Never miss an update

PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: preloved. scuffs,nicks and wear on leather and heels
Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy Width: Medium (B, M)
Style: Sandals Color: black/white
US Shoe Size (Women's): 38 Brand: PRADA
Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.) Heel Type: Slim
Material: Leather UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157 - blurrypron.com

    PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157
    PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157
    NEW $295 Icon High Heel Peep Toe boots Bootie Leopard Two Cougars 7.5 M BAMBI 8 , Pleaser FLAMINGO-808MSLG Womens Clear Aqua Multi Glitter Heel Ankle Strap SandalPleaser 8" studded rhinestone black slip on shoes , YSL YVES SAINT LAURENT BLACK WOVEN STRAPS 3.5" HEEL SANDALS SHOES 7.5 NEAR MINT!$895 JIMMY CHOO Pink Suede Patent Leather Mandie Sandals Heels Woman's Sz 41 , New Madewell for J Crew Women’s Highgate Pump Burnt Umber $198 16145 Sz 6.5Size 42 Thierry Rabotin Women’s Shoe Slide Ankle Heels Black Suede Microfiber , LOEFFLER RANDALL BLACK ALIX Open Toed Bootie Block Heel Sandals Leather Boot 6 MGiuseppe Zanotti High Heel Jeweled Ankle Strap US 7.5 Satin Stiletto 3" , CHARLES JOURDAN FERGY -BLACK X-STRAP PEEP TOE PLATFORM HEEL $325.Kendall & Kylie Women's Haedyn 5 Sequin Bootie , New - Vivienne Westwood Lady Dragon Heels US6 EU36 UK3Fendi shoes Made In Italy Red Satin Swarovski Crystal Evening Heels Size 6 MFABULICIOUS Open Toe Wedge Hidden Platform Pump Rhinestone ISABELLE-18 Black , JCrew $238 Leopard-Print Leather Heels Sz 7 Black Amber Block Shoes G0932Loaffler Randall Polka dot Pony Hair Fur Mary Jane Platform Heels Pumps 8B NewBadgley Mischka Divine Glitter Heels , Size 6 , PRADA Leather Brown/ Blush Floral Women’s Slides Sandals Heels Shoes SZ 37 1/2NEW Anthropologie Starlet Glitter Heels Size 10 Gray Suede , Jimmy Choo Womens Shoes Size 39 Red Suede, Leather Pointed Toe Kitten HeelsShoe Republic La Women's Shoe Size 9 Gold/Multi Colorwomens formal slip on wedding brides stilettos high heel metal decor pumps shoesCordoba Red Leather FLY London YANI Wedge Pumps Shoes Sz 38 US 7.5 8 NEW NWOBWomen's CULEKA Hand Made - Black Patent Leather Wedge Heels Shoes - Size 6 (1)NEW! NIB! L.A.M.B. Nude Leather & Suede KELLSIE Mary Jane Back Zip Heel 6 M $275Mr/Ms Vivienne Westwood Women's Holly Dress Pump Moderate price Quality First buy onlineTory Burch - Leather Wedges - Nude - Size 9.5 M US , Italian made Women's Velvet Shoes (Cranberry) size 7 , Gentlemen/Ladies Alexander McQueen shoes Clearance price Moderate cost unique ,
    PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157 - blurrypron.com>PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157 - blurrypron.com
    Taos Elite Women's burgundy leather ankle boots sz. 7-7.5 ( 38 ) , Women’s Gianvito Rossi Lindon Leather Flat Ankle Boots Sz 38 $995ara Women's Lilly 34027 Sneaker Grey Woven Comfort ShoesBarbara Bui Black Patent Leather Platform Booties SZ 38 SaleCole Haan 6 Suede Strappy Platform Sandals High Block Heel White Navy Burgundy , Prada heels shoes pumps platform 9.5 9.5 purple , NIB Alaia Bombe 90mm Yellow Ambre Satin Studded Ankle Strap Sandal Heel Pump 38 , Christian Louboutin Burgundy Wine Pantent Pigalle Plato 120mm Heels 40Men/Women Mystique Pearl Embellished Sandals sz 9 Online Shopping At a lower price Vintage tide shoes , Nurse Mates Womens - Ceri, Grey Patent, Size 7.0 , Nike Zoom Superfly Elite Track Spikes Black White 835996-017 Sz 6.5 9, 10.5-11.5adidas PQT support size us 9.5 daily life ADV CQ3003Shoes Ignite Limitless Sr Netfit Puma Black Men 190962-01 , Reebok RB4507 Men's Dauntless 5" Athletic Hiker Black Soft Toe All Sizes Shoes~ , Adidas / Size 9.5 / White Duck Camo / BA7233 NMD XR1 Boost / NIB , Nike Air Jordan 6 VI Retro CNY Chinese New Year Black/Metallic Gold AA2492-021Man/Woman Dan Post Marlboro Boots size 11D Modern and elegant fashion Let our goods go to the world Full range of specifications , PW HUMAN RACE NMD TR MULTI AC7360 US 7.5 PHARRELL WILLIAMS JAPAN , New Men's Dockers Stowe - Brown Burnishable Full Grain - Size 13Cole Haan Men's Grandpro Tennis Stichlite Sneaker, Navy Peony/Riverside 11 US , Stacy Adams Maximillian Brown Wingtip Oxford Leather Dress Shoes$640 NIB Maison Martin Margiela 22 ACE Silver High Top Sneakers US 10 , Nike Air Max Thea Premium Metallic Field 616723-902 Women Size 9.5Asics Tiger Kinsei 6 Running Women's ShoesWOMENS ADIDAS ZX FLUX CORE BLACK COPPER ROSE GOLD BRONZE S78977 LIMITED EDITIONNike Air Max 270 Womens AH6789-601 Barely Rose Pink Wine Running Shoes Size 9.5 , Women's Brooks Glycerin 16 Running Shoes Purple/Pink/Grey 1202781B 527Womens Leather New Stylish Pointy Toe Zip Buckle Heels Ankle Boots Punk Shoes 39 , Gentlemen/Ladies DELIGHT-1020G Long-term reputation modern Cheap orderDr. Martens Women's Kendra Wine Fashion Boot, - Choose SZ/Color ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    PRADA SZ 1818 LEATHER $595 BLACK/WHITE PATENT LEATHER STRAPPY PRADA SANDAL PUMPS SZ 38 48fa157
    Heels
    >
    ;