Never miss an update

Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d

Item specifics

New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Authenticity: 100% Authentic Guaranteed
Colour: Black SizeScale: Us Size
Material: Leather Shoe Type: Sneakers
MPN: Bd4425 Style: Fashion Sneakers
Width: Medium Brand: Reebok
Never miss an update

Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d -

    Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d
    Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d
    NIKE WOMENS BENASSI JDI SLIDE BLACK WHITE 2 SANDALS **ALL SIZESNike Wmns Tessen Lightweight Running Shoes 2018 Particle Rose/Black AA2172-601Mizuno Synchro MX 2 Black Orange Silver Women Running Shoes Trainers J1GF17-1904 , Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Dainty Ox White Womens Trainers , Puma NRGY Comet V PS Pink Red White Kids Youth Running Shoes Sneakers 190676-03Skechers Womens You- Inspire 14950 Comfort Walking Shoe For Lifestyle & WellnessHigh Tops Womens Shoes UNICORN PURPLE HEARTS UNICORNS ladies athletic shoesReebok Club C 85 Leather Black White Womens Casual Shoes Vintage Sneakers AR2018 , Adidas Superstar 80s Metal Toe W Sneakers Women Shoes CP9945 Size US 8Wmns Nike Air Max 90 QS New York City Beige Red Womens Running Shoes 813150-200 , Merrell Waterpro Maipo Grey Purple Vibram Women Outdoors Hiking Shoes J03080 , Puma Bao 3 Zoo PS Giraffe Yellow Black Preschool Kids Boys Girls Shoes 19010704Puma Basket Heart NS Wns Bows Triple Black Women Shoes Sneakers 364108-01Levis Women's Sneakers High Petaluma 227828-726-17 Dark Blue , Skechers Empire-Sharp Thinking Pink White Women Walking Shoes Sneakers 12418-PNK , Nike Revolution 3 Womens Training Shoes (B) (019) | BUY NOW ! , Puma Basket Heart Canvas Wns Blue Flower White Green Women Casual Shoe 366495-03 , Zara AU Women Flatform leather sneakers 5409/301/001BNIB NEW PUMA SMASH PERF SNEAKERS BLACK & GOLD UK5 US7-7.5 EU38Wmns Nike Downshifter 8 VIII Black White Anthracite Women Running 908994-001Wmns Nike Lunarsolo Elemental Rose Pink Women Running Shoes Sneakers AA4080-606New Skechers Tr Inside Out Slip On Womens Memory Foam Shoes , Nike Wmns Air Max Tailwind 8 VIII Red Black Women Running Shoes 805942-600Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Pro Leather LP Women Sneakers Shoes Size US 9Adidas Women Shoes Running Cloudfoam Race Training Pink Gym Wokrout BB9843 NewNike Wmns Air Zoom Pegasus 34 White Blue Purple Women Running Shoes 880560-105 , Converse Chuck Taylor All Star 3V Strap Canvas Black White Women Shoes 559910C , NIKE AIR MAX MOTION LW TRAINERS UK SIZE 3 833662 403 , Wmns Nike Flex 2017 RN Run Solar Red Black Women Running Shoe Sneaker 898476-600
    Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d ->Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d -
    STUART WEITZMAN Women's Black Leather Ankle Boots Made in Spain Shoe Size 8.5M , Nine West Women's Astoria Pump - Choose SZ/colorNine West Women's Argyle Ankle Boot, Brown, Size 9.5 US / 7.5 UKPlanet Shoes Carlota Womens Leather Gladiator Sandals Cushioned/Arch Support , Nina Armando Anthea – Black Mid Low HeelsGentlemen/Ladies Pleaser ALLURE-601 Elegant shape Reliable performance Outstanding styleHandmade Men Leather Black Ankle Boot Men Ankle Boot Men Chelsea Boot Men Boot , Gentlemen/Ladies Teva Womens Niyama Slip-On- Pick SZ/Color. Reasonable price Settlement Price Good qualityJimmy Choo Shoe Dark Blue almost Black Studded Pump Size 37NEW Penthouse by Ellie "Melanie" Shoes Black Gingham w/4.5" Raffia Heel 10 , Man's/Woman's JIMMY CHOO Satin Strappy Sandal Modern and elegant fashion Price reduction Great choiceDELIGHT-669 ELASTICATED CRISS-CROSS EXOTIC POLE DANCE PLATFORM BOOTIE SANDALGenuine Grip Mary Jane Heel Women Slip Resistant Dress Shoe Restaurant Service$320 JEAN MICHEL CAZABAT BESS Black Nude Designer Wooden Wedge Sandals 9 , $455 NEW Stuart Weitzman Lovefringe Pink Suede Sandals US 4.5 High Heels Shoes , Adidas Pro Model All Black Leather high top Sz11 '70S BASKETBALL SHOE CLASSIC , Gentlemen/Ladies new balance 574 classics Burgundy 9.5 Economical and practical First grade in its class Contrary to the same paragraphadidas LUCAS PREMIERE PK - Navy - Mens , Mens Nike Dunk Low - 904234-001- Black White TrainerNike Lebron 16 "King" PRE-ORDER Size 8-14 100% Authentic Red Cheetah LIMITED , Dunham Men's Revdash Chukka Boot - Choose SZ/ColorDR COMFORT * William * 10 W * Brown Leather Strap Shoes Therapeutic 6020 , FLORSHEIM Comfortech Liquicell Navy Suede Loafer Men's Size 10 D Leather Shoes , ALLEN EDMONDS Park Avenue Cordovan Cap Toe Brown Oxford Dress Shoes 13 2A 5875Red Handmade Italian Leather Dress Shoes/Oxford Office Shoes / Size 42 - USA 9 , Lot Of 9 Women's Ladies Boots Wedge Flats Heel Sandal Size 7 - 7.5 NaturalKARMAN INC 09-021-1770-0761BR Roper Womens High Country Cassie PrintMuck Boots Black Women's Muckster II Low Boot w/ 4mm CR Flex Foam - Size 6 , Fred Segal Feet Black Leather Studded Ankle Boots Womens Size 41 EUR , Tommy Hilfiger Idele gray Chocolate Brown Leather Knee High Riding Boots
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Reebok Club C BD4425 85 Diamond Black Gum 29959 Sneakers Women Classic Shoes Sneakers Trainers BD4425 637d20d
    Athletic Shoes