Never miss an update

Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13

Item specifics

Condition: New without tags :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item that is not in original retail packaging or may be missing original retail packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Display Shoe. Ink on material of shoe(s). The images shown are of the actual shoes for sale.
Brand: Opening Ceremony Fastening: Slip On
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7 Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 to 2 3/4 in)
Colour: White Pattern: Solid
MPN: Nadyia Width: Medium (B, M)
Style: Mules Heel Type: Block
Material: Leather Shade: White
UPC: 889207250117
Never miss an update

Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13 -

    Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13
    Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13
    Athena Alexander Gaylenn Slip-on Wedge Sandals, White, 12 USBandolino Semise Dress Ankle Strap Sandals, Black/Black, 7.5 USMarc Fisher Partner Ankle Strap Flats Sandals, Pewter, 8.5 US , GUESS Chrina Gladiator Sandals 457, Medium Brown, 6.5 USNina Elyana Strappy Wedge Peep Toe Dress Pumps, Ivory Crystal, 9.5 US , Circa Joan & David Narda Peep Toe Slingbacks Sandals, Black, 7.5 US , Calvin Klein Kiani Strappy Peep Toe Ankle Sandals 160, Olive Snake, 6 US , Nine West Markando Block Heel Platform Strappy Sandals 380, Siver Metallic, 11Kenneth Cole Olivia Espadrille Mule Sandals 834, Desert, 8 US / 39 EU , Caparros Christine Rhinestone Strappy Sandals, Black, 8 US , naturalizer Eliza Flat Ankle Strap Sandals, Alabaster Leather, 7.5 N USIndigo Rd. Badie Ankle-Strap Sandals, Ivory, 6 USTS35 Tamra Zip Up Ankle Strap Sandals, Black, 7.5 USMarc Fisher Hocie Buckle Slingback Sandals, Light Natural Leather, 8 US , Betsey Johnson Lenox Gemstone Ankle Strap Sandals, Black, 9 US , Easy Street Adorable Square Toe Slingback Sandals, Black, 7 WW USCalvin Klein Evonie Tassel Flat Sandals, Platinum White , Vince Camuto Edola Heeled Gladiator Sandals, Black, 8.5 US / 38.5 EUI35 Mayla Block Heel Slide Sandals, Black, 9.5 US , Salvatore Ferragamo Groove Slide Sandals 127, Blue/Silver, 10 USCarlos By Carlos Santana Verity Flat Sandals, Bourbon, 10 US / 40 EU , Jessica Simpson Rianne Peep Toe Sandals, Black Stretch Crochet , Badgley Mischka Tasha Strappy Sandals 958, Silver Glitter, 5 US , Bella Vita Noa-Italy Knot Slide Sandals, White Leather, 12 USAdrianna Papell Adler Braided Strappy Sandals, Platino Metallic, 10 USNina Earleen Front Bow Ankle Strap Sandals, Black Luster, 7.5 USNina Fianna Sequined Criss Cross Sandals 645, Silver Stardust, 5.5 US / 35.5 EUGB35 Colbey2 Criss Cross Espadrilles Sandals, Black, 6 US , Guess Romie3 Logo T-Strap Sandals, Medium Natural, 10 US ,
    Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13 ->Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13 -
    Vans Vault OG Classic Slip-On White Men Women Skate Boarding Shoes 71070804BROOKS ADRENALINE GTS 18 GREY BLUE EE WIDE MENS 2018 SHOES **FREE POST AUSTRALIAUnder Armour Speedform Slingshot 2 Grey White Black Men Running Shoe 3000007-101New Womens Ted Baker Metallic Immet Synthetic Shoes Ballerina Slip OnLadies Padders Ankle Boots Clarinet - W , NEW Lalay KKL Model Bathrobe With Fringes Large Lilac , Django & Juliette red suede multi boots size 38 AIDOS styleLADIES SHOES/FOOTWEAR - Cassini Mirova shoe copper/black , TS TAKING SHAPE sz 38 womens Grace Loafer / shoes RRP$149.95Sanuk TWEEDY II Sidewalk Surfer Black Slip On Loafers Shoes Sandals Women 7 BNWTOTBT Women's Salem Black/Multi Fabric/Leather Comfort ShoesCalvin Klein 7.5 M Callison Black Leopard Open Toe Wedges New Womens ShoesNew Women Bowknot Fashion Ankle Buckle Mary Janes Sandals Casual Stilettos ShoesManolo Blahnik $630 Nappa Bronze Sandals Shoes Silver Concho Detail 8 Medium EUC , New Priv Art Brown Suede LEATHER Crystal Buckle Pumps Heels 38 7.5 Made in ITALY , RENE CAOVILLA C09321 100 ALIYA-T NUDE STRASS 110 EMBELLISHED SATIN PUMPS 6.5Mark Lemp Classics Womens millie Open Toe Casual Ankle Strap SandalsWomen Gladiator Retro Roman Rhinestoes Knee High Boots Open Toe Sandals Hot , Nike Air Jordan Jumpman Team II 819175-101 Basketball Shoes Men SZ 15 , Nike Jordan Eclipse Holiday Black/Infrared 23 Bone Size US 10.5 Men's 812303 005New Balance/JCrew Collab 998 National Park Sneakers 8 Crater Lake (w/o Tags) AVLAdidas EQT Cushion Adv Mens CQ2380 Royal Blue White Knit Running Shoes Size 12 , Gentleman/Lady Men Black Leather/Python Cowboy Boot Packaging diversity Modern and stylish fashion The first batch of customers' comprehensive specifications , MENS HANDMADE BLACK CHELSEA GENUINE LEATHER ANKLE BUCKLE BOOTS FOR MEN , Chippewa IQ Boots Size US 11.5XW Safety Work Boots , Supra Ellington Black / Black / Black S73031 MSRP78Giorgio Venturi Men's Classic Leather Wing Tip Black/White Shoes StyleASICS Women's Conviction X 2 Running Shoe Black/Carbon/Flash Coral Size 8 , Balance Women's Nergize V1 FuelCore Sneaker,BLACK,7.5 B US , Nike Free RN Flyknit 2017 GS Multi Color Kid Youth Women Running Shoe 881973-001
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Opening Ceremony Opening Nadyia Block EU Heel Slip On Sandals Block 901, White, 7 US/ 37 EU c4f3d13