Never miss an update

Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Sneakers
Upper Material: leather-synthetic Product Number: B44871
Shoe Type: Low Top Gender: Men
Lining: Textile Brand: adidas
Fastening: Lace Up Sole: Rubber
Model: Pace Low VS UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a - blurrypron.com

    Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a
    Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a
    Nike Air Shake Ndestrukt Gym Red Men Sz 8 - 12 , NEW! NIKELAB AIR FLIGHT 89 Gym Red/White 828295-600 Mens Size 9.5 , NEW Mens NIKE Jordan Sixty Club 535790 016 Black Red Yellow Sneakers Shoes , *New* Nike Air Jordan 31 XXXI Shattered Backboard Starfish 845037-021 Size 11 , Mens NIKE LunarTempo Black Running Trainers 705461 001 , Adidas EQT Equipment Support ADV red black men's lifestyle sneakers trainers NEW , Vandal High Supreme Canvas QS Doc Brown Size 10 Mens Shoes AH8605-800 , ADIDAS ADIPURE men USsz: 8; 9; 10; 11;12 Slide Sandal Slippers Flip-Flops V21529 , New With Box Nike Free Trainer 5.0 V6 AMP Size 8.5 Ohio State Buckeyes OSU RareNike Air Zoom Gimme Texas Longhorns Golf Shoes Orange White Size 13 880145-801 , ADIDAS ORIGINALS MENS SHOES ZX FLUX ADV NEW NMD HAMBURG BERN GAZELLE S79013BRAND NEW!!!! Nike Men's SF Air Force AF1 MID BLACK 917753-003 Size 9 , New Mens Sz 12 Nike Flyknit Trainer Ah8396-004 Black/anthracite Triple Black Fly , Salomon X Ultra LTR GTX Hiking Shoes-Men's sz 10 BrownNEW Nike Men Size 10 Zoom Hawk Flight Bball Shoes 805272-100 White Black Silver , Nike Air Force 1 High '07 Arctic Pink/Dust-Sail NIB Size 10 - 315121-611Adidas Ace Tango 17.3 TF Blue Indoor Soccer Men's Cleat Sz 9.5 S77083 argentinaNike Lupinek Flyknit Low Cargo Khaki Men SZ 8 - 13 , CONVERSE SAMPLE Chuck Taylor ALL-STAR HI Premium Leather 1970s BLACK vtg 159680C , New Keen Men's Gypsum II Waterproof Hiking Trail 12m Black TangoNike Air Trainer III PRM QS - CHOOSE YOUR SIZE- 682933-001 Bo Knows Horse Racing , New Piloti Prototipo Racing Shoes Black Nubuck Leather White Trim Men’s Size 6 , ADIDAS ORIGINALS PROPHERE SZ 11.5 TRACE OLIVE GREEN SOLAR RED CQ2127 , Nike Air Force 1 ‘07 Low JDI Just Do It BQ5360 800 Total Orange SZ 10.5 , NEW adidas Speed Trainer 2 - Blue/Gold Running, Cross Training (Men's 9)ADIDAS NMD RACER PK SZ 10 CORE BLACK GREY CLOUD WHITE PRIMEKNIT AQ0949adidas Originals X_PLR - Men's Scarlet/Collegiate Burgundy/Gum B37439 , Adidas Damian Lillard 3 Men's Basketball Shoes Black/Icepur/Burgu B49509ASICS GEL-Kayano 24 Running Shoes, Men's Size 11, Grey ,
    Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a - blurrypron.com>Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a - blurrypron.com
    ASICS Women's Gel-Sendai 3 Running Shoe - Choose SZ/colorWomens Brenda Kings RCR Dark Red Boots sz 7Corral Women's Sand Rose Laser-Cut Cowgirl Boot - Snip Toe - C3140Adidas NEO Cloudfoam Lite Racer [CG5728] Men Casual Shoes Black/WhiteLacoste Marice 218 Navy White Canvas Womens Slip-ons ShoesNina Armando Scarlet – Grey Stiletto Heels , Donald J Pliner Fico Loafers Women Size 7.5 Flats Shoes Orange Tan Casual Dress , Anthropologie 2568 Pendleton Women Sz 10 Navajo Moccasin Penny Comfort Shoe (SA)Men's/Women's Tod’s HOP77A Cobalt Blue Ballerina Flats Reasonable price Modern design Amoy , ROGER VIVIER Chips Suede Ballerinas Us 8.5 Eu 39.5 , Isola Delanna Womens Black Leather Lasercut Platform Sandals Heels Size 10 M* , PRADA BUCKLE FRONT PUMP Heels Size 36.5 US 6.5 (SH1000DEVIOUS TRAMP-709 Exotic Stripper Platform 7 1/4" Heel Tall Platform Heels Shoes , *** Bordello Bella-12R red satin rhinestones stiletto peep toe pumps heels 8 , STUART WEITZMAN AUTH $399 Women Orange Suede Leather French Cuff Sandal Size 7.5 , NIB Santini Mavardi Miami julia silk gold stone pumps sandals Shoes 35 5 3 heels , Christian Louboutin OSTRI SLING 100 Slingback Heels Shoes Black Red NIB 7.5NIB MENS SIZE 11 NIKE AIR MAX VISION RUNNING SNEAKERS RED 918230-6002011 Men’s Air Jordan Retro 10 X “Chicago Bulls” Size 13 White/Varsity Red/Black , Men Breathable Steel Toe Prevent Puncture Safety Shoes Casual Sneaker Work BootsNew! A TRIBE CALLED QUEST Vans Classic Slip On Shoes ATCQ Mens Womens SneakerMan/Woman New Balance Men's Mrl420sv Innovative design Known for its good quality Good qualityNEW COLE HAAN DK BRITISH TAN BROWN LEATHER AIR JEFFERSON OXFORD DRESS SHOES 13 , JOHNSTON MURPHY Brown Leather Moccasin Orthopedic Kiltie Dress Loafer Men's 11M , Nike Air Huarache City Low Black/Black/White/Orange Premium / JDI Pack O3140001 , Men's/Women's Reebok F/S HI White/Silver sneakers sale High grade Lush design Complete specificationsVintage Justin Green Lizard Skin Cowboy Boots For Women Size 6.5B-4771 , White Mountain Tivia Faux Shearling Lined Winter Boots, BlackNEW FERGIE BLACK RICH OVER THE KNEE BOOTS SHOES SZ 6.5Man's/Woman's Rieker Womens D8573 Emilia 73 sell Fast delivery Non-slip
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Adidas pace Low pace vs Shoes Men's Adidas Sneakers Shoes Retro Trainers Sport Shoes B44871 New bc5839a
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;