Black Swarovski Crystal Swoosh Running ShoesChristian DIOR Fusion Black White Yellow Flower Embroidered Trainer Sneaker 36
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nine West Women's Gleace Suede Gleace Dress Sandal Women's - Choose - SZ/color d05ff5b