Never miss an update


Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Guess
Style: High Top Main Colour: Black
Sole: Rubber Shoe Size: 41
Material: Leather Activity: Casual
Features: Lace-Up Lining: Leather / Fabric
Pattern: NA EAN: Does not apply
Never miss an update


    Nike Air Zoom Fearless Flyknit Black/White/Chlorine Blue/Vivid Purple 50426006NEW WOMENS NIKE FREE FLYKNIT + 5.0 PINK Size 10Nike WMNS Roshe Two Print [844933-004] NSW Casual Floral Black/White-PinkNew Women's Nike Zoom Volley Hyperspike Volleyball Shoes Size 12 585763-010Nike Air Huarache City Size 7.5 Womens Wolf Grey Fierce Purple AH6787 004NIB APL Techloom Pro W White Gold Silver Size:66.5 WOMEN'S NIKE AIR HUARACHE CITY MULTICOLOR RAINBOW CASUAL SHOES AH6787 400NIB Salomon Speedcross 4 Women's running shoes Slateblue-Spa Blue-Fresh Green , Vans Womens Size 7.5 Van Gogh The Letters Slip On Sneakers RARE NWT NIB , New Womens Nike Free Run 2018 Running Shoes Black/Anthracite All SizesWomens Nike Air Foamposite One Particle Beige AA3963-200 Size: 8.5 , Adidas NEO Questar X BYD [B96480] Women Casual Shies Pink/White-Aero BlueVans Opening Ceremony GLITTER 2 OG OLD SKOOL LX Black Silver Men 9 Women 10.5 , New PRIVO Women Suede Mesh Casual Comfort Flat Walking Athletic Zip Up Sz 7.5 MRoyal Elastics Icon 1806 White Green Gum Women Slip On Casual Shoes 92983-040 , Men's/Women's NO NAME Arcade Kaki Durable service First quality Highly appreciated and widely trusted in and out , NIB Nike Free TR Focus Flyknit Sneaker Gray Purple 844817-003 Womens Sz 8.5Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 Flyknit OG Shoes Size 8 Womens Purple 881109 102 NewNike Zoom Volley Hyperspike Volleyball Shoes Womens 10.5 (585763-010)Nike Flyknit Trainer Chukka FSB Blk/Volt Women's SZ 5.5 NEW 624975-001 LUNAR HTM , Guess Baskets Femme Sneaker Compensée Foresst Logo Blanc , PUMA Women's Fierce Bright Collection Shoes Sneakers Pink-Glo Kylie Jenner 9 , Nike WMNS Air Max 2017 womens running run shoes 849560-103 Sz 8-9-9.5 , SALOMON Sense Escape W Women's Running Outing Hiking Shoes 400929 , New Balance 993 Suede Breast Cancer Cure Running Shoes Pink Ribbon W Size 9Nike Women's Air Force 1 High Suede 749266-601 Red Gum Size 9 , NIKE WOMENS PREMIUM AIR MAX LD ZERO TRAINERS IN PEARL PINK 911180 600 RARE 38.5 , Nike Roshe One Cherry Bls Blossom Women's 819960-100 White Pink Flower Rare , Men's/Women's CONVERSE Limited Ed. 1C15SP38 SNEAKERS Moderate price Impeccable Elegant and stable packaging
    HUNTER Original Tall Gloss Rain Boots - NIB Size 8 **BONUS Buffalo Check Scarf**Durango Boot Women's DRD0170 Crush 12" Mixer Western Boot Tan/Snake LeatherFree People Jeffrey Campbell Headed Home Boot Brown Size 8 MSRP: $388Aquatalia By Marvin K. Freida Women's Tan Cutout Bootie Sz 9.5 2938 *Haider Ackermann Women's Black Suede Ankle Boots Size IT40/US10~Retail $1200 , BROOKS ADDICTION WALKER LEATHER WHITE EE XWIDE WOMENS SHOES **FREE POST AUST , Gentleman/Lady Pleaser SEDUCE-3000 Wht Str Pat Moderate price Moderate cost Fair price , AGL / SPECTATOR BALLET IN BROWN NAPA & BLACK PATENT / L 43 & R 44 / EXCELLENT , NEW IN BOX $145 DANSKO 'Misty Nappa' Black Leather Patent Accent Mary Jane SZ 122018 Occident Pearls Womens Block Heels Leather Slip On Mules Party SlipperShoesCalvin Klein 34E7663-HDU Womens Alisha Sandal- Choose SZ/Color.NIKE MEN'S SZ 10.5 AIR MAX 90 ANNIVERSARY 725235-300 DUSTY SNAKENEW BALANCE 580 DECONSTRUCTED RETRO RUNNING SHOES TAN OFF WHITE MRT580DT1710 Nike Kaishi 2.0 Men's Sneakers Sports Shoes 833411-401New Nike Men Air Huarache "Snakeskin" Running Shoes Black Gum 318429-052 **Nike KOBE IX 9 Elite PerspectIve High Size 13.5 Volt Turquoise 630847-400Nike Air Jordan Retro XVII 17 + OG Metallic Copper White Royal Black 832816-122Vtg John Fluevog Mens Black Leather Wooden Engineer Clogs England Size US 9Men's SKECHERS All Black MAVIN WORK Slip Resistant Sneakers Shoes 77042 NEWRED WING SHOES 8881 Classic Moc men's leather boots US 6 (pv:) , LOS ALTOS BROWN GENUINE CAIMAN CROCODILE BELLY ROUND TOE WESTERN COWBOY BOOT EE+Gentleman/Lady Eastland Men's Astor Oxfords Various goods real business , Mephisto EDLEF Mens Edlef Slip-On Loafer- Choose SZ/Color.Stacy-Adams Men's Beau loafers Black leather Shoes 24692-001FitFlop SPORTY-POP X WOMENS TAN SUEDE LEATHER CRYSTAL FASHION SNEAKERS 11 NEW , New! Women’s New Balance- 8702 Running Shoes SIZE 7 Pink/Black/White W870PB2 B29Nike Air Max Thea Print Casual Women's Shoes , Lucky Brand Womens LAHELA Leather Almond Toe Ankle Fashion Boots , Thierry Rabotin wedge heel slip on ankle bootie brown suede 37.5 7.5 leopardBed Stu Dipper Boots, Women's Size 6.5, Brown
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.


    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Athletic Shoes