Never miss an update

Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Dr. Martens
Pattern: Smooth Style: Fashion - Ankle
Never miss an update

Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe - blurrypron.com

    Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe
    Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe
    Italian Designer Walter Steiger womens black leather booties flat pointy toe 37FLUEVOG Vintage Sz 6/BIG JOHN Chocolate Brown Nubuck ANGELS Engineer BootsWomen's Genuine Leather Wedge High Heel Ankle Boots Big Fur Winter Warm Sneakers , Disco GoGo Dancer 60s 70s Hippie Burlesque Costume Platform White PA BootsPleaser Exotic Dancing SKY-1018UVMG Platform Open Toe Ankle Boot$268 Frye Women’s 7.5 M Bethany Cuff Shortie Burgundy Rose Leather Heeled BootsSkechers Performance Women's Go Walk 3 Slip-On Wal - Choose SZ/colorBrown Miz Mooz Toan Ankle Boots 8 , Hi-Tec Women's Florence Low Waterproof Multisport - Choose SZ/colorUS11 Women Sequin Ankle Snow Boot Fur Line Winter Warm Outdoor Leather Flat Shoe , Man/Woman Demonia GOTHIKA-600UV Women's Vegan Boots Quality queen Orders are welcome Modern and elegant , Womens Denim Blue Plain Leather Western Cowgirl Boots Mid Calf Casual Square Toe , Premium Sheepskin - Jumbo double toggle chestnut size 7 Made In Australia , Nine West 25028388 Womens Cavanagh Suede Ankle Boot- Choose SZ/Color.2018 Autumn new women high-quality fashion Nail bead decoration shoes size:35-40 , Women Round Toe Chunky High Heel Over Knee Boots Winter Shoes Plus Size EU34-46 , Chooka Women's Wide Calf Memory Foam Rain Boot, Mulberry, 7 M US , Bandolino Womens Camme Wide Calf Leather Riding Boots Shoes BHFO 4646 , Man's/Woman's CLARKS Women's Medora Sage Ankle Bootie Crazy price comfortability Clearance sale , Womens Stilettos High Heel Over The Knee High Leather Boots Punk Rivet Shoes 8New Womens Leather Real Fox Fur Tirm Knee High Boots Winter WARM Flat Snow ShoesHunter Original Tall Gloss Women Graphite Rubber Rain Boots Size US 6 , NEW Hunter Original Deep Sea Wedge Bootie Bright Coral Women's Sz 7~~MSRP $225 , Women Snakeskin Sexy Over The Knee Thigh boots Stiletto High Heels Evening Party , Bottes cuir châtaigne MINELLI Taille 40 us 8Hunter Original Tall Gloss Swamp Green Womens BootsSam Edelman Womens Whiskey Penny Riding Boots Shoe Size 7 MEnglish Riding Boots Black Leather Marlborough Equestrian Sz.7.5 flat Knee Boots , Charles by Charles David Womens ollie Suede Almond Toe Over, midnight, Size 7.5
    Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe - blurrypron.com>Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe - blurrypron.com
    Women Real Leather Suede Snake Print Knee Boot Pointy Toe Kitten Heel Shoes SzTory Burch Bristol Donovan Black Gold Medallion Leather Riding Boots Tall Sz 7Muck Boots Black/Hot Pink Women's Arctic Ice Mid Boot - Size 9Aldo Womens Yoania Ankle Bootie- Pick SZ/Color.Scholl Orthaheel Cairns Mens Comfort Slip On Casuals , Clarks Keeler Step Mens Black Leather Shoes H Fitting UK7-12 (R11A)BLUNDSTONE 742 Woman's safety shoes, FREE SHIPPING UK SIZING , La Redoute Womens Wedge Sandals With Flower Trim Sole Beige Size 39 (5.5 To 6) , Minnetonka Women's Cally Slipper Hot Pink Suede Slip-on Shoes , Rockport Total Motion 75MMPTH Pointed-Toe Pumps, Cloud Patent, 9 US / 40 EU , Women's Patent Leather Pointed Toe Cuban Heels Pearls Chic Party Lady Shoes Size , US14 Ladies Womens Sexy Pointed Toe Patent Leather Stilettos High Heel Shoes E13Summer Women Leather Hollow Out Multi Strappy Flat Casual Zipper Sandals Boots , NEW Vivienne Westwood Caruska sling back heels , NEW! NIB THE FLEXX Tabacco Nubuc Leather SUN TROPEZ Comfort Wedge Sandals Sz 6 9Nike Roshe Two Flyknit Mens Running Trainers 844833 003 Sneakers Shoes , 2008 Nike Air Max PENNY II 2 WHITE ATLANTIC ROYAL BLUE BLACK GREY 333886-141 9McRae Men Leather 8" Unlined Brown (MR89011) , NEW MENS SIZE 8 GEORGIA 6" AMPLITUDE WTP SAFETY COMPOSITE TOE WORK BOOTS / SHOESAllen Edmunds Mens Size 12D Black Leather Made in Italy Comfort LoafersPOLO RALPH LAUREN MAN SNEAKER SHOES CASUAL FREE TIME CODE A85 Y0037 ROSUL A2236Mens Round Toe Floral Dress Formal Causal Shoes Leather Oxfords Loafters Slip OnSperry Mens Gold A/O 2-Eye Roustabout Slip-On Boat Shoe, Tan/Brown, 11 DM US , Sakroots Women's Saz Critter Flat Sneaker Navy Bird Slip-on Shoes , Mizuno Womens Wave Kazan XtaticRide Fitness Running Shoes Sneakers BHFO 5065Nike Women's Air Max Thea Mid Obsidian/Sail/Bright Grape [Size 7.5] 859550-400 , Slate Black El Naturalista Wedge Heel Ankle Boots 6.5 37MOMA Women's Leather Double Cross Straps/Zipper Moto Style 3" Heel EU39 , Evercreatures Women's Rubber Green Rain Boots lovely Chicken Wellies , Steve Madden Womens Brown Leather Knee Boots 7.5 M ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Dr. 5 Women's Martens Women's 1919 Purple Smooth Boots US 5 LAST!!! LAST!!! 5778bfe
    Boots
    >
    ;