Never miss an update

STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: In excellent conditions, Practically , only once. (dust bag/box not included)
Country/Region of Manufacture: Spain Material: Nappa Leather
Style: Sandals Width: Medium (B, M)
Fastening: Buckle Color: White
Heel Height: High (3 in. to 4.5 in.) Brand: Stuart Weitzman
US Shoe Size (Women's): 9 M Heel Type: Block
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482 - blurrypron.com

    STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482
    STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482
    Kenneth Cole New York Women's Gem Dress Pump - Choose SZ/Color , Valentino Garavani $825 Brown Suede Floral Heels Pumps Womens Size 9.5 M EU40 , Christian Louboutin Womens Black Pointed Toe D Orsay Pumps Size 37.5 7.5 NEW , GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI Burgundy Patent Leather Open Toe Heels Size 37 , Gentlemen/Ladies ESCARPINS LORENZI 39 We have won praise from our customers. Attractive fashion Export , FERRAGAMO NUDE PUMPS - Rose Gold Details (MADE IN ITALY) 8 M / 38Nicholas Kirkwood Casati Pearl Satin Platform Heels Size 41 11 , Sacha London Taupe Gray Suede Flore Comfort Heel Pump Shoe 7 NewStuart Weitzman Nudist Women's Nude High Heels Sandals Patent Leather Size 10.5Men/Women Stuart Weitzman Women's Pinot Dress Pump elegant Lush design comfortable , Manolo Blahnik shoes for women size 37 1/2 , Loeffler Randall Women's Carter (Kid Suede), Camel, 7.5 B USECCO FTwear Womens Women's Alicante 75 Mm Dress Pump - Choose SZ/ColorAquazurra Red Wild Thing Fringe Sandal Heels - 36.5SPRING STEP Leather Chapeco Mary Jane Pump Heel Brown Multi Size 36 5 5.5Sabrinas Purple Suede Elisabeth Heel Stretch Slip On Comfort Shoe 7 NewSabrinas Black Suede Florencia Wedge Slide Slip On Comfort Shoe 7 New , Pair of "Calvin Klein" Collection [Women's Shoes] Kidskin Dress Pump, Black, New , Sacha London Paola Black Kid Suede Leather Platform Heel Sandal Shoe 10 NewMason Margiela Brown Leather Peep Toe BootsYves Saint Laurent YSL Heel Sandals Brown Leather Shoe Women SZ/ 8 , Aquazzura Kaya Plateau Suede 140mm Sandal, Biscotto Org$775 Now$199.99Stuart Weitzman Bandura Strappy Leather Sandals/ Heels - Size 9 - NewStuart Weitzman Size 5 M Pythloops Sahara Pearl Open Toe Heels New Womens ShoesTORY BURCH "JANEY" LEATHER PUMPS/SHOES/43395; 50MM; BLACK; SIZE 8; RETAIL: $250JEFFREY CAMPBELL VANDER BLACK STUDDED PUMP SIZE 9 , PRECIOUS SERGIO ROSSI CHARCOAL SUEDE & BLACK LEATHER SLIP ON PUMPS SIZE , ROBERT CLERGERIE PARIS BLACK PATENT AND SEQUIN SHOES 39 B US , ELEGANT MANOLO BLAHNIK BLACK SUEDE WITH RIBBON TRIM SLIP ON PUMPS SIZE ,
    STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482 - blurrypron.com>STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482 - blurrypron.com
    Costume National Women’s Black Leather Riding style Boot w/ zip, sz. 40 (9.5 US) , NEW ROOTS Canada Brown Leather Equestrian Riding Boots Size 7.5 , Versace 19.69 Italia Women's Ankle Boots BLACKGentleman/Lady WOMEN'S AIR HUARACHE (BLK/PRPLE) US6 Online Shopping Fast delivery Elegant and stable packagingCamper Beetle Womens Burgundy Nubuck Ankle Boots - 36 EU , Naturalizer Molly Pointed Toe Cone Pumps, Taupe , J.CREW SATIN SLIDES WITH FLORAL EMBELLISHMENTS SIZE 9M WARM SANDSTONE G8895Alegria Paloma Size (US 8-8.5), PAL 532, Women's , Calvin Klein Jeans Perforated Oxford - Black Nubuck- Size 6.5M EUC! Classic , Vintage Salvatore Ferragamo Beige Leather Pumps 2" Heels Gold Buckle Size 7.5 B$198 BCBG MAX AZRIA FLAME Leopard Open Toe Designer Low Wedges Pumps 10 , Men/Women NEW STEVE MADDEN WOMENS JOSS sell Stylish and fun AmoyNIB NICOLE Mikaela Platform Ankle Strap Sandal ANICIENT Sz 8 , Charles Charles David Brit Wedge Sandals, Blush/Silver, 7.5 US , Skechers Ladies Go Walk 4 Sustain Sneakers Trainers Women's Fitness ShoesNIKE AIR FLIGHT HUARACHE ULTRA SZ 10 WHITE PURE PLATINUM RACER PINK 880856 101 , Nike Air Force 1 Low USA Olympic Dream Team Size 11.5 488298 406 Jordan Nvy GoldMen/Women nike sb dunk high Strong heat and wear resistance comfortability Recommended todayNIKE AIR JORDAN 1 MID BLACK PINK BLUE MENS SHOES SIZE 9.5 NEW IN BOX , Europe Men's Side Zip Sequins Bling Stage Show Over Knee High Long Boots ShoesConverse All Star - Pro Leather Ox Suede Black/White - 135312C - US Mens 10Yohji Yamamoto YY STRAP BBALL HIGH sneakers Size US 11(K-52618)Saucony HURRICANE ISO Womens sneakers S10259-3 Size 8.5 , PUMA Fierce Nubuck Naturals Womens Sz 9 Shoes Tan Brown 190908 04 , Hunter Women's Original Back Adjustable Gloss Rain Boot Black Knee High Boots , ADIDAS WMNS Ultraboost X Shoes BA8278 US WOMENS SZ 5-10 , Chunky High Heel Platform Womens Shoes Ankle Boots Side Zipper Belt BuckleAriat Women's Vale Country Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorHunter Original Tall Gloss Black Rainboots Size 8Gentleman/Lady CLARKS Women's Sashlin Fiona Fashion Boot Every item described is available First grade in its class General product
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    STUART WEITZMAN 28947 NearlyNude M Ankle 9 Strap White Nappa Leather Sandals size 9 M c30f482
    Heels
    >
    ;