Never miss an update

NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db

Item specifics

New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Product Line: Camilla
Width: M Color: Dark Brown
Brand: Tom's Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.)
Model: Camilla Sneakerboot US Shoe Size (Women's): 10
Pattern: Crocodile Material: Leather Rubber
Style: Fashion Sneaker Boots Occasion: Casual
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db -

    NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db
    NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db
    New Balance 928 v3 Athletic Sneakers, Women's Size 9B, Black , Ladies Skechers Go Step Original Workout Fitness Memory Foam Trainers All SizesValentine's Day Special Heart On Pink Print Running Shoes For Women- Free Shippi , Man/Woman ELECTRA-2000Z durability New in stock Complete specifications , VANS Black Ball Hi SF (Leila Hurst) 70's Floral UltraCush High Top WOMEN'S 10Reebok Workout Plus MU Chalk NEW! RRP$150 Womens US5-10, Mens US3.5-8.5 , Vans Old Skool Velvet- Gray/Black Women's 87 WOMEN'S NIKE HTA RUNNING TRAINNING CASUAL BLACK WHITE COMFORTABLE LIGHT 5.5Y , BASKETS WMNS NIKE FREE 5.0+ NEUVES POINTURE 37,5 UK4 / AVEC BOITE , NEW NWOB NIKE AIR MAX 2012 SIZE Women's 5 308661-164 White & Raspberry , Skechers Performance Womens on-the-Go City 2-Hibernate Winter Boot , VANS Sk8 Hi Zip + (Leather/Nubuck/Suede) Major Brown Skate WOMEN'S 6.5 , NEW $125 HUNTER Original Women Waterproof Rain Low Top Sneakers Size US 9/ , Asics Women's Dynaflyte Tokyo Low Top Tennis ShoeSkechers AIR DELUXE Womens Casual Trail Running Black Pink Shoes Sneakers , Women's Keen Rose Sandal color Aluminum/Neutral Gray size US 9Converse CT All Star Hi Womens Blue Pink Classic Canvas Trainers SizeReebok Women's Elle Hthr Ankle-High Running Shoe , Cute French Bulldog Print Christmas Running Shoes For Women-Free ShippingNIKE LUNARTEMPO WOMEN'S CITRUS/BLACK RUNNING SHOES sz 6, 12, , WOMENS PUMA MATCH LO PNT SNAKE in colors PUMA WHITE / GOLD SIZE 8.5 , FRYE Melanie Perf Slip Slip-On Fashion Sneakers 116, Gold, 10 USAsics Womens Gel Lyte V 5 Dark Gray Pink Teal White H6R9L-1616 Running TrainerPuma Fierce EvoKnit Peacoat/Puma White 189456 02 Women's SZ 7.5Adidas Alphabounce EM Running Shoes - Women's Size 10.5, Gray/BlackVans Classic Slip On (Velvet) Oxblood/Black Women's 7 , New Womens Coleman Vail Hiker Work Leather Suede Casual Comfort Boot Gray , NEW WOMEN NIKE FREE TR 6 SHOE 833413 301 Size 8.Nike Womens In-Season 7 TR Cross Training Shoes 909009 003 Dark Grey/Volt sz 8.5
    NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db ->NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db -
    Gentleman/Lady Chinese Laundry Women's Nancy Winter Boot Fashion pattern King of quantity Valuable boutique , Cole Haan Martina Suede Leather Ankle Boot Size 10.5 $475LOW HEELED DARK BROWN OTK LAMUN BOOTS NWOB SIZE 7 OR 37!Men's/Women's New Look Women’'s 5358275 Boots flagship store Stylish and charming Highly appreciated and widely trusted in and out , Birkenstock Yara Thong - Black White - Birko-Flor patent & Graceful , New Jungla 5792 Womens Leather Ankle Boots Made In SpainCole Haan Womens Marcellesam Cap Toe Ballet Flats, Black, Size 6.0Sophia Webster Women Shoes Size 36 New Printed Espadrilles Flats , DREW WOMENS JUNIPER White Floral Snake Therapuetic Mules (17085-48) SIZE 9W # , Stuart Weitzman Shoes Size 6 Beige Black Animal Print Kitten Heel Open Toe Mules , Donald Pliner Couture Mesh Elastic Leather Shoe New Pink Lavender Signature $225Volcom Women's Costa Dress Sandal Slide - Choose SZ/colorJOE N JOYCE Rio Synsoft Soft-footbed - Bordeaux - FlipsOriginal Jordan spizikes size 10.5 good condition white/black/red/greyMan's/Woman's Asics Gel Nimbus 20 (Men's) Black/White/Carbon Exquisite (middle) workmanship In short supply Superb craftsmanshipUSMC US Military HOT WEATHER COMBAT BOOTS Vibram Soles Coyote USA Made EXCConverse Cons Pro Leather Mid Chevron Star White Bright Blue Sneaker 136780C , Wild West Men's 6X-Toe Ostrich Leg/Deer Cowboy Western Boots Different ColorsMan/Woman PUMA Men's Ignite Limitless Netfit Sneaker economic the most economical Seasonal promotion , Mens Dress Multi Color Oxfords Brogues Wing Tip Carved Flat Splice Formal Shoes , NEW Allen Edmonds "PARK AVENUE" Oxfords 8 EEE Black (262) , nike womens lunareclipse 5 running trainers 705397 600 sneakers shoes CLEARANCEMUK LUKS Women's Sandy Shoes Sneaker, Black, Size 8.0 , adidas WMNS Tubular Dawn women sneakers NEW white BZ0626 , The North Face Women's Hedgehog Fastpack Gore-Tex , Michael Antonio Women's Mannie Western Boot, Grey, Size 9.0 , Women Casual Strappy Beads Decor Ankle Boots Girls Roman Pointy Toe Flat Shoes , SAKS FIFTH AVE Tamra Curio Vintage Vitello Leather Buckled KneeHigh Boots 9M EUC , Reba NWOB Womens Stand Black Boots Shoes 6.5 Medium NEW , Nine West Savitra Grey 8 M Suede Ankle Fashion Fashion Boots Booties Block heel ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NEW TOM's Camila 10 Mock Crocodile Embossed Leather 20894 Sneaker Boot Sneaker D.Brown Size 10 US c1931db