Never miss an update

NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Le Pancaldine
Style: Mary Janes US Shoe Size (Women's): 8.5, 9
Color: Purple Black
Never miss an update

NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528 -

    NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528
    NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528
    Ferragamo Brown suede tassel fringe block heel pumps. 8 AA narrow , PRADA IVORY LEATHER DIAMOND STRAPPY ARCHITECTURAL WEDGES HEELS SANDALS SZ 36Chinese Laundry Kristin Cavallari Cambrie High Heels, Women's- Size 9.5, Beige , FitFlop Womens Jewely Back Strap Sandal Shoes, Flame, US 10FENDI METALLIC GOLD PEEP TOE SHOES - US 7.5 - 37.5 PATENT LEATHER KITTEN HEELSWomen's Shoes Vince Camuto STARINA Pointed Toe Pumps Leather Castor BlackPLEASER High Heel Sequin Bootie Rhinestone Accent Platform BLONDIE-R-1008 GoldMen's/Women's Paul Andrew Shoes 270506 Grey 36 Durable service high quality classic style , BY568 LELLA BALDI shoes black leather women pumps , Roman Womens Occident Pointy Toe Suede Elegant Cross Strap Stilettos Sandals sz , BADGLEY MISCHKA - TATIANA PLATINO METALLIC OPEN TOE PUMP SZ 7, RETAILS $235 , Lanvin Authentic Womens Shoes Size 39.5 Beige Slingback Heels Leather SandalsPRADA Jardin Nero Black Floral Patent Leather Strap Heels, Women’s IT 36, US 6 , Demonia Women's Clash 206 Wedge Mid Calf Boot Black Vegan Leather/Canvas Size , Dolce & Gabbana Nude Leopard Pumps org.price 550 , VIA SPIGA Womens BRANDY Black Suede Peep Toe Wedges US 9W (E0971L1001)Womens Clubwear Pumps Platform 16cm High Heel Leather Shoes Party Stilettos Shoe , Pleaser 7" purple chrome sequins ankle bootsMan's/Woman's DMSX Eliza Black Sheep Nappa 8 Complete specification range Order welcome Reliable reputation , MANOLO BLAHNIK PYTHON HEELS - 10 - 40 - IRIDESCENT RAINBOW SLINGBACKS SNAKESKIN , SAS Women BLISS LEOPARD HUGE SALE NOW $98.99 WAS $119.99 FREE SHIPPINGWomens Less Wedge Heel Platform Side Zipper Evening Ankle Boots Shoes Size 35-43 , Gladiator Womens Leather Retro Strappy High Heel Zip Roma Ankle Sandals ShoesPleaser 6" pink chrome fringe dancer ankle boots , Women's Shoes Poetic Licence WILD SAFARI Oxford Platform Wedge Pump Green 6/ 6.5FERRAGAMO ITALIAN Two Tone Bronze Women's 6 B Shoes EUC , ZARA NEW SS 2015 SNAKE LEATHER PRINTED WEDGE US 7.5 REF.1485/001 NWT!!! , RUBBER 100% LATEX BALLET BOOTS SIZE 6-16 HEEL - 0' -- PRODUCER OF POLANDVery Volatile Dallas Cowgirl Boots Brown Women's Fashion NEW Boutique Cowboy ,
    NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528 ->NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528 -
    Gentlemen/Ladies SCHUTZ Women's Lupe Ankle Boot High grade Quality First Non-slipKelsi Dagger Brooklyn Women's Kenmare Ankle Boot Bronze 8 M USNine West 25024068 Womens Jehsi Leather Boot- Choose SZ/Color.Men's/Women's SW1181A Men's Winter Boots We have won praise from our customers. The latest technology Exquisite (processing) processingMan/Woman Clarks Leisa Vine Leather Sandal the most convenient special function Different stylesBOBS from Skechers Womens Highlights-Get Knitty Flat- Pick SZ/Color. , Valentino NIB $775 rockstud ballerina pebbled leather water rose , women's pointed toe slip on suede leather pearl high heel stilettos pumps promGibellieri 2042c Navy Perforated Leather Open Toe Slide Sandals 41 / US 11 , Chloe Black Leather Crisscross Strap Sandal Block Heel size 36 , Under Armour UA Toccoa Mens Trail Running Shoes Size 10 or 10.5 *NEW in BOX*VASQUE MEN'S AETHER TECH TRAIL RUNNING SHOES 7698 ORANGE, US SIZE 8, 8.5 NEW , Mens Jordan Flight Luxe 919715-637 Bordeaux/Bordeaux Brand New Size 8 , Under Armour UA SpeedForm Fortis 2 ULTRA BLUE- Pick SZ/Color. , adidas MEN'S TRAINERS DRAGON ORIGINALS RUNNING SPORTS CASUAL FASHION SMART BNWTNew Balance 575 Elite Blue/Black MD575EBB Men's SZ 12 , Nike Airmax Sq Uptempo Zm Size 9.5 , Men/Women CQ3022_adidas Shoes – Prophere black/charcoal/red_2017_Men_Textile_Nuevo Excellent value Modern design best seller , Mens 10D Larry Mahan Nocona Ostrich Leather Cowboy Boots Texas USA , Alden Indy Boots 403 Made in USA , Mens Suede Leather Tassel Slip On Moccasion Driving SHoes Loafer Yellow Comfort , Shoes Skechers Equalizer Vivid Dream 12028 BKW Womens Black Woven Moccasins , Adidas Women's Tubular Invader Strap Ankle-High Basketball ShoeNew Balance Women's WL696 Re-Engineered Sneaker Vintage Orange/Sea Salt Sneakers , New Balance 996 WR996GO womens running shoes sz 5 greyMARINA RINALDI Women's Black Lauro Slip On Sneakers US 9 / IT 39 $320 NWTJeffrey Campbell Siren Bootie, Black Neoprene, Womens Various SizesNew Dingo Fashion Cowboy Western Boots Harness Turquoise Beads & Studs Size 7Ladies Justin Brown Bull Shoulder Leather Cowboy Western Boots Size: 7.5 BMarc Fisher Women's Stefani Western Boot, Dark Beige, 6 M US ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NWB Le Pancaldine t. carolina 29947 Viola mogochinese-29953 Mary 40 Jane Flats Purple/Black sz 40 (8.5,9) 2a0d528