Never miss an update

New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f




Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Brand New
Brand: Nike UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 7.5
Model: 819303-009 Style: Running, Cross Training
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 10 Country/Region of Manufacture: Indonesia
Type: Low Top Width: Medium (B, M)
Material: Mesh, Textile Color: Gray
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 42
Never miss an update

New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f - blurrypron.com

    New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f
    New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f
    Converse Chuck Taylor All Star XX Hi Knee High Sneaker Charcoal Gray Size 7New Women's PUMA Basket Heart NS Opulence Sneaker - 364108-02 White[BD3571] Womens Reebok x Face HI 35 Classic Sneakers - Courage Wisdom , Sperry STS81163: Top Sider A/O 2-Eye Womens Sand Boat Shoes , Under Armour Women's Micro G Assert 6 Running Shoes Steel/London Orange NWT , New Balance Women's L410 Ankle-High Leather Fashion Sneaker , New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Cruz Shoes BlueNike Women's Tanjun Print Blue Glow/Blue Glow/Copa Running Shoe , New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Cruz Decon Shoes Blue , Nike Cortez Ultra Look Green Womens Sneakers 872783-300 Size - 7.5Puma Sky II Hi Future Minimal Basketball Fashion Red Sneakers Shoes Womens 8 , Nike Air Max Tavas Casual Walking Shoes Women's Size US 5 Black White 916791 001New Nike Air Max 1 Ultra Royal Mulberry Womens US Size 9.5 , New Balance W420LG3 Light Black/White/Pink Women's Running ShoesNEW BALANCE WT10 (GP2) WOMEN'S 10 TRAIL RUNNING SHOE - FALL FITNESS SALE!NIKE AIR MAX JEWELL WOMEN'S BLACK/GREY/WHITE SHOES, $100Saucony Women's Peregrine 7 Running Shoe, Grey Berry, 6.5 Medium US , Nike Women's Huarache Run Ultra BR Shoes Orchid Sunset Glow 833292-501 Size 6.5 , New Women's PUMA Fierce Knit Training Sneaker - 190303-02 WhiteNEW BALANCE 005 CLASSICS WOMENS B Medium Width WL005EO NEWBrooks Running SHOES Women's glycerine 13 athracite/icegreen/hollycock 5.5B , New Balance 574 Classic Sneakers/Shoes Women’s Size 7.5 Blue WI574OIA NEW! , Nike Women's Downshifter 6 White Blue Silver Running Shoes Size 7.5 , Nike Air Max Women's Size 10Asics Women's Gel-Cumulus 17 Ankle-High Running Shoe , NIKE WOMEN'S FREE TR FLYKNIT SHOES SIZE 11 retro white teal volt 718785 400 , Nike Classic Cortez STR LTR Black 884922-001 Womens Size 7.5 , ASICS WOMENS GT 1000 5 T6A8N RUNNING SHOES[S79864] Womens Adidas Originals Tubular Defiant Primeknit Sneaker - Black ,
    New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f - blurrypron.com>New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f - blurrypron.com
    Kenneth Cole Jenni Pull-On Ankle Booties, Desert, 8.5 US / 39.5 EUHAIDER ACKERMANN 'RUNWAY' HI HEEL BLACK OVER THE KNEE BOOTS US 10Stuart Weitzman Playtime Black Suede Over The Knee Boots Size 8 M , New Wolverine Tarmac 6 Inch Side Zip Mens Black Safety BootsMarco Tozzi Stretch Insert Heel Boot Womens Black Chelsea Boots - 42 EUNew Sol Sana Lori Boot Womens Shoes Dress Boots Ankle , women black or red stiletto heels pointed toe zipper ankle boots shoes size sexySTUART WEITZMAN SLIPBEADS Beige Suede Designer Loafers Comfort 6.5 M , BADGLEY MISCHKA Black Satin Fabric - Crystals Sling-back Sandals SZ 8 MBetsey Johnson Blaik Women US 10 Black Sandals Heels NWB , Gianvito Rossie Brown Suede "Marcy" Heels, Size 10 (US) 40 (IT) NIB! $725!CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN Kristali 37.5/7 Black Patent Burma AMAZING DEALValentino Rockstud Studded Purple Patent Leather Strappy Sandal Heels Shoes $995 , New Brooks Vantage Heritage Collection Men Shoes Sz.9 bvrLi Ning Way of Wade Announcement Mens Basketball Shoes Size 10 Black Red WhiteVANS OTW TESELLA SZ 9 OFF THE WALL 3D ALOHA WHITE ON WHITE VN 0VOAGNHNike air max 98 supreme Snakeskin serpent 844694-100 , Adidas Yeezy Boost 350 V2 Blue Tint B37571 Size 9.5 MensRockport V82622-702 Mens Get Your Kicks Mudguard Sneaker- Choose SZ/Color.550$ Bally Dramer Blue Ocean Suede Driver Size US 11.5 , Mens Allen Edmonds Urbino 7.5 D Black Leather Tassel Dress Loafers A041Nike Shox sz 9.5 Qualify 2+ Running Sneakers Shoe Black/Red 442115-060 Women , Unlisted by Kenneth Cole Men's Design 30134 Slip-on Loafer , VANS Sk8 Hi Reissue (Cord & Plaid) Frost Gray High Top Skate Women's 8.5Fitflop Womens FSporty Uberknit Black Sneakers Shoes 10 Medium (B,M) BHFO 2302Calvin Klein Jeans Womens Dora Canvas Fashion Sneaker- Pick SZ/Color.Women's Nike Shox Gravity Shoe - Metallic GoldVery Volatile Womens Sava Western Boot- Pick SZ/Color.GABRIELLA Italy Black Leather Booties Size 39 / US 9 M Worn 3x , Astral Porter Water Shoe - Women's Navy/White 10.0
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    New Women's 10 Training Nike Revolution 3 Athletic Grey 3 Running Athletic Training Shoes 819303-009 85bb76f
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;