Never miss an update

Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 736705643616
Weight: 2.53 lbs EAN: 0736705643616
Dimensions: L 12.87 x W 11.14 x H 4.8 inches Brand: Fergalicious
PartNumber: F9924F1-400-5.5 M US MPN: F9924F1
ProductGroup: Shoes Binding: Apparel
ISBN: Not Applicable Color: Denim
US Shoe Size (Women's): 5.5 M US Department: womens
Style: Not Applicable
Never miss an update

Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0 - blurrypron.com

    Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0
    Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0
    Bogs Women's Amanda 4-Eye Rain Boot, Black, 8 M US , Circus by Sam Edelman Women's Jennifer Fashion Boot, Black Waxy, 8 M USClarks Originals ORNELLA Chelsea Sand Suede Boots 9.5 Women's MSRP $275 NEW , Blondo Womens Venise Leather Almond Toe Knee High, Black Boston, Size 9.0 , SANTANA CANADA PALOMINO Black Leather Designer Boots Knee High Boots 10.0 MClarks Women's Faralyn Dawn Dark Black Suede High Boots 26121588 , Eight Fifteen Size 8 Women's Black Leather Suede Brooke Open Toe Ankle BootsFree People Tan Pointy Toe Leather Flat Size 40 , dav Women's Calgary Shearling Rain Boot, Black, 9 Medium US , $275 Australia Luxe Collective Cowboy Wedge womens suede sheepskin boots 8/ 39 , Mr/Ms Bogs Women's Summit Boot,Black,6 M US elegant low cost Highly appreciated and widely trusted in and outRetro omen Flats Strappy Suede Leather Over Knee High Boots Military Long BootsMen/Women Howl Black Leather Nine West Exquisite (middle) workmanship Optimal price Explosive good goods , Dolce Vita Women's Marra Fashion Boot, Smoke Suede, 9.5 Medium US , JCrew $228 Hadley Velvet Ankle Boots 9 Zinc Gray Block Shoes H3195INC International Concepts Womens Irinaa Suede Almond Toe Over, Black, Size 7.0FRYE Womens Natalie Double Zip Boot- Select SZ/Color. , New Hunter Original Tall Gloss Rain Boots, Red, (Women) size 7 (38 EU) , Roxy Women's Vargas Low Fashion Boot, Chocolate, 7.5 Regular US , Gabor Cheyenne Womens Studded Zip Ankle Boots , Pleaser RBOW1018UV-7/B/NMC Women's Boot, Black Patent/Neon/Multi, 7 M US , Mas Artisan Women's Aria Ankle Bootie, Cafe, 9 M US , JEFFREY CAMPBELL 2615 KI PERF Black Leather Designer Boots Ankle Boots 6.0 M , Lauren Ralph Lauren Sigrid Women's Fashion Knee High Leather Tall Riding Boots , Softspots Women's Black/Black Sherry 9.5 C USDEMONIA 7" Wedge Platform Punk Rave Gogo Dancer Pink Hologram Knee Boots w BeadsHunter Original Tall Razzle Black Womens Shoes Size 7 M Boots MSRP $235Rodolphe Menudier Women Heels Fur Winter Ankle Boots Pumps Brown Suede Size 37 , Bernardo Women's Felicity Fashion Boot, Black Tumbled Oil, 7M M US ,
    Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0 - blurrypron.com>Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0 - blurrypron.com
    Bottes vintage "Gold" - ELYSE - T. 38Sigerson Morrison Jessica Women's gray suede over knee high boots sz. 6.5 , Lamb Wool House Shoes - Bali Snake Ladies Fur Shoes Shoes Slippers , Steve Madden Jodi Platform Sandals 106, Black Multi, 8.5 USAGL ATTILIO GIUSTI LEOMBRUNI Loafer Flat Beige 9.5 Leather KEEPER Moccasin taupeDANSKO BLACK LEATHER MARY JANE WOMEN SHOES SIZE 38 EUR / 7.5 US / , PRADA md ITALY KITTEN HEEL THONG SANDALS GREY/MAUVELOUS PATENT SZ 37.5 , RE-MIC CLASSIC VINTAGE FOOTWEAR OPEN TOE LEATHER SLING BACK BOW SHOES 10M $172Paris Hilton Women's Wedge Sandals Platform Wedgies Lifties Black Rubber SoleOSCAR DE LA RENTA Slides SANDALS Womens size 38.5 / 8 Green Leather HEELS ShoesSCHUTZ Women's Cadey Lee Heeled Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorVintage Embroidery Dragon Ladies Satins Mary Janes Buckle Block Heels Pump RivetJimmy Choo Black Patent Pointed Toe Pumps Size 9.5 - Made in Italy , Today Black Kid Stuart Weitzman Womens PumpsWORLDboot HEMERA Haze BLACK /Slate BLACK /Skirt SKIRT / NAKED Unisex 7 WOMEN 8 , ASICS Gel Harmony TR Cross Training Shoes Women’s Size 7 US Near Mint ConditionNIKE Men's Flex Experience RN 4 Premium Navy/Blue/White size 12 , Men's Nike SF AF1 Air Force 1 Special Field Shoes -Size 12 -864024 400 , NEW BALANCE Fresh Foam Cruz V2 Nubuck Men | Mercury Red / Chili Pepper , Diesel Men's V is for Diesel S-Spaark Leather High-Top Sneakers Black Size 8 M , ADIDAS EQUIPMENT EQT SUPPORT ADV CORE BLACK WHITE GREY BLUE NMD R1 BY9583 11Mizuno Men's Wave Tornado X Mid Grey Green Gecko Volleyball Indoor Shoes , NIKE AIR JORDAN 5 T23 Sneaker Sneakers TOKYO Japan Limited Rare US8 26cm Used , HELLY HANSEN WHITE SNOWPROOF BOOTS US 9.5... 12” OUTSOLE... THEY RUN LARGE! , CAIMAN CROCODILE CHERRY BLACK SQUARE TOE SADDLE MENS WESTERN BOOTS 8218218 ALTOSNew Dr Doc Martens Mens calf leather Shoes Boot - Great Work / Chef shoe +$140Invicta 24665 Womens Angel Quartz Stainless Steel Casual Watch, Color:Two ToneEcco Women's Shoes Ankle Boots Black Suede Size 7/37 FREE SHIPPING!AUTHENTIC PRADA SNEAKERS 3T5731 WHITE BLUE FLORAL NEW US 8.5New Women Ankle Boots Fur Furry Stripe Buckle Low Block Heel Zipper Casual Shoes
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Fergalicious Boot, Women's High Tender Knee High Boot, Denim, 5.5 M Denim, US 424bfc0
    Boots
    >
    ;