Never miss an update

Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Heel Type: Square heel
Pattern: Solid Item Type: Boots
Material: Rubber Outsole Material: Rubber
Features: Zip MPN: Short Boots 7539
Style: Winter Boots Country/Region of Manufacture: China
US Shoe Size (Women's): 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6.5, 6 Brand: Unbranded
Modified Item: No Upper Material: Flock
Boot Shaft Height: Mid-Calf Model: 84625
UK Shoe Size (Women's): See Variation Closure Type: Zip
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): See Variation Heel Height: Med (3cm-5cm)
Product Line: None
Never miss an update

Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981 -

    Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981
    Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981
    Merrell Thermo Shiver 8” Waterproof Women’s Winter Boots Size 9 New Hiking Trail , ECCO wedge ankle boots in Brown US size 7New Sam Edelman Womens Tinsley Blue Rainboots Size 10 , $298 BCBG MAXAZRIA Womens MA-Dorota Over Knee Faux Fur Boot Shoes, Black, US 7.5 , New Kenneth Cole Womens Lady Of Mine Brown Fashion Boots Size 9$139 BCBG BCBGeneration Women BG-Joesana Suede Platform Bootie Shoe,Black,US 5.5BRILLIANT Women Winter Boots Size 8.5 M Brown Leather Faux Fur Rubber Sole , I LOVE COMFORT Black FIONA Ankle Bootie Size 6.5 M NIB , $260 KORK-EASE 'Umbrielle' Mid-Calf Boot, Tassel, Rust Suede 9.5 , Kenneth Cole REACTION Women's Hot Step Cocoa Western Boot Size 9.5Report Riko Women's Boots Cuffed Wedge Suede ankle Booties Boots Burgundy 7M , INC Womens Fedee Leather Harness Knee-High Riding Boots Shoes BHFO 2917 , Salomon Hime Mid Leather Waterproof Boots Women's Beige / Bordeaux US Sz-7.5 euc , Sperry STS91175-090M Women's Tan & Navy Duck Boot 6 M US G874Women Buckle Strap Fur Lined Leather Platform Stiletto Combat Party Ankle Boots , $139 BCBG BCBGeneration Womens BG-Joesana Platform Suede Boot Shoe,Black,US 5.5 , Women Fashion Bowknot Pull On Suede Block Heels Shoes Sweet Gril Ankle Boots , MIRANDA LAMBERT Jaxxon Peep Toe Womens 8 M Cognac Open Toe Boots Heels NWOB , Women's New Casual Leather Locomotive Double Zipper Platform Black Ankle Boots , DOUBLE H 12" CRAZY HORSE FULL GRAIN DISTRESS LEATHER MOTORCYCLE BOOTS 10MVINCE CAMUTO NEW Womens Black Felishan Suede Booties Shoes 10M TEDONine West Women's Brown Meantime Wedge Boots , Naturalizer Womens jump Leather Almond Toe Ankle Fashion BootsW Women Genuine Leather Platform Wedge High Heel Ankle Boots Zip Tassel CreepersAntonio Melani Miranda Ladies Red Ankle Heels Boots Sz 8.5 Faux Snake SkinNew Seychelles Womens Vip Taupe Booties Size 7.5 , Salomon Women's X Ultra Aero Mid Titanium/Swamp Hiking Boots 10M , CASSADEI Brown Women's Pointy Suede Boots With Size 37/6.5 , DURANGO CRUSH HEART CONCHO BROWN COWBOY BOOTS SZ 6M EUC
    Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981 ->Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981 -
    GB35 Raiven Knee High Buckle Boots 384, Black, 11 US , Women's Harley Davidson Liam Boots, Black, 9.5 US, M , Saint Laurent Niki Asymetric Haunting Green Suede Ankle Boots Size 36 , Traditional Handmade Aladdin Men Shoes Khussa Leather Flip-Flops AU 8-12.5Planet Shoes Jess Womens Leather Slip On Flat Comfort ShoesRALPH LAUREN Collection Cream Leather Ballet Flats Military Nautical 9AA ITALYDansko Women's Delphina Ankle Bootie, Taupe Milled Nubuck, 37 EU/6.5-7 M US2019 Platform Peep Toe Stiletto Party Womens Sandal Boots Nightclub Shoes Size , J.Crew Contrast Glitter Heels Suede 6 shoes $218 black f4978 6.5 ankle strap , Steve Madden Size 7.5 Black Strappy Sandals Heels New Womens Shoes , Christian Louboutin Beige Patent Leather "New Simple" Platform Pumps SZ 37Man/Woman Naturalizer Women's Reva Dress Pump Easy to clean surface Stylish and fun Great choiceNike Men's Shoes Kobe 8 NSW Lifestyle LE Snakeskin Size 10Nike Dunk Ultra Red/White Men's Size 7 and 12.5 New in Box NO Top Lid 845055 601 , Men's Puma Speed 600 S Ignite Blue Depths Lapis Coral 189087 07 New In BoxNike Florida Gators Free Trainer V7 Week Zero Shoes AA0881-401 Size 9.5 Mens , NEW CONVERSE CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR PREMIUM HI WOOLRICH SHOES 149455C SIZE 10 , Adidas Superstar Xeno AQ8180 Reflective Green Casual Basketball Shoes Men's 10Nike Air Jordan Melo M9 Carmelo Anthony Black Metallic Gold US 12 /Nike Kyrie 3 University Red Grey Suede 852395-601 LIMITED Size 8~13 Authentic , Air Jordan 12 Retro Playoff Size 11.5 , Adidas Response Boost Tech Fit Women's ShoesNew Balance Women's WRL247WL Running Shoes Marblehead 8 B US , Hoka Women's ARAHI 1016259 Dresden Blue Gold Fusion Running Brand NewW Nike Lunarepic Low Flyknit 2 RunEasy Sneakers Size 9 Hot Punch/Black-AluminumWOMENS ADIDAS ORIGINALS EQT BASKETBALL ADV SZ 7.5 GREY WHITE CORAL AC7351 , *New* Nike Air Max 90 PRM Women’s Size 8.5 Shoes Bronze 896497-902 , Men/Women DELIGHT-600-23 Innovative design a variety of Global salesSkechers Women's Adorbs-Sweater Trimmed Snow Boot - Choose SZ/ColorSexy Womens Ladies Patent Leather Pointed Toe Side Zipper Stiletto Shoes Boots ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Women Fashionable Scrub Wild Wild Pearl Short Single Square Trend Trend Solid Cute Short Boots b495981