Never miss an update

Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7




Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Brand new without the original box or tags.
Brand: Dr. Martens Fastening: Lace Up
Style: Mid-Calf Boots Country/Region of Manufacture: Thailand
Width: Medium (B, M) US Shoe Size (Women's): 5
Material: Leather UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7 - blurrypron.com

    Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7
    Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7
    Pleaser Women's Seduce-3028 Knee-High Boot,Black,9 M USEverybody Women's Jenna Boot, Fango/Noce, 37 BR/7 M USMIZ MOOZ SLOANE LEATHER ZIP BOOTIES 8.5 heels shoes pumps strappyVery Volatile Women's Markie Bootie Stone 8 M USCharles David Women's Starla Ankle Boot,black,35.5 Medium EU (5.5 US)NIB Y.R.U. YRU AURA Witch Short Boots in Black SIZES 6, 7, 8, 9,10 - SALEJeffrey Campbell Cromwell Pointed Toe Suede Size 8.5 BlackCarmen Marc Valvo Agnese Pointed Toe Ankle Boots 741, Grey, 8 US / 38 EUWomen's Shoes US Size 6 - Arche Garok Ankle Boot Nubuck Leather, in Box , VOGUE Brown Leather & Wool Indian Saddle Blanket Bootie Heels Fringe Zip 8.5 NEW , Lanvin concealed wedge boot Size 37.5 BlackNew Tory Burch Black Navy Blue Rosalie Riding Boot Size 5Joma Western Women's calf suede Black 136465 Size 6 fit women's US 8 , Pleaser 7" Heel Open Toe/Heel Ankle Boot, Side Zip Women Boots Blk/Blk-Pewter RSSpring Step Women's Popsicle Winter Boot, Dark Brown, 41 EU/9.5-10 M USFly London Women's Seli Black Leather Moto Bootie Size 40 , §§§ BELLES BOTTES MARRON MARITHE FRANCOIS GIRBAUD T 36 TTBENew Donald J. Pliner Dalis Leather Python Ankle Boots Grey Size 5 US $348BCBGeneration Alexa Velvet Block-Heel Booties (Bottle Green, 6.5)Vince Camuto Womens Damefaris Block Heel Bootie Graystone True Suede Ankle BootsOscar Sport Julia Ecol Boots Tall (37 US 6.5) Womens Faux Fur & Goat Apres Ski , Tory Burch Sofia Buckled Black Leather Riding Boot Size 7.5 , Roper Women's Fringes Riding Boot, Brown, 5.5 B USASH Womens Heidi Floral Embroidered Western Suede Leather Ankle Boot, Size 6 37Men's/Women's Calvin Klein Carney Ideal gift for all occasions cheapest Caramel, gentleFrye Boots Size 9 Women's Billy Pull On Black Motorcycle Harness Flower StuddedGentle Souls Womens Best Of Leather Motorcycle Ankle Boot , NEW Laredo Mysterious Snip Toe Back Zip Western Boots Studs Stitched Womens 6.5 , Flex & Go Zoey Womens Comfortable Suede Ankle Boots Made In Portugal
    Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7 - blurrypron.com>Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7 - blurrypron.com
    Gentleman/Lady Fergie Women's Danica Knee High Boot Outstanding features Clearance Extreme speed logisticsPunk Cool Womens Motorcycle boots Cowboy Retro Shoes Leather Mid-Calf Buckle New$495 Tory Burch Black Leather Blossom Block Heel Boots Ankle Booties 10 , $798 Stuart Weitzman HIGHLAND Topo Suede Over The Knee Boots 10 / 40 , 1.2K PRADA MIU MIU black/burgundy CORSET knee-high BOOTS 35.5 US 5.5 - amazing , Men/Women GUESS Black Camoscio Boots £ service Has a long reputation Tide shoes listWomens PAUL GREEN 209311 black leather ballet flats sz. 3.5 UK (6 US) $285DANSKO Wide Pro Cabrio Women Size 40W Black Leather Work Clogs Shoes , Fashion Women Peep Toe Celeb Rhinestone Shoes Sexy Ladies StilettosANNE KLEIN NewYork Black Satin"ANIKA"Slingback Heels W/Rhinestone Decor10.5M B26 , Alex Marie Taliena Leather Cross Strap Pumps Black sz 9MJessica Simpson Kariba 7 M Black Lux Kid Suede Open-toe Block Heel Sandals NewPink Black Cyber Goth Electronic Raver Demonia Torment Womans Boots Shoes 7 8 9Fashion Girls Mary Janes Womens Casual Slip On Hollow Out Breathable Flats ShoesVintage 2008 NIKE Air Max 315908-108 Size 9.5 Leopard Shark Custom , Nike Kaishi NS Men's Shoes Sz 11.5Loyal Blue White NWB 747492-444BEARPAW Men's Marcus Boot Black II Size 10 DM US , Prince T26 Men's Tennis Shoes 8P021M-008 18G , Mens Nike Air Jordan Future Premium Sz 12.5 (652141 219) Dark ChocolateJordan Retro 4 IV white cement 308497 103 , Men's Black Exotic Lizard Design Genuine Leather Cowboy Boots Rodeo Round Toe , How Dashing!! Men's "WorkForce" Heavy Leather Oxford Shoes++SIZE 9 WIDE++ , PRADA Men's Dark Blue Leather High Top Sneakers Size 10 US / 9 UKMens Cole Haan Size 10.5M Lunargrand Brown Leather Oxford Shoes Captoe Brogue , Mephisto Men's Rafael Fisherman Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorNine West Women's Gannon Thong Sandal Dark Natural Synthetic Sandals , SALOMON XT WEEZE WS 100% Authentic Women's running shoes hiking outdoor 390363 A , Adidas Women Stan Smith Athletic Running Shoes White Pink AC8413 SZ 4-12 , New Sam Edelman FRANKLIN Trendy Black Boot Chunky Stacked Heel Sz 10MMan/Woman Kamik Women's Detroit Snow Boot Best-selling worldwide buy Good quality
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Dr. Martens US Coralie 15291001 Womens Black Black Leather Boots Medium (B, M) Womens Size US 5 89633a7
    Boots
    >
    ;