Never miss an update

Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Heel Height: Very High (4.5 in. and Up)
Theme: Burlesque, Marilyn Monrose, Stripper Occasion: Stripper
Modified Item: No Material: Rhinestones
Style: Platforms & Wedges Width: Medium (B, M)
Heel Type: Platform Brand: Pleaser
Never miss an update

Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43 - blurrypron.com

    Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43
    Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43
    Pelle Moda Women's Prance Platform Pump Sz:37.5NEWAUTH TORY BURCH SUEDE/LEATHER 4" HEEL PUMPS STUDS PREOWNED SZ 7.5 BLACK & BROWN , Clarks Caslynn Shae Wedge Sandals Light Tan NEW in box US 8.5 , Eur 39,5Hispanitas Spain Anthropologie ~ Art to Wear ~ Comfy Stylish Pumps 39Womens Nightclub Polo Dance ballet Dress 18cm Super High Heels Ankle Boots Pumps , Brian Atwood Shoes Size 8 Ivory Animal Print Leather Platform Heels Pumps , Prada Womens Shoes Size 37.5 7.5 Brown Animal Print Leather Closed Toe Heels , Coclico Women’s Cut Out Leather Sandal Wood Heel Khaki Size 36.5, US 6.5 , HOT Womens Leather Fur Ball Tassel Stilettos Open Toe T Strap Sandal Shoe A147 , $225 VIA SPIGA HEAVENLY Black Patent Leather Designer Platform Sandals 10 , Women Kitten High Heels Pointed Toe Elastic Suede Shoes Party Slip On Pumps PromCole Haan Shoes Heels Black Patent Leather Wedge Womens Size 7.5 BNIB Womens ENZO ANGIOLINI Vonessa High Heel Bootie Open Toe BLACK Size 9M , Chinese Laundry Santa Fe Fringed Heel Sandals Camel Suede Sexy Sz 8.5/ 39 BOHO , Valentino Black Leather size 38.5 ,3in heel sandals, BlackPlastic heel, Good ConVintage Salvatore Ferragamo Caramel Suede Patent Leather Women's Block Heel 8.5 , $225 DKNY Donna Karan ATMORE Black Patent Leather Designer Wedges 8.5 , Signature Donald J Pliner Womens Ishia-82 Pump Sandal Shoe , DKNYC DKNY Size 10 M NADINA Snake Nude Leather Pumps Heels New Womens Shoesnaturalizer Necile Wedge Dress Pumps, Black Leather, 8 W USSexy WIDE WIDTH Hidden Platform 5 3/4" Heel Peep Toe D'Orsay Silver Pumps ShoesAnthropologie Miss Albright Platform Pump Ankle Strap Beige Taupe CoralAdrianna Papell Jamie Peep Toe Mesh Caged Pumps 225, Silver, 8.5 W US , Louise et Cie Size 7 M NIKKAH Black Leather Peep Toe Heels New Womens Shoes , Gidigio Black Leather Peep Toe Slingback Shoe Size 39.5 9.5 NEW $345Luichiny Women's Anna May BootieWomen's Shoes Clarks Annadel Eirwyn Leather Cork Platform Wedges 24868 Black New , New Cole Haan W04903 Women's Tali Bow Wedge Dress Shoes in Tango Red Size 6M , Badgley Mischka Teri Gold Womens Shoes Size 6 M Heels MSRP $265
    Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43 - blurrypron.com>Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43 - blurrypron.com
    Dolce Vita Women's Cliff Western Boot Light Taupe 8 M US , Laura Vita Coralie 03 Womens Red Floral Leather & Suede ShoesWomens Velvet High Heel Sandals With Diamante Buckles , TOD'S WOMEN'S SUEDE LOAFERS MOCCASINS NEW RUBBER BLACK CE6Womens High Block Heels Mules Slip On Lamb Auede Pointy Toe Europe Style ShoesJeffrey Campbell Ibiza Last Mirror Heels, Women's - Size , Silver/BlueCharles Jourdan ELTON BLACK 8 Patent Leather high Heel Pumps Stilettos NEW ShinyMARNI SHOES SCARPA PLATFORM PUMP STILETTO HEELS OLIVE BROWN PATENT LEATHER 40Dr Doc Martens Womens Slingback Sandals US 8 L USM 7 Brown Leather Shoes2018 Women Mules Metal Casual Genuine Leather Lady Dress Shoes Flat Slides New , Prada Women's Floral Applique Metallic Leather Sandals Size 6.5 , Skechers Women's Goldie-Diamond Dreams. Tonal Scattered Rhinestone Slip on...Gentlemen/Ladies Mens Zoom Shift Black/Red 897653 003 Clever and practical New style Most practicalMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS COLUMBIA PEAKFREAK XCRSN [BM1762 675]Nike Waffle Racer '17 PRM Premium OBSIDIAN Size 11 Men's 876257 400Men's Nike Presto Fly JDI Casual Shoes Black/White/Total Orange AQ9688 001NIKE AIR MAX 97 921826-103 WHITE BLACK PERSIAN VIOLET DS SIZE: 13 , 2019 Occident Fashion Mens Zipper Punk Hop-Hip High Top Ankle Boots Board Shoes , crocs Crocs Unisex Duet Max Clog Men/12 Women- Select SZ/Color.Sperry Top-Sider Men's Convoy 3-Eye Boat Shoe, tan, 10 Medium US , DS NIKE 2004 AIR FORCE 180 BARKLEY OG RETRO 10 UNION MAX 180 90 1 TRAINER 91Montrail Bajada II Trail Running Women's Shoes , Man's/Woman's NEW STEVE MADDEN WOMENS VENGEANCE Various styles Trendy Modern modeAltra Footwear Women's Torin 3.5 Running Shoe Pink Running SneakersBaretraps Paramount knee high boots tall black with brown sz 6 WIDE New , Women's Punk Clubwear Super High Stiletto Heel Platform Ankle Boots Shoe S Sbox1 , Womens Suede Over Knee Thigh High Stretch Boots Stiletto High Heel US11 Zsell , Nine West Women's Alberry Loafer, Dark Natural Suede, 6.5 Medium US , To Boot New York Devon Women's Knee High Boots Brown Leather Heels Size 7 MSteve Madden Women's Naomi Ankle Bootie - Choose SZ/Color ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Pink Clear Silver Pink Rhinestones Silver Platform Stripper Pole Dancer 29637 Shoes size 9 10 11 7ea3d43
    Heels
    >
    ;