Never miss an update

Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Near new see pics
Style: Loafers & Slip Ons US Shoe Size (Men's): 11
Material: Cordovan Shell Color: Black
Width: Medium (D, M) Brand: Crockett & Jones
Pattern: Solid UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58 -

    Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58
    Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58
    Salvatore Ferragamo Blue Logo Embossed Leather Trainers Shoes Sz 43 Italy Rare! , Emporio Armani Shoes Sneaker % LEATHER Man White X4C472XL205-A011Men's Shoes - Paul Parkman Blue & Brown Hand-Painted Derby Shoes , Tods Morsetto Entreccio New Gommini Size 10 1/2Mizuno M-Line MIZUNO MOLE Reproduction-limited model D1GA1651 made in JapanDS NIKE 2005 AIR FORCE 180 OLYMPIC OG RETRO BARKLEY 9 MAX VANDAL VINTAGE WOVEN , NIB Donald J. Pliner Men's Darrin3-K Slip On Leather & Textile Loafer in Black , P-294284 New Salvatore Ferragamo Duca Green Leather Slip-on Shoes Size US 8 / 41Cavalli Roberto Class Loafers Size 10 Brown Suede Leather Moccasins Slip On , New! Jimmy Choo 'Cash' Gray Grey Low Top Sneakers Mens 11 US 44 Eur. MSRP $550New YSL Saint Laurent White Mens Hi Top Sneakers 39.5Y-2151279 New Balenciaga Arena Orange Hi-Top Sneakers Shoe Size US7D Marked 40EMens BUSCEMI 90MM 225964 cognac leather high top sneakers sz. 42Mr/Ms Balenciaga Arena Rogue Mens 41 use The latest technology Contrary to the same paragraphNew In Box Giuseppe Zanotti Gray (Smoke) Woven Low-Top Sneakers 44/11US $795.00 , Men's Shoes Premiata Lander 3244 Grey Sneaker Fall Winter 2019 , Salvatore Ferragamo Stephen 2 Leather High Top Sneaker Orange Men Sz 14 EE 4128 , Man/Woman Christian Louboutin Tomette Louis Flat 45.5 Diverse new design Moderate cost British temperament , S-1948226 New Salvatore Ferragamo Magnifico Leather Loafers Shoes Size US 10EEE , Emporio Armani Sneaker Sz. 42,5 LEATHER Man White X4X180XL183-B139 MAKE OFFERS-2065155 New Balenciaga Embossd Leather HiTop Sneaker Shoe Sz US 10D Marked 43E , W-2152218 New Salvatore Ferragamo Manhattan Black Fabric SlipOn Shoe Sz US 7100% authentic Prada Saffiano Logo Drivers size suede 10 (11 US) dark brown , Man's/Woman's balenciaga arena 41 Good design Bright colors Modern and elegant550$ Lanvin Light Gray Suede Sneakers size US 9L-3455135 New Saint Laurent Solaris Tiger Skate Sneakers Size US-8 Marked-41COMMON PROJECTS BBALL LOW DUSTY PINK BLUSH LEATHER US 9 , CAROL CHRISTIAN POELL 2007/2008 SAFE white BONE LEATHER DERBY SHOE (45) 12 Bisonbalenciaga white leather sneakers 39 (retail price $650)
    Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58 ->Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58 -
    Kenneth Cole REACTION Rotini Side Fringe Ankle Boots, PuttyCole Haan Women's Kathlyn Bootie II - Choose SZ/ColorAuthentic Stuart Weitzman Highline Brown OTK Boots Size 8 M $798 NewBrooks Transcend 4 Mens Running Shoe (D) (002) | Brand New! , Rialto Women's Sedona Mule White Smooth Polyurethane MulesBlondo Womens bailey Closed Toe Mules Pink Size 5.5 , Vince Faine Black Woven Jute Calf Women's High Heels Open Toe Sandals Size 10 MLovely CHARLES JOURDAN (Paris) Dark Chocolate Brown Calfskin Pumps w/Strap 8.5MWomen's Ankle Buckle Glitter Rome Strappy Stilettos Casual Sandals Fashion ShoesMan's/Woman's Marni Sandals Charming design Excellent performance Don't worry when shopping , diesel Italy Leather Sandals shoes Size 36 Us 6 , New Fashion 2018 Men's J 11 High Top Breathable Basketball Sport Shoes Size 7-13 , Mens Nike KOMYUTER Lifestyle Shoes -Black -Reg $150 -AA2211 001 -Sz 12 -NewNike Air Trainer Max 94 Low Men's Sz 10 Black Green White Dark Pine 880995 001 , Converse x UNDFTD Star Player Ox Majolica Blue Size 12OluKai Men's Manoa Sneaker Off White/Toffee Canvas Moc Toe Shoes , [bargain] Asics Gel DS Trainer 22 Mens Running Shoe (D) (4985)ASICS C736N.9001 Unisex-Kids JB Elite III GS Wrestling-Shoes 2.5 M , adidas Yeezy Boost 350 V2 Triple White Kanye West size 11 NIB Deadstock. , Men/Women Cowboy Bebop Casual Mens Shoes Fashion pattern real Fine wildZara Man Mesh Leather Hi Top Fashion Sneakers - Sz. 41 (US 8 - 8.5) - RARE!! , Martegani Mart 2Brown Italian Suede slip on men’s shoes good condition size 9 MConverse Jack Purcell Special Edition Hudson Bay Co. White Stripe Wool Shoes 6.5Propet Women's Washable Walker Walking Shoe, SR Brownie, 5.5 2E US , Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 High Card Womens 12774-WBK White Slip On Shoes Size 7 , New Balance W530TCA B Floral Print Pink Gren Women Running Shoe Sneaker W530TCAB , Sam Edelman Black Suede Studded Crystal Ankle Booties Size 10Womens Leather Mixed Embroidery Knee High Riding Boots Slim Heels Stilettos A256Women Winter Rain Snow Boots Size 9 B(M) Fur Lined Collar MID-CALF BOOTS NewSalvatore Ferragamo Boutique Ankle Boots Black Leather Size 7.5 AAAA Side Zip ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Mint Black Crockett & 29366 Jones D Harvard II Black Cordovan Shell Penny Loafer 11 D $925 1831b58
    Casual Shoes