Never miss an update

Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Dr. Martens
Features: Lace-Up, Heel Loop Accents: Metallic
Boot Shaft Height: Ankle Model: Pascal
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 6 Details: Metallic
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 37 Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.)
UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 4 Material: Leather
Pattern: Solid Style: Combat Boots
Width: M Color: Silver
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5 - blurrypron.com

    Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5
    Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5
    Women's Boots H By Hudson Keira Distressed Buckle Boot Size US 7 Eu 37Fratelli Rossetti Brown Ankle Boots Euro 40/Genuine Leather , VIA SPIGA womens 8.5 Gerry chocolate brown suede ankle boots booties new , Propet Women's Tessa Riding Boot, Brown, 6 W USVince Camuto Signature Boot Snakeskin Look Brown Riding Motorcycle Chocolate , Calvin Klein Women's Bestie Ankle Boot - Choose SZ/Color , New $295 Fly London Yolk060Fly Wedge Chelsea Snow Boot waterproofWhite House Black Market Boots Brown Leather Suede Heels Sz 10M (36-12)Propet Women's Tessa Riding Boot, Brown, 7.5 M US , Paul Green Munchen brown quarter boots, AUS 6.5 (US 8.5)Alberto Fermani Cori Womens Shoes Dark Brown Suede Ankle Boots Sz NEW $475Tory Burch Women Black Knee High Boots Size 8 Fits Like Size 7 See The DescFranco Sarto Womens Christine Wide Calf Knee-High Boots Shoes BHFO 3847Miz Mooz Women's BRADY Boot, Stone, 41 M EU/10 US , sz 9.5- 10/ 40 NEW DANSKO boots womens Wedge Ankle SHIRLEY taupe Leather , Sam Edelman Womens Black Leather Knee Fashion Boots 7 MVia Spiga Maury Block-Heel Booties, Blue, 8.5 US / 38.5 EU , *NEW* FRYE Sz 6.5, 7 M Molly Button Tall Leather Riding Boots $398 NEW Black , Vince Camuto Bendra Over The Knee Suede Riding Boot Khaki Verona Sz. 8M NWB $198 , Sam Edelman Azra Platform Boots Size 8 NEW NIBCAMSSOO Women's Classic Studded Strappy Pumps Rivets High Heels Stiletto...Pleaser Women's Div1050/Bpu-Salc Ankle Bootie - Choose SZ/ColorTommy Hilfiger Sexy Red Leather Knee High Treasure Boots High Heels Sz 8 M NIB , ARIAT EXTREME LADIES BOOT - SIZE 7 - WATERPROOF - THINSULATE LINEDDONALD J PLINER SNAKESKIN BOOTS WOMEN SNAKE LEATHER SLIP ON MID CALF SIZE 7 US , Frye Womens Judith Zip Bootie Black Leather Boots New , GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI Black Leather Ankle Boots - Booties size 41 or 10.5Clarks Womens Arctic Venture Brown Winter Boots Shoes 6 Medium (B,M) BHFO 9165RAYE Ankle Boots Womens Size 10 Black Suede Western High Heel Booties Shoes ,
    Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5 - blurrypron.com>Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5 - blurrypron.com
    New Naot Viento Boot - US Size 11 - Brown LeatherDan Post Women's Amelia 01-DP3742-BN41 Tan Brown Leather Fashion Cowboy BootsCHLOE Suzanna Studded Taupe Suede Buckle Bootie sz 37 NEW $1380.00 #qNike Men's Air Zoom Mariah Flyknit Racer Black Size 10.5 US Running Shoes , Gentlemen/Ladies Cozy Navy Pat Paul Mayer Flat Aesthetic appearance Latest styles Exquisite (processing) processingVidorreta Gypsy Blue Espadrilles Flat Sandal Raffia Sole size 10 (41) NEW , Chase & Chloe Bobby Hidden Wedge Shoe - Women's Size 10 - Beige *NWBElastic Topline Stretch Leather Ballerina Pumps Gold Black White Beige Shoes , Pleaser RADIANT-708NSB Women's Clear Neon Pink Heel Platform Ankle Strap Sandals , Adrienne Vittadini Womens Gratian Suede Open Toe Ankle Strap, Canapa, Size 11.0 , Ted Baker Women's APPOLINI Heeled Sandal, - Choose SZ/Color , Brian Atwood Stellah calf hair sandals NEW size 6VGC Keen XT Green Leather Waterproof Sport Sandals Buckle Strap Buckle Strap 7 , Gravity Defyer Simina Brown LTHR Sandal Size 8M G22/Nike RARE Air Zoom LWP '16 NikeLab "Kim Jones" Cool Gray (918226 004) - Size 11 , Nike Air Max 90 Men's Vast Grey/Vast Grey/Atmosphere Grey | Leather H8443003 , Under Armour Hovr Sonic Men's Black/White/White 20978007 , Nike NU Retro Air Jordan II sz-10 , Nike Air Max Lebron 12 Xii Prm Palmer Lebronald Lime Mango 11.5 Yeezy Jordan 14 , SKECHERS Waterproof Brown Leather Work Boots Men's Size 10.5Lowa Men's Tibet GTX Extra Sepia/Black Winter BootsMen/Women Skechers Men's Dusen-Sendro Oxford selling price excellent Non-slipWmns New Balance Size 9 Grey Purple Retro 574 Womens Running Shoe WS574THI , crocs Swiftwaterleatherclg Mens Swift Water Leather CLG Fisherman Sandal , Under Armour UA Horizon STR Women Sneakers Shoes NEW Size 8.5 9 , Asics Gel-Kayano 25 White Pink Blue Womens Running Shoes Trainers 1012A02-6100Adidas Women Originals Stan Smith Nuud Running shoes white CQ2900 UK3.5-6.5 04'Zigi Girl Jordan Size 9 Women Ankle Boots Platform Leopard Print 5" Party WearAerosoles Women's Timespan Ankle Boot, Taupe, Taupe Combination, Size 10.0 , NIB $168 Splendid 'Culver' Booties Suede Wedge Ankle Boots Smoke Cedar 9.5, 10
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Dr Martens Pascal IM Combat Boot Laser Laser mogochinese-23447 Dr Holographic, Lazer Silver Metallic 6L 4431bb5
    Boots
    >
    ;