Never miss an update

GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d




Item specifics

Condition:
New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: GUESS
Color: Brown Toe Type: Round Toe
Boot Shaft Height: Ankle Modified Item: No
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7.5 Calf Width: Medium
Heel Type: Stiletto Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up)
Width: Medium (B, M) Style: ANKLE BOOTS
Occasion: Casual, Party Material: Leather
Never miss an update

GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d - blurrypron.com

    GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d
    GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d
    Womens Wedge Platform Super High Heel Fashion Black Frosted Ankle Boots Bt15Women's CASUAL WANTED LASER WHITE BOOT STYLE SIZE 6.5,7.5,8,8.5,9. , TEVA DELAVINA 1012436 MULE DARK BROWN LEATHER WOMEN'S CLOGS US 11 Nib , Franco Sarto Banner Black Leather Round Toe Bootie Ankle Boot 6.5 NEW , $160 Steve Madden Womens Concrete Zip Western Ankle Boots, Black Leather, US 9 , Women's Shoes High Wedge Platform Over Knee Boots Pull On Boots Plus Size VogueNew~NIB~*Sexy*JENNIFER LOPEZ 'Rosie' Studded Ankle Boots~Black~Sz 7.5, 8, 9 , Calvin Klein black suede over the knee boots size 6.5 , WOMENS ROPER BURGUNDY LEATHER COWBOY WESTERN RIVIT BOOTS SZ 7.5~1/2 M , Lucky Brand Women's Echoh Suede Size-Zip Ankle Booties BlackWomens Bowknot Zip Fur Trim Mid Calf Boots Shoes Plus Sz Furry Lining US4-10.5 , Womens Platform Faux Fur High Heels Stilettos Mid Calf Boots Bow Side Zip ShoesBORN Harness Knee High Riding Boots Brown Leather Zip Womens 8 | 39 W62417 , My Hero Academia All Might Cosplay Shoes Boots Custom Made , Gentleman/Lady Report Women's Hartwell Ankle Bootie fashion High-quality materials Current shapeEarth Leather Cut-out Heeled Sandals - Vicki Black wide 6.5 , Ladies Fashion Mid Calf Boots shoes Western Flat Slouch Vintage Buckle Hot ShoesBlowfish Berkeley Boots Womens Ankle Boots Mid HeelPleaser ELECTRA-2000Z Women's White Faux Leather Stack Heels Platform Knee Boots , Women's Shoes White Mountain TICKET High Heel Bootie Elastic Panels Strap TaupeEARTHIES Black Leather Ankle Boots Womens Size 9Women cute fur warm ankle boots charm Snow Plus size thick heel princess bootyLADIES WOMENS THIGH HIGH OVER THE KNEE CHUNKY PLATFORM HEEL STRETCH BOOTS SIZE , Clarks Artisan Leather Waterproof Ankle Boots Pita Austin PICK SIZE NEW , $139 BCBG BCBGeneration Women BG-Joesana Platform Ankle Bootie Shoe, Black, US 9 , Ellie Shoes Women's 253 Rebecca Victorian Boot, Black, 8 M US , Man/Woman WOMENS LUGZ SHIFTER FLEECE WORK BOOTS Various styles Trendy VariousWestern Chief Women's Waterproof Printed Tall Rain Boot Snow Winter RubberRed Spike 5.5" High Wedge 1.5" Platform Sexy Ankle Boot Size 6
    GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d - blurrypron.com>GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d - blurrypron.com
    Ralph Lauren Collection Purple Label Boots Size 8.5 B Womens Leather Riding BootNIB $1898 CHLOE CH11203 GOLD STUDDED BOOTS 36.5 Made in Italy , Catwalk style brown zebra XTI faux nubuck leather ANKLE SHOE BOOTS bnib eu40French Connection Ankle Strap Sandals 543, Sand Gold, 6 US / 36 EU , Bally Black genuine Calf Leather Size 9 (39 1/2 Euro) Kitten HeelsGentlemen/Ladies Skechers Women's Cleo Bewitch Ballet Flat New market Stylish and fun British temperament , Anne Klein Houndstooth Black And White Sandal Slides Heels, 9.5Man/Woman Jessica Simpson Women's Fedelee Platform Pump Not so expensive New products in 2018 Clearance saleLANVIN Ete 2013 Gold Leather Strappy Metal Heel Platform Sandals 39 , 100% Authentic Valentino bow booties size 36 Excellent CondtionCARVEN Orange Suede Bow Sandals Pumps - SIZE 40 - Worn Once - In Box , Silver rhinestone ankle wrap 7" platform showgirl shoesCHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN Ron Ron Zeppa 100 Wedges Pumps black patent 38.5 EU / 8.5 USMr/Ms Dansko Julie Sandals-Women's size 9.5-10 White excellent quality Win highly appreciated Exquisite workmanshipsummer party ladies wedding formal tassel rhinestone sandals shoes stilettos new , Women's Juicy Couture FAY Palm Tree Flip Flops Sandals Seaside Blue Multi US 5.5Nike Air Zoom Spiridon '16 Men Size 10.5 Metallic Silver Black 3M 926955-003NIKE CLASSIC CORTEZ LEATHER WHITE VARSITY RED 749571-154 og forgest gump Mens , Nike Air Huarache Run Premium Black Athletic Shoes Men's 11.5 , Lebron Christmas Edition Sz 10 Near DSNike Hyperdunk Low Lux Black Men Size 14.0 New Rare Authentic BasketballAir Jordan 11 Low Derek Jeter RE2PECT AV2187-441 BINARY BLUE/SAIL US 11Original military winter boots (260/41) from BUNDESWEHR - USED!! (8) , Rockport Men's Classic Leather Lite Penny Slip On Loafer Shoes Cognac M76445.Prada Unlined Leather Penny Loafer in Brown Calfskin, 9.5Florsheim Royal Imperial 607089 Wingtip Oxfords Perforated Burgundy Men's 11 3E , ALLEN EDMONDS “MacNeil" Wingtip Brogue Black Leather Men’s Shoes Size 10.5 C , Men/Women FRYE Women's Melanie Perf Mule Sneaker bargain cheapest Extreme speed logisticsPuma Muse Metal Athletic Shoe Black Rose Gold size 6.5 ART 36704701 , Marc Fisher Black Leather & Stretch Frenchie Ankle Boots NEW ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    GUESS clean!! women’s ankle leather boots size 7.5 7.5 very leather clean!! 059c96d
    Boots
    >
    ;